Loading learning content...
If an Access Control List is a complete sentence describing who can do what to an object, then Access Control Entries (ACEs) are the individual words that compose that sentence. Each ACE is a precise specification: a subject identifier, a set of permissions, and a determination of whether those permissions are granted or denied.
Mastering ACE construction is essential for implementing effective access control. A poorly constructed ACE can grant unintended access (a security vulnerability) or deny legitimate access (a usability failure). This page provides deep, practical knowledge of ACE anatomy across both POSIX and Windows systems, enabling you to craft precise, effective access control policies.
By the end of this page, you will understand the complete anatomy of ACL entries, including subject identifiers, permission bitmasks, entry types (allow/deny), and flags. You'll be able to read, write, and debug ACE specifications in both POSIX and Windows formats, and understand how different entry types interact during access evaluation.
Every Access Control Entry, regardless of operating system, contains the same conceptual components. Understanding this universal structure enables you to work effectively across platforms.
Universal ACE Structure:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Access Control Entry (ACE) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Entry Type │ │ Subject │ │ Permission Mask │ │
│ │ │ │ Identifier │ │ │ │
│ │ - Allow │ │ │ │ - Read │ │
│ │ - Deny │ │ - User ID │ │ - Write │ │
│ │ - Audit │ │ - Group ID │ │ - Execute │ │
│ │ │ │ - SID │ │ - Delete │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ - etc. │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Flags │ │
│ │ - Inheritance (container, object, inherit-only) │ │
│ │ - Inheritance propagation controls │ │
│ │ - Audit success/failure selection │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
POSIX and Windows use different terminology for the same concepts. POSIX calls entries 'ACL entries' with a 'tag' type, while Windows uses 'ACE' (Access Control Entry) with an 'ACE type'. The underlying concepts are identical—a specification of subject, permissions, and allow/deny determination.
POSIX.1e (the draft standard implemented by Linux, FreeBSD, and other Unix systems) defines six entry types for access ACLs. Understanding each type and its role is essential for constructing correct ACLs.
The Six POSIX ACL Entry Types:
| Tag Type | Qualifier | Description | Traditional Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACL_USER_OBJ | None (implied owner) | Permissions for the file owner | Owner bits (rwx------) of mode |
| ACL_USER | UID of named user | Permissions for a specific user by UID | No traditional equivalent |
| ACL_GROUP_OBJ | None (implied group) | Permissions for the owning group | Group bits (---rwx---) of mode |
| ACL_GROUP | GID of named group | Permissions for a specific group by GID | No traditional equivalent |
| ACL_MASK | None | Maximum permissions for named users and groups | Intersects with group bits in mode |
| ACL_OTHER | None | Permissions for everyone else | Other bits (------rwx) of mode |
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
# View and understand each entry type$ getfacl /project/document.txt# file: project/document.txt# owner: alice# group: engineering user::rw- # ACL_USER_OBJ: alice (owner) has read+writeuser:bob:r-- # ACL_USER: bob specifically has read-onlyuser:charlie:rw- # ACL_USER: charlie has read+writegroup::r-- # ACL_GROUP_OBJ: engineering group has readgroup:marketing:r-- # ACL_GROUP: marketing group has readgroup:executives:rw- # ACL_GROUP: executives group has read+writemask::rw- # ACL_MASK: maximum for named users/groups is rwother::--- # ACL_OTHER: everyone else has no access # Internal representation (struct acl_entry):struct acl_entry { acl_tag_t e_tag; /* ACL_USER_OBJ, ACL_USER, etc. */ acl_perm_t e_perm; /* Permission bits (r=4, w=2, x=1) */ id_t e_id; /* UID or GID (undefined for _OBJ types) */}; # Binary representation in extended attribute:# Each entry = 8 bytes: tag(2) + perm(2) + id(4)# # Example for user:bob:r--# tag: 0x0001 (ACL_USER)# perm: 0x0004 (read only)# id: 0x000003E8 (UID 1000, typical first user)The Critical Role of ACL_MASK:
The mask entry is often misunderstood but is crucial for POSIX ACL semantics. It sets an upper bound on permissions for named user entries, named group entries, and the owning group entry. The mask does NOT affect the owner (USER_OBJ) or others (OTHER).
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
# Scenario: We want bob to have read+write, but temporarily restrict all # extended permissions to read-only # Initial ACL$ getfacl file.txtuser::rw-user:bob:rw-group::r--mask::rw-other::--- # Effective permissions: bob has rw- (his entry AND mask = rw-) # Now reduce the mask to read-only$ setfacl -m m::r-- file.txt$ getfacl file.txtuser::rw- # NOT affected by mask (still rw-)user:bob:rw- #effective:r--group::r-- #effective:r--mask::r-- # Mask is now read-onlyother::--- # NOT affected by mask # Bob's STORED permissions are still rw-, but his EFFECTIVE permissions# are r-- because: stored_perms & mask = rw- & r-- = r-- # The #effective: comment shows actual permissions after mask application # This is powerful for temporary restrictions:# - Set mask to r-- during maintenance: everyone gets read-only# - Restore mask to rwx after: original permissions are restored# - No need to modify individual entries! # chmod on a file with ACL updates the mask, not just group bits:$ chmod g=rx file.txt # This sets the MASK to r-x, not the group!$ getfacl file.txtuser::rw-user:bob:rw- #effective:r-- (mask limits bob's write)group::r-- #effective:r-- mask::r-x # chmod affected the maskother::---When you run chmod on a file with extended ACL entries, the group permission bits actually modify the ACL mask, not the owning group's permissions. This is a common source of confusion. If chmod g-w breaks application access, the mask reduction is likely affecting named user/group entries. Always use getfacl to see actual effective permissions.
Windows provides a richer set of ACE types, supporting not just allow and deny but also auditing and special system-level controls. ACEs are classified into two main categories based on which ACL they appear in:
| ACE Type | ACL Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE | DACL | Grants specified permissions to the SID |
| ACCESS_DENIED_ACE | DACL | Explicitly denies specified permissions to the SID |
| ACCESS_ALLOWED_OBJECT_ACE | DACL | Grants permissions to specific properties/child object types (AD) |
| ACCESS_DENIED_OBJECT_ACE | DACL | Denies permissions to specific properties/child object types (AD) |
| SYSTEM_AUDIT_ACE | SACL | Generates audit events for specified access attempts |
| SYSTEM_ALARM_ACE | SACL | Reserved for system alerts (rarely used) |
| SYSTEM_AUDIT_OBJECT_ACE | SACL | Audits access to specific properties/child types (AD) |
| ACCESS_ALLOWED_CALLBACK_ACE | DACL | Dynamic access evaluation via callback function |
| SYSTEM_MANDATORY_LABEL_ACE | SACL | Integrity level control (Vista+) |
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
// Windows ACE header (common to all ACE types)typedef struct _ACE_HEADER { BYTE AceType; // Type of ACE (ACCESS_ALLOWED, ACCESS_DENIED, etc.) BYTE AceFlags; // Inheritance and audit flags WORD AceSize; // Total size of ACE in bytes} ACE_HEADER; // Standard ACE structure (ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE, ACCESS_DENIED_ACE)typedef struct _ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE { ACE_HEADER Header; ACCESS_MASK Mask; // 32-bit permission mask DWORD SidStart; // Start of variable-length SID} ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE; // ACE flags for inheritance and auditing#define OBJECT_INHERIT_ACE 0x01 // Child objects inherit#define CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE 0x02 // Child containers inherit #define NO_PROPAGATE_INHERIT_ACE 0x04 // Don't propagate to grandchildren#define INHERIT_ONLY_ACE 0x08 // Don't apply to this object#define INHERITED_ACE 0x10 // This ACE was inherited#define SUCCESSFUL_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG 0x40 // Audit successful access (SACL)#define FAILED_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG 0x80 // Audit failed access (SACL) // Example: Allow Read for "Users" group with inheritance// ACE Type: ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE (0x00)// ACE Flags: CONTAINER_INHERIT | OBJECT_INHERIT (0x03)// Access Mask: FILE_GENERIC_READ (0x00120089)// SID: S-1-5-32-545 (BUILTIN\Users)Viewing Windows ACEs with icacls and PowerShell:
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637
# Using icacls to view DACL entriesC:\> icacls C:\Projects\secret.txt C:\Projects\secret.txt NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(F) # Full control BUILTIN\Administrators:(F) # Full control CONTOSO\alice:(M) # Modify CONTOSO\bob:(R) # Read (allowed) CONTOSO\eve:(D) # Deny (if preceded by deny flag) # Permission key:# F = Full Control R = Read# M = Modify W = Write# RX = Read + Execute D = Delete# (OI) = Object Inherit (CI) = Container Inherit# (IO) = Inherit Only (NP) = No Propagate # Using PowerShell to see complete ACE details$acl = Get-Acl "C:\Projects\secret.txt"$acl.Access | Format-List # Output:# FileSystemRights : Read, Synchronize# AccessControlType : Allow# IdentityReference : CONTOSO\bob# IsInherited : False# InheritanceFlags : None# PropagationFlags : None # To see DACL in SDDL format (Security Descriptor Definition Language):$acl.Sddl# O:BA # Owner: BUILTIN\Administrators# G:BA # Group: BUILTIN\Administrators # D:PAI # DACL: Protected, Auto-Inherited# (A;;FA;;;SY) # Allow Full Access to SYSTEM# (A;;FA;;;BA) # Allow Full Access to Administrators# (A;;0x1301bf;;;S-1-5-21-...) # Allow specific permissions to SIDSDDL (Security Descriptor Definition Language) is Windows' text format for security descriptors. The format is 'ACE_TYPE;ACE_FLAGS;ACCESS_MASK;OBJECT_GUID;INHERIT_OBJECT_GUID;SID'. For example, '(A;;FA;;;BA)' means Allow (A), no flags, Full Access (FA), to BUILTIN\Administrators (BA). SDDL is essential for scripted security configuration and backups.
The permission mask (or access mask) is the heart of every ACE, specifying exactly which operations are allowed or denied. Both POSIX and Windows use bitmasks, but Windows provides much finer granularity.
POSIX Permission Bits:
POSIX uses a simple 3-bit mask for each entry:
| Bit | Value | Symbol | File Meaning | Directory Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bit 2 | 4 | r (read) | Read file contents | List directory contents (ls) |
| Bit 1 | 2 | w (write) | Modify file contents | Create/delete files in directory |
| Bit 0 | 1 | x (execute) | Execute as program | Enter directory (cd), access files within |
Windows Access Mask:
Windows uses a 32-bit access mask with both generic and object-specific permissions. The complete mask structure is:
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354
// Windows ACCESS_MASK is a 32-bit value:// // 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00// ├──┴──┴──┴──┤ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ├──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┤// Generic Rights SA MA WO WD Rsvd │ │ Standard Rights Object-Specific Rights// AC SC//// Bits 28-31: Generic rights (mapped to standard + specific by object type)// Bit 27: MAXIMUM_ALLOWED (request maximum permissions)// Bit 26-25: Reserved // Bit 24: ACCESS_SYSTEM_SECURITY (read/write SACL)// Bit 23-16: Standard access rights (common to all objects)// Bit 15-0: Object-specific access rights // Generic Rights (bits 28-31)#define GENERIC_ALL 0x10000000 // All permissions#define GENERIC_EXECUTE 0x20000000 // Execute/traverse#define GENERIC_WRITE 0x40000000 // Write data#define GENERIC_READ 0x80000000 // Read data // Standard Rights (bits 16-23)#define DELETE 0x00010000 // Delete the object#define READ_CONTROL 0x00020000 // Read security descriptor#define WRITE_DAC 0x00040000 // Modify DACL#define WRITE_OWNER 0x00080000 // Change owner#define SYNCHRONIZE 0x00100000 // Use for synchronization // File-Specific Rights (bits 0-15)#define FILE_READ_DATA 0x0001 // Read file contents#define FILE_WRITE_DATA 0x0002 // Write file contents#define FILE_APPEND_DATA 0x0004 // Append data#define FILE_READ_EA 0x0008 // Read extended attributes#define FILE_WRITE_EA 0x0010 // Write extended attributes#define FILE_EXECUTE 0x0020 // Execute file#define FILE_DELETE_CHILD 0x0040 // Delete children (directories)#define FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES 0x0080 // Read file attributes#define FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES 0x0100 // Write file attributes // Common composite rights#define FILE_GENERIC_READ (STANDARD_RIGHTS_READ | FILE_READ_DATA | \ FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES | FILE_READ_EA | SYNCHRONIZE) // = 0x00120089 #define FILE_GENERIC_WRITE (STANDARD_RIGHTS_WRITE | FILE_WRITE_DATA | \ FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES | FILE_WRITE_EA | \ FILE_APPEND_DATA | SYNCHRONIZE) // = 0x00120116 #define FILE_GENERIC_EXECUTE (STANDARD_RIGHTS_EXECUTE | FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES | \ FILE_EXECUTE | SYNCHRONIZE) // = 0x001200A0 #define FILE_ALL_ACCESS (STANDARD_RIGHTS_REQUIRED | SYNCHRONIZE | 0x1FF) // = 0x001F01FFNFSv4 ACLs were designed to bridge POSIX simplicity with Windows granularity. NFSv4 ACLs support 14 permission bits including READ_DATA, WRITE_DATA, APPEND_DATA, READ_ACL, WRITE_ACL, and more. Linux supports NFSv4 ACLs on some file systems (like ZFS), providing Windows-compatible fine-grained permissions on Unix systems.
Each ACE must identify who it applies to. This requires robust, unambiguous identification of security principals across system boundaries. The subject identifier mechanisms differ significantly between Unix and Windows.
POSIX: User IDs (UIDs) and Group IDs (GIDs)
Unix systems use simple 32-bit integers to identify users and groups. While simple, this approach has limitations in federated environments:
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
# UIDs and GIDs are simple integers$ id aliceuid=1000(alice) gid=1000(alice) groups=1000(alice),27(sudo),100(users) # In ACL entries, UIDs/GIDs are stored as 32-bit integers$ getfacl -n /project/file.txt # -n shows numeric IDs# file: project/file.txt# owner: 1000# group: 100user::rw-user:1001:r-- # UID 1001 (bob)user:1002:rw- # UID 1002 (charlie)group::r--group:200:r-- # GID 200 (marketing)mask::rw-other::--- # UID/GID mapping is resolved through NSS (Name Service Switch)$ getent passwd 1000alice:x:1000:1000:Alice Smith:/home/alice:/bin/bash # Well-known IDs:# UID 0: root (superuser)# GID 0: root/wheel group# UID 65534: nobody (unmapped/overflow)# GID 65534: nogroup # Limitations:# 1. IDs are local to the system (or must be synchronized)# 2. No way to distinguish "alice from server A" vs "alice from server B"# 3. Backup/restore across systems requires UID mapping# 4. No inherent structure or hierarchyWindows: Security Identifiers (SIDs)
Windows uses variable-length Security Identifiers that provide global uniqueness and support for domains and trust relationships:
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839
# SID Format: S-R-I-SA-SA-...-RID# S = Literal 'S' (identifies as SID)# R = Revision (always 1)# I = Identifier Authority (who issued the SID)# SA = Subauthority values (domain/machine identifiers)# RID = Relative ID (unique within the authority) # Example SID breakdown:# S-1-5-21-3623811015-3361044348-30300820-1013# │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────┘ └─┘# │ │ │ Domain ID RID# │ │ └── Identifier Authority: 5 = NT Authority# │ └──── Revision: 1# └────── SID marker # Well-known SIDs:S-1-1-0 # Everyone (World)S-1-5-18 # SYSTEM (LocalSystem account)S-1-5-19 # LOCAL SERVICES-1-5-20 # NETWORK SERVICES-1-5-32-544 # BUILTIN\AdministratorsS-1-5-32-545 # BUILTIN\UsersS-1-5-11 # Authenticated Users # View account SIDC:\> wmic useraccount where name='alice' get sidSIDS-1-5-21-3623811015-3361044348-30300820-1013 # Convert SID to nameC:\> powershell -c "(New-Object System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier('S-1-5-32-544')).Translate([System.Security.Principal.NTAccount]).Value"BUILTIN\Administrators # SID advantages:# 1. Globally unique (domain SID + RID ensures uniqueness)# 2. Survives username changes (SID remains same)# 3. Supports cross-domain/forest references# 4. Includes creation authority information# 5. Backup/restore preserves exact identities| Feature | POSIX UID/GID | Windows SID |
|---|---|---|
| Size | Fixed 32 bits | Variable (8-68 bytes typically) |
| Uniqueness | Local to system/namespace | Globally unique |
| Username change | Requires no update | Requires no update (both decouple name from ID) |
| Cross-system identity | Manual synchronization needed | Built-in domain support |
| Readability | Simple integer | Complex string/binary |
| Special identifiers | 0=root, 65534=nobody | Well-known SIDs for many built-in accounts |
| Group hierarchy | Flat namespace | Supports nested groups |
When moving files between systems, ACL subject identifiers may become orphaned if the referenced UID/SID doesn't exist on the target system. Unix shows numeric IDs for unknown users; Windows shows 'Account Unknown' or raw SIDs. Always use ACL-aware copy tools (rsync -A, robocopy /SEC) and verify identity resolution after migration.
Now let's apply our knowledge to construct ACL entries for real-world scenarios. We'll cover both POSIX and Windows approaches for common access control requirements.
Scenario 1: Shared Project Directory
Requirements:
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768
# Create directory and set owner$ mkdir /projects/alpha$ chown alice:devteam /projects/alpha # Set base permissions with setfacl# -m = modify (add or update entries) # Owner gets full control (this is set via USER_OBJ)$ setfacl -m u::rwx /projects/alpha # Development team (owning group) gets rwx$ setfacl -m g::rwx /projects/alpha # QA team gets read + execute$ setfacl -m g:qa:rx /projects/alpha # Auditor gets read only (and execute for directory traversal)$ setfacl -m u:auditor:rx /projects/alpha # Contractor gets explicit deny (empty permission set)$ setfacl -m u:contractor:--- /projects/alpha # Others get no access$ setfacl -m o::--- /projects/alpha # Set the mask to allow full permissions for named entries$ setfacl -m m::rwx /projects/alpha # Verify the complete ACL$ getfacl /projects/alpha# file: projects/alpha# owner: alice# group: devteamuser::rwxuser:auditor:r-xuser:contractor:---group::rwxgroup:qa:r-xmask::rwxother::--- # Set default ACL for inheritance (new files/dirs get these ACLs)$ setfacl -d -m u::rwx /projects/alpha$ setfacl -d -m g::rwx /projects/alpha$ setfacl -d -m g:qa:rx /projects/alpha$ setfacl -d -m u:auditor:rx /projects/alpha$ setfacl -d -m u:contractor:--- /projects/alpha$ setfacl -d -m o::--- /projects/alpha$ setfacl -d -m m::rwx /projects/alpha $ getfacl /projects/alpha# file: projects/alpha# owner: alice# group: devteamuser::rwxuser:auditor:r-xuser:contractor:---group::rwxgroup:qa:r-xmask::rwxother::---default:user::rwxdefault:user:auditor:r-xdefault:user:contractor:---default:group::rwxdefault:group:qa:r-xdefault:mask::rwxdefault:other::---Notice that in the Windows icacls output, the DENY ACE for contractor appears first. Windows canonically orders ACEs with explicit deny before allow, and inherited entries after non-inherited. The icacls and PowerShell cmdlets handle this ordering automatically, but if you manipulate ACLs programmatically, ensure proper ordering or access checks may not behave as expected.
ACE flags modify how entries are interpreted and inherited. Understanding these flags is essential for creating ACLs that behave correctly as files and directories are created, copied, and modified.
Windows ACE Flags:
| Flag | icacls | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| OBJECT_INHERIT_ACE | (OI) | ACE is inherited by files in this directory |
| CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE | (CI) | ACE is inherited by subdirectories |
| NO_PROPAGATE_INHERIT_ACE | (NP) | Inheritance stops at immediate children |
| INHERIT_ONLY_ACE | (IO) | ACE applies only to children, not this object |
| INHERITED_ACE | (I) | Indicates this ACE was inherited (not explicit) |
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435
# Common inheritance patterns: # Full inheritance (directories and files, all levels)(OI)(CI) # Container + Object inherit # Files only (not subdirectories)(OI) # Object inherit only # Subdirectories only (not files)(CI) # Container inherit only # Immediate children only (no grandchildren)(OI)(CI)(NP) # Object + Container + No Propagate # Children only, not this directory itself(OI)(CI)(IO) # Inherit-only: ACE applies to new items, not this dir # Example: Log directory structure# /logs# - Admins: Full control (including this dir and all descendants)# - LogService: Write new files only (can't read, can't delete)# - Auditors: Read existing files only (can't create new) C:\> icacls C:\Logs /inheritance:rC:\> icacls C:\Logs /grant "Administrators:(OI)(CI)F" # LogService can create files (write to directory) but inherit-only# means the permission applies to files it createsC:\> icacls C:\Logs /grant "LogService:(CI)WD" # Write to directoryC:\> icacls C:\Logs /grant "LogService:(OI)(IO)M" # Modify files (IO=children only) # Auditors can only read existing files, not create new onesC:\> icacls C:\Logs /grant "Auditors:(OI)R" # Read files# Note: No (CI) means subdirs don't inherit# No write to directory means can't create filesPOSIX Default ACLs (Inheritance Equivalent):
POSIX uses a separate "default ACL" on directories rather than flags on individual entries. The default ACL specifies what ACL new entries should receive:
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748
# Default ACLs only exist on directories# They specify the access ACL that new files/directories will receive # Set a default ACL on a directory$ setfacl -d -m u::rwx,g::rx,o::---,u:bob:rx /shared # View default ACL (prefixed with "default:")$ getfacl /shared# file: shared# owner: alice# group: staffuser::rwxgroup::rwxother::r-xdefault:user::rwxdefault:user:bob:r-xdefault:group::r-xdefault:mask::r-xdefault:other::--- # When a new file is created:$ touch /shared/newfile.txt$ getfacl /shared/newfile.txt# file: shared/newfile.txt# owner: alice# group: staffuser::rw- # From default (modified by umask for files)user:bob:r-- # Bob inherited from defaultgroup::r--mask::r--other::--- # New directories inherit both access and default ACLs:$ mkdir /shared/subdir$ getfacl /shared/subdir# file: shared/subdir# owner: alice # group: staffuser::rwxuser:bob:r-xgroup::r-xmask::r-xother::---default:user::rwxdefault:user:bob:r-xdefault:group::r-xdefault:mask::r-xdefault:other::--- # Default ACL is also inherited!In POSIX, even when the default ACL includes execute permission, newly created files do not receive execute permission unless the creating process explicitly requests it. This is a safety feature—text files shouldn't become executable. Directories always get execute bits from the default ACL because execute on a directory means 'searchable', not 'executable'.
ACL entries are the fundamental building blocks of fine-grained access control. Mastering their construction and interpretation is essential for implementing secure, functional access policies. Let's consolidate the key concepts:
What's Next:
With ACL entries mastered, we'll explore default permissions in the next page. You'll learn how systems determine the initial ACL for newly created objects, how umask and default ACLs interact, and how to configure sensible defaults for different environments.
You now have deep knowledge of ACL entry anatomy across POSIX and Windows systems. You understand entry types, permission bitmasks, subject identifiers, and inheritance flags. You can construct precise ACL entries for complex access control requirements. Next, we'll explore how default permissions work when new objects are created.