Loading learning content...
A storage array boasts 100 GB/s aggregate bandwidth. A network fabric promises 400 Gbps between racks. Yet applications report transfer speeds of 10 GB/s and 40 Gbps respectively. Where did the other 90% go?
The gap between available bandwidth and utilized bandwidth is one of the most pervasive challenges in I/O systems engineering. Raw hardware specifications tell only part of the story. Protocol overhead consumes capacity. Contention between workloads causes interference. Inefficient access patterns leave channels idle. Configuration mismatches cause bottlenecks.
Bandwidth utilization measures how effectively systems convert raw capacity into useful work. A system achieving 95% utilization extracts maximum value from infrastructure investments. One achieving 30% wastes resources—or worse, delivers poor performance while appearing underloaded. Understanding and optimizing bandwidth utilization is essential for both cost efficiency and performance excellence.
By the end of this page, you will understand how to measure and analyze bandwidth utilization, identify efficiency losses across the I/O stack, understand contention effects in shared resources, and apply strategies for maximizing the productive use of I/O bandwidth.
Bandwidth utilization is the ratio of actual data transfer rate to maximum available bandwidth:
$$U = \frac{B_{actual}}{B_{max}} \times 100%$$
Where:
However, this simple formula obscures important nuances. What exactly constitutes "actual" bandwidth? And what is the appropriate baseline for "maximum"?
| Bandwidth Type | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Raw/Wire Bandwidth | Physical signaling capacity of the interface | PCIe 4.0 x4: 64 Gbps raw |
| Encoded Bandwidth | Available after line coding overhead | PCIe 4.0 x4: 62.7 Gbps (128b/130b) |
| Protocol Bandwidth | Available for payload after protocol headers | NVMe over PCIe: ~61 Gbps effective |
| Useful Bandwidth | Data valuable to the application | After deduplication: varies by workload |
Utilization Efficiency Chain
Effective utilization is the product of efficiencies at each layer:
$$U_{effective} = \eta_{encoding} \times \eta_{protocol} \times \eta_{overhead} \times \eta_{access} \times \eta_{contention}$$
Where:
Example Analysis: A PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD under random 4KB reads:
Result: 0.81 / 8.0 = 10.1% utilization — but this is optimal for this workload!
Low bandwidth utilization isn't inherently problematic. Random small I/O workloads are IOPS-bound, not bandwidth-bound. A database server achieving 50 MB/s on a 7 GB/s NVMe drive may be perfectly optimized—it's simply doing 500,000 IOPS of 100-byte reads rather than streaming large files. Context matters when evaluating utilization metrics.
Accurate bandwidth utilization measurement requires understanding what to measure and how to interpret results in context.
Key Utilization Metrics
| Metric | Description | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Instantaneous Utilization | Current bandwidth use at measurement point | Useful for real-time dashboards; noisy |
| Average Utilization | Mean utilization over time window | Good for capacity planning; hides bursts |
| Peak Utilization | Maximum utilization during period | Identifies saturation events |
| Sustained Utilization | Utilization during active transfer periods | Measures efficiency when system is working |
| Busy Time Utilization | % time with any activity × utilization during activity | Separates idle time from inefficiency |
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192
"""Bandwidth Utilization Analysis Framework Provides comprehensive utilities for measuring, analyzing, and reporting bandwidth utilization across I/O subsystems.""" import timefrom dataclasses import dataclassfrom typing import List, Optionalimport subprocessimport re @dataclassclass BandwidthSample: """Single bandwidth measurement sample.""" timestamp: float bytes_read: int bytes_written: int device_busy_pct: float # 0-100 @dataclass class UtilizationReport: """Comprehensive utilization analysis.""" device: str max_bandwidth_mbps: float # Throughput metrics avg_read_mbps: float avg_write_mbps: float peak_read_mbps: float peak_write_mbps: float # Utilization metrics avg_utilization_pct: float peak_utilization_pct: float sustained_utilization_pct: float # During active periods only # Efficiency analysis read_write_ratio: float bandwidth_efficiency: float # Actual vs theoretical class BandwidthUtilizationAnalyzer: """ Analyzes bandwidth utilization for block devices. Uses /proc/diskstats on Linux for accurate measurement. """ def __init__(self, device: str, max_bandwidth_mbps: float): """ Initialize analyzer. Args: device: Device name (e.g., 'nvme0n1', 'sda') max_bandwidth_mbps: Theoretical max bandwidth in MB/s """ self.device = device self.max_bandwidth_mbps = max_bandwidth_mbps self.samples: List[BandwidthSample] = [] def collect_sample(self) -> BandwidthSample: """Collect current bandwidth utilization sample.""" # Read from /proc/diskstats with open('/proc/diskstats', 'r') as f: for line in f: fields = line.split() if len(fields) >= 14 and fields[2] == self.device: # Fields: major minor name rd_ios rd_mrg rd_sect rd_ticks # wr_ios wr_mrg wr_sect wr_ticks ios_inflight # io_ticks weighted_io_ticks bytes_read = int(fields[5]) * 512 # Sectors to bytes bytes_written = int(fields[9]) * 512 io_ticks = int(fields[12]) # ms active sample = BandwidthSample( timestamp=time.time(), bytes_read=bytes_read, bytes_written=bytes_written, device_busy_pct=0.0 # Calculated from successive samples ) self.samples.append(sample) return sample raise ValueError(f"Device {self.device} not found in /proc/diskstats") def collect_samples(self, duration_seconds: float, interval_seconds: float = 1.0): """Collect samples over a duration.""" end_time = time.time() + duration_seconds while time.time() < end_time: self.collect_sample() time.sleep(interval_seconds) def analyze(self) -> UtilizationReport: """Analyze collected samples to produce utilization report.""" if len(self.samples) < 2: raise ValueError("Need at least 2 samples for analysis") read_rates = [] write_rates = [] utilizations = [] for i in range(1, len(self.samples)): prev, curr = self.samples[i-1], self.samples[i] dt = curr.timestamp - prev.timestamp if dt <= 0: continue # Calculate rates in MB/s read_rate = (curr.bytes_read - prev.bytes_read) / dt / (1024 * 1024) write_rate = (curr.bytes_written - prev.bytes_written) / dt / (1024 * 1024) total_rate = read_rate + write_rate utilization = (total_rate / self.max_bandwidth_mbps) * 100 read_rates.append(read_rate) write_rates.append(write_rate) utilizations.append(min(utilization, 100)) # Cap at 100% # Calculate sustained utilization (only during active periods) active_utilizations = [u for u in utilizations if u > 1.0] # >1% = active sustained_util = sum(active_utilizations) / len(active_utilizations) if active_utilizations else 0 # Calculate read/write ratio total_read = sum(read_rates) total_write = sum(write_rates) rw_ratio = total_read / total_write if total_write > 0 else float('inf') return UtilizationReport( device=self.device, max_bandwidth_mbps=self.max_bandwidth_mbps, avg_read_mbps=sum(read_rates) / len(read_rates), avg_write_mbps=sum(write_rates) / len(write_rates), peak_read_mbps=max(read_rates), peak_write_mbps=max(write_rates), avg_utilization_pct=sum(utilizations) / len(utilizations), peak_utilization_pct=max(utilizations), sustained_utilization_pct=sustained_util, read_write_ratio=rw_ratio, bandwidth_efficiency=(sum(utilizations) / len(utilizations)) / 100 ) def print_report(self, report: UtilizationReport): """Print formatted utilization report.""" print(f"\n{'='*60}") print(f"Bandwidth Utilization Report: {report.device}") print(f"{'='*60}") print(f"Max Bandwidth: {report.max_bandwidth_mbps:.1f} MB/s") print() print("Throughput:") print(f" Average Read: {report.avg_read_mbps:8.2f} MB/s") print(f" Average Write: {report.avg_write_mbps:8.2f} MB/s") print(f" Peak Read: {report.peak_read_mbps:8.2f} MB/s") print(f" Peak Write: {report.peak_write_mbps:8.2f} MB/s") print() print("Utilization:") print(f" Average: {report.avg_utilization_pct:6.2f}%") print(f" Peak: {report.peak_utilization_pct:6.2f}%") print(f" Sustained: {report.sustained_utilization_pct:6.2f}%") print() print("Efficiency:") print(f" Read/Write Ratio: {report.read_write_ratio:.2f}") print(f" Bandwidth Efficiency: {report.bandwidth_efficiency:.1%}") # Provide recommendations print() print("Analysis:") if report.avg_utilization_pct < 20: print(" ⚠ Low average utilization - check for IOPS bottleneck or idle time") elif report.avg_utilization_pct > 80: print(" ⚠ High utilization - approaching saturation") else: print(" ✓ Healthy utilization range") if report.peak_utilization_pct > 95 and report.avg_utilization_pct < 50: print(" ⚠ Bursty workload - consider spreading load or adding caching") # Example usageif __name__ == "__main__": analyzer = BandwidthUtilizationAnalyzer( device="nvme0n1", max_bandwidth_mbps=7000 # PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe theoretical ) print("Collecting samples for 60 seconds...") analyzer.collect_samples(duration_seconds=60, interval_seconds=1.0) report = analyzer.analyze() analyzer.print_report(report)Monitoring Tools for Bandwidth Utilization
Linux provides several tools for bandwidth utilization monitoring:
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475
#!/bin/bash# Bandwidth Utilization Monitoring Commands # ============================================# STORAGE BANDWIDTH UTILIZATION# ============================================ # iostat with utilization (%util column)# Shows both throughput and device utilizationiostat -xm 1 # Example output interpretation:# Device r/s w/s rMB/s wMB/s %util# nvme0n1 1200 800 600 400 45%## This indicates:# - Total throughput: 600 + 400 = 1000 MB/s# - Device is busy 45% of the time# - If max bandwidth is 7000 MB/s: 1000/7000 = 14.3% bandwidth utilization# - But device is only busy 45% of time# - During busy time: 14.3% / 45% = ~32% sustained utilization # ============================================# NETWORK BANDWIDTH UTILIZATION# ============================================ # sar for network interface utilizationsar -n DEV 1 # More detailed with iftopsudo iftop -i eth0 -t -s 10 # Calculate utilization for 10 GbE link (1250 MB/s max)# If observing 800 MB/s: 800/1250 = 64% utilization # ============================================# PCIE BANDWIDTH UTILIZATION# ============================================ # Use perf with PCIe events (requires appropriate PMU support)sudo perf stat -e 'pci/r/w bytes' -a sleep 10 # Or use Intel PCM (Performance Counter Monitor)# Shows per-socket PCIe bandwidthsudo pcm-pcie # ============================================# MEMORY BANDWIDTH UTILIZATION# ============================================ # Intel PCM for memory bandwidthsudo pcm-memory 1 # Or use perf with memory controller eventssudo perf stat -e 'uncore_imc/cas_count_read/,uncore_imc/cas_count_write/' -a sleep 10 # ============================================# AUTOMATED UTILIZATION TRACKING# ============================================ # Log to file for historical analysis(while true; do echo "=== $(date) ===" >> /var/log/bandwidth_util.log iostat -xm 1 1 | tail -n +7 >> /var/log/bandwidth_util.log sleep 60done) & # Prometheus node_exporter provides:# - node_disk_read_bytes_total# - node_disk_written_bytes_total# - node_network_receive_bytes_total# - node_network_transmit_bytes_total# Calculate utilization as rate(metric) / max_bandwidthHigh utilization isn't the same as saturation. A device at 80% utilization handling workload efficiently is very different from a device at 80% utilization with a growing queue of pending requests. Monitor queue depth alongside utilization to distinguish healthy high utilization from saturation.
Multiple factors reduce bandwidth utilization efficiency. Understanding these sources enables targeted optimization.
Protocol and Encoding Overhead
Every I/O protocol consumes bandwidth for non-data purposes:
| Protocol/Layer | Overhead Type | Bandwidth Impact |
|---|---|---|
| PCIe 4.0 (128b/130b) | Line encoding | ~1.5% loss |
| NVMe Command | 64-byte submission queue entry | ~1.5% per 4KB I/O |
| NVMe Completion | 16-byte completion entry | ~0.4% per 4KB I/O |
| Ethernet (1500B MTU) | 14B header + 4B FCS + 12B IFG | ~2% loss |
| Ethernet (Jumbo MTU 9000B) | Same fixed overhead | ~0.3% loss |
| TCP/IP Headers | 40+ bytes per packet | ~2.7% for 1500B packets |
| SATA (8b/10b) | Line encoding | ~20% loss |
| USB 3.x | Packet framing + overhead | ~10-15% loss |
Access Pattern Inefficiency
How data is accessed dramatically affects utilization:
Small I/O Operations: The fixed overhead per operation consumes bandwidth proportionally more for small requests. A 64-byte NVMe command consumes 1.5% of a 4KB transfer but would be 50% of a 128-byte transfer.
Random Access: On HDDs, seek time creates dead time where no data flows. On SSDs, random access limits internal parallelism and increases flash read latency.
Read-Write Mixing: Many devices optimize for either reads or writes. Mixed patterns cause mode-switching overhead:, context switches in controllers and cache thrashing.
| Access Pattern | Typical Utilization Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Sequential large reads | 85-95% |
| Sequential large writes | 80-92% |
| Sequential small (4KB) reads | 50-70% |
| Random large reads | 40-60% |
| Random small (4KB) reads | 10-30% |
| Mixed random read/write | 8-25% |
Software Stack Overhead
Each software layer adds processing that limits sustainable throughput:
System Call Overhead: Transitioning between user and kernel mode costs ~100 ns-1 µs per call. At 1 million IOPS, this adds up.
Context Switching: Blocked I/O causes thread context switches (~1-10 µs each), wasting CPU cycles and cache coherency.
Data Copying: Data often copies multiple times: user buffer → kernel buffer → device buffer. Each copy consumes memory bandwidth and CPU cycles.
Interrupt Handling: Each I/O completion triggers an interrupt (~2-5 µs processing). At high IOPS, interrupt overhead becomes significant.
Allocation and Locking: Memory allocation and synchronization primitives in the I/O path add variable delays.
Device-Internal Inefficiencies
Even at the device level, bandwidth is lost:
Garbage Collection (SSDs): When free blocks are low, SSDs must compact data, consuming internal bandwidth. This can reduce available bandwidth by 30-50% under sustained writes.
Wear Leveling: Moving data to even wear adds overhead, particularly impactful when data is moved from idle blocks.
Error Correction: LDPC decoding in SSDs, error retry in HDDs consume processing time that reduces throughput.
Thermal Throttling: Sustained high throughput causes temperature increases, triggering reduced performance modes.
Power State Transitions: Low-power states require wake-up time (1-50 ms for HDDs, 10-100 µs for SSDs), causing delays after idle periods.
These inefficiencies multiply rather than add. A 90% efficient protocol running over a 90% efficient stack with a 50% efficient access pattern and 80% efficient device yields: 0.9 × 0.9 × 0.5 × 0.8 = 32.4% overall efficiency. This explains why practical throughput is often a fraction of theoretical maximums.
In real systems, I/O resources are rarely dedicated to single workloads. Contention between competing demands reduces effective bandwidth available to each.
Types of Resource Contention
Modeling Contention Effects
When N equal workloads contend for a shared resource with capacity C, naively each receives C/N. Reality is worse due to contention overhead:
$$B_{per_workload} = \frac{C \times \eta_{contention}}{N}$$
Where η_contention accounts for:
Typical values for η_contention:
| Scenario | η_contention |
|---|---|
| Dedicated device | 1.0 |
| 2 similar workloads | 0.95-0.98 |
| 2-4 diverse workloads | 0.85-0.95 |
| 5-10 workloads | 0.75-0.90 |
| Many small workloads | 0.60-0.80 |
| VM/container multi-tenancy | 0.50-0.80 |
The "Noisy Neighbor" Problem
In multi-tenant environments, one aggressive workload can consume disproportionate resources:
Symptom: Application A's throughput drops 50% when Application B starts a backup job.
Cause: Application B issues large sequential I/Os that monopolize device bandwidth and cause queue head-of-line blocking.
Solutions:
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
#!/bin/bash# Bandwidth Management with cgroups v2# Isolate workloads and prevent noisy neighbor effects # Enable cgroup v2 controllersecho "+io +cpu +memory" > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control # ============================================# Create isolated cgroups for different workloads# ============================================ # High priority workload (production database)mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/prod-dbecho "256:0 rbps=3000000000 wbps=2000000000" > /sys/fs/cgroup/prod-db/io.max# Device 256:0 (check with lsblk), read 3GB/s, write 2GB/s # Low priority workload (backup job) mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/backupecho "256:0 rbps=500000000 wbps=500000000" > /sys/fs/cgroup/backup/io.max# Limited to 500MB/s read and write # Best-effort workload (dev/test)mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/devecho "256:0 rbps=max wbps=max" > /sys/fs/cgroup/dev/io.maxecho "256:0 100" > /sys/fs/cgroup/dev/io.weight # Lower weight for fair sharing # ============================================# Set I/O priority weights (relative scheduling)# ============================================ # Higher weight = higher priority in contention# Range: 1-10000, default 100 echo "256:0 500" > /sys/fs/cgroup/prod-db/io.weight # 5x priorityecho "256:0 50" > /sys/fs/cgroup/backup/io.weight # 0.5x priority echo "256:0 100" > /sys/fs/cgroup/dev/io.weight # Normal # ============================================# Launch processes in cgroups# ============================================ # Run database in prod cgroupecho $DATABASE_PID > /sys/fs/cgroup/prod-db/cgroup.procs # Run backup in limited cgroupcgexec -g io:backup /usr/bin/backup-script.sh # ============================================# Monitor per-cgroup I/O# ============================================ # View current I/O statistics per cgroupcat /sys/fs/cgroup/*/io.stat # Example output:# 256:0 rbytes=1234567890 wbytes=987654321 rios=12345 wios=9876 dbytes=0 dios=0 # ============================================# NUMA-aware bandwidth isolation# ============================================ # Bind to specific NUMA node for consistent performanceecho "0" > /sys/fs/cgroup/prod-db/cpuset.memsecho "0-7" > /sys/fs/cgroup/prod-db/cpuset.cpus # This ensures database traffic uses NUMA-local memory# and PCIe paths, reducing cross-socket bandwidth contentionDon't wait for noisy neighbor complaints. Establish bandwidth budgets upfront, implement per-workload limits, and monitor for violations. Quota enforcement is easier to implement and explain than reactive throttling during incidents.
Improving bandwidth utilization requires systematic optimization across hardware configuration, system tuning, and application design.
Hardware Configuration Strategies
System Tuning Strategies
OS configuration significantly impacts achievable utilization:
| Tuning Area | Parameter | Optimization |
|---|---|---|
| I/O Scheduler | none/mq-deadline for NVMe | Reduces scheduling overhead for devices that handle queuing internally |
| Queue Depth | nr_requests 1024+ | Allows more concurrent I/O to keep device busy |
| Read Ahead | read_ahead_kb 16384 | Prefetches sequential data; reduces I/O wait cycles |
| Dirty Pages | dirty_ratio 40% | Buffers more writes; improves sustained write throughput |
| Kernel Bypass | io_uring sq_poll | Kernel polls for completions; reduces syscall overhead |
| Interrupt Coalescing | Device-specific | Batches interrupts; trades latency for throughput |
| NUMA Balancing | Disable for I/O nodes | Prevents migration that disrupts DMA mappings |
Application Design Strategies
Application architecture often has the largest impact on utilization:
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153
/** * High-Bandwidth I/O Pattern Using io_uring * * Demonstrates techniques for maximizing bandwidth utilization: * - Large aligned I/O requests (1MB) * - Deep queue depth (64 outstanding) * - Kernel-side polling to reduce syscall overhead * - Registered buffers to avoid memory mapping overhead */ #include <stdio.h>#include <stdlib.h>#include <fcntl.h>#include <string.h>#include <liburing.h> #define QUEUE_DEPTH 64#define BLOCK_SIZE (1024 * 1024) // 1MB blocks for high bandwidth#define NUM_BLOCKS 1024 struct io_data { int fd; off_t offset; struct iovec iov;}; /** * Initialize io_uring with optimal settings for bandwidth */int setup_io_uring(struct io_uring *ring) { struct io_uring_params params = {0}; // Enable kernel-side polling (reduces syscalls) params.flags = IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL; params.sq_thread_idle = 1000; // ms before kernel thread sleeps int ret = io_uring_queue_init_params(QUEUE_DEPTH, ring, ¶ms); if (ret < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "io_uring init failed: %d\n", ret); return -1; } return 0;} /** * Submit read requests to fill queue */int submit_reads(struct io_uring *ring, int fd, void **buffers, off_t *offsets, int count) { for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) { struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring); if (!sqe) { // Queue full, submit and wait for space io_uring_submit(ring); sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring); } // Prepare read with pre-allocated aligned buffer io_uring_prep_read(sqe, fd, buffers[i], BLOCK_SIZE, offsets[i]); // Store index for completion tracking io_uring_sqe_set_data(sqe, (void*)(long)i); } return io_uring_submit(ring);} /** * Process completions and resubmit new reads */int process_completions(struct io_uring *ring) { struct io_uring_cqe *cqe; unsigned head; int completed = 0; io_uring_for_each_cqe(ring, head, cqe) { if (cqe->res < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "I/O error: %d\n", cqe->res); } else if (cqe->res != BLOCK_SIZE) { fprintf(stderr, "Short read: %d\n", cqe->res); } completed++; } if (completed > 0) { io_uring_cq_advance(ring, completed); } return completed;} /** * Main high-bandwidth read loop */int high_bandwidth_read(const char *path, size_t total_bytes) { struct io_uring ring; int fd; // Open with O_DIRECT for direct device access fd = open(path, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECT); if (fd < 0) { perror("open"); return -1; } if (setup_io_uring(&ring) < 0) { close(fd); return -1; } // Allocate aligned buffers void *buffers[QUEUE_DEPTH]; off_t offsets[QUEUE_DEPTH]; for (int i = 0; i < QUEUE_DEPTH; i++) { posix_memalign(&buffers[i], BLOCK_SIZE, BLOCK_SIZE); offsets[i] = (off_t)i * BLOCK_SIZE; } // Initial submission to fill queue submit_reads(&ring, fd, buffers, offsets, QUEUE_DEPTH); size_t bytes_read = 0; off_t next_offset = QUEUE_DEPTH * BLOCK_SIZE; while (bytes_read < total_bytes) { // Wait for at least one completion struct io_uring_cqe *cqe; io_uring_wait_cqe(&ring, &cqe); // Process all available completions int completed = process_completions(&ring); bytes_read += completed * BLOCK_SIZE; // Resubmit to maintain queue depth for (int i = 0; i < completed && next_offset < total_bytes; i++) { struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(&ring); io_uring_prep_read(sqe, fd, buffers[i], BLOCK_SIZE, next_offset); next_offset += BLOCK_SIZE; } io_uring_submit(&ring); } // Cleanup io_uring_queue_exit(&ring); for (int i = 0; i < QUEUE_DEPTH; i++) { free(buffers[i]); } close(fd); return 0;}For sustained workloads, target 75-85% bandwidth utilization. This leaves headroom for bursts and variability while extracting most of the available capacity. Operating constantly at 95%+ risks saturation during demand spikes and causes latency degradation.
Understanding common utilization patterns helps diagnose issues and optimize systems.
Pattern 1: Sustained High Utilization
Signature: Consistently >85% utilization over extended periods
Causes:
Implications:
Actions:
Pattern 2: Bursty Utilization
Signature: Low average (20-40%) with high peaks (>90%)
Causes:
Implications:
Actions:
Pattern 3: Persistently Low Utilization
Signature: Consistently <30% despite perceived performance issues
Causes:
Implications:
Actions:
Chart utilization over time at multiple granularities (seconds, minutes, hours). Daily and weekly patterns reveal batch job impacts. Correlate utilization with latency, queue depth, and application metrics to understand whether observed utilization is healthy or problematic.
Bandwidth utilization measures how effectively I/O systems convert raw capacity into useful work. Achieving high utilization requires understanding the efficiency chain from physical interface to application layer.
What's Next
With throughput, latency, and utilization understood, the next page examines hardware bottlenecks—the physical constraints that limit I/O performance regardless of software optimization. We'll explore how to identify, diagnose, and address hardware-level limitations.
You now understand bandwidth utilization comprehensively: how to measure it, sources of inefficiency, contention effects, and optimization strategies. This knowledge enables you to maximize the value extracted from I/O infrastructure investments.