Loading learning content...
When a transaction fails and its rollback completes, it enters the Aborted state. This is the terminal state for unsuccessful transactions—the point where the database has completely erased all evidence of the transaction's existence as if it never happened.
The Aborted state is the mirror image of the Committed state:
Both are terminal states—once reached, the transaction's lifecycle is complete. But while Committed transactions leave their mark on the database forever, Aborted transactions leave no trace whatsoever in the final database state.
Understanding the Aborted state completes our picture of the transaction state machine and provides crucial insight into how databases maintain atomicity—the 'A' in ACID.
By the end of this page, you will understand the formal definition of the Aborted state, comprehend what 'cleaned up' means at a technical level, learn how abort affects concurrency and locks, understand retry strategies after abort, and see the complete transaction state diagram in its entirety.
Let's establish a precise understanding of what it means for a transaction to be in the Aborted state.
Formal Definition:
A transaction T is in the Aborted state if and only if:
Using formal notation:
T ∈ Aborted ⟺
(previous_state(T) = Failed) ∧
(rollback_complete(T) = true) ∧
(changes_undone(T) = true) ∧
(locks_released(T) = true) ∧
(resources_freed(T) = true)
Key Characteristics of the Aborted State:
| Property | Value | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| State Type | Terminal (final) | No more transitions possible |
| Data Effect | None | Database unchanged from before transaction |
| Visible Changes | None | Other transactions see pre-transaction state |
| Locks | Released | No resources blocked |
| Log Records | Remain | ABORT record in log for recovery information |
| Transaction Descriptor | Deallocated | Memory freed |
The Aborted state is the embodiment of the Atomicity property. Atomicity guarantees 'all or nothing'—either a transaction's changes are fully applied (Committed), or they are fully reversed (Aborted). There is no in-between state where some changes persist and others don't.
The Complete Transaction State Diagram:
With the Aborted state, we can now present the complete transaction state machine:
While we say an aborted transaction leaves 'no trace' in the database, this is true from the perspective of data but not from the perspective of system internals. Let's examine what remains and what is removed.
What Is Removed (The User Perspective):
From the application's viewpoint, an aborted transaction might as well have never happened:
What Remains (The System Perspective):
While user-visible effects are erased, the system retains some information:
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
-- Sequence values are NOT rolled back-- This is a common source of confusion CREATE SEQUENCE order_id_seq; -- Transaction 1:BEGIN;INSERT INTO orders (id, ...) VALUES (nextval('order_id_seq'), ...);-- Gets order_id = 1ROLLBACK; -- Transaction aborted -- Transaction 2:BEGIN; INSERT INTO orders (id, ...) VALUES (nextval('order_id_seq'), ...);-- Gets order_id = 2, NOT 1!COMMIT; -- Result: order_id 1 is "missing" from the orders table-- This is a feature, not a bug - sequences are designed for -- high concurrency and don't participate in transaction rollback -- Same behavior applies to:-- Serial columns (use sequences internally)-- Identity columns-- Some auto-increment implementationsNot everything can be rolled back: (1) Sequence values are consumed and not returned, (2) DDL in some databases auto-commits and can't be rolled back, (3) External API calls made during the transaction remain, (4) Files written to disk by procedures aren't removed, (5) Notifications/alerts sent are not recalled. Design your transactions with these limitations in mind.
When a transaction reaches the Aborted state, all its locks are released. This has important implications for other transactions that may have been waiting.
Lock Release Sequence:
Impact on Waiting Transactions:
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526
-- Demonstrating how abort releases locks and unblocks waiters -- Session 1: Acquire exclusive lockBEGIN;UPDATE accounts SET balance = 1000 WHERE id = 100;-- Holds X lock on row id=100 -- Session 2: Tries to access same row, BLOCKSBEGIN;UPDATE accounts SET balance = 2000 WHERE id = 100;-- Waiting... (blocked by Session 1's X lock) -- Session 3: Also waiting for same rowBEGIN;SELECT * FROM accounts WHERE id = 100 FOR UPDATE;-- Also waiting... -- Session 1: Encounters error or decides to rollbackROLLBACK; -- Transitions: Failed → (rollback) → Aborted-- All locks released! -- Session 2 and 3: Now unblocked!-- One of them acquires the lock and proceeds-- The other waits for the new lock holder -- After Session 2 completes, Session 3 can proceedThe Cascading Effect:
When a long-running transaction aborts, it may trigger a 'cascade' of activity:
This is why long-running transactions are problematic—their abort can cause as much disruption as their execution.
Read Consistency After Abort:
In MVCC systems, abort affects version visibility:
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930
-- MVCC visibility after abort -- Initial state: balance = 1000 -- Transaction T1:BEGIN;UPDATE accounts SET balance = 5000 WHERE id = 100;-- Creates new row version with T1's transaction ID-- Concurrent readers may or may not see this depending on snapshots -- Transaction T2 (started after T1's update):BEGIN ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED;SELECT balance FROM accounts WHERE id = 100;-- May see 5000 if T1 committed, or 1000 if T1 is uncommitted/aborted-- Visibility check says: "Is T1 committed?" No → show old version -- T1 aborts:ROLLBACK; -- T1 is now marked as aborted -- T2's next read:SELECT balance FROM accounts WHERE id = 100;-- Returns 1000 - the original value-- The new version created by T1 is marked as created by an aborted -- transaction and is therefore invisible (and will be vacuumed later) COMMIT; -- The row version T1 created still physically exists on disk-- But it's effectively invisible - no transaction will ever see it-- VACUUM will eventually remove itIn MVCC databases, aborted transactions leave 'dead' row versions in the table. These are invisible to all transactions but consume space. Regular maintenance (VACUUM in PostgreSQL, InnoDB background threads in MySQL) cleans up these dead tuples. Heavy abort rates increase maintenance load.
How does the database treat aborted transactions during crash recovery? This is crucial for understanding the durability of abort decisions.
Scenario: Abort Before Crash
If a transaction was aborted before a crash:
Scenario: Active Transaction During Crash
If a transaction was active when crash occurred:
Scenario: Rollback In Progress During Crash
If crash occurred during rollback (transaction in Failed state):
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243
// Recovery processing for transactions that need to abort function recovery_undo_phase(active_transactions) { // active_transactions = transactions that were in Active or Failed // state at crash time (no COMMIT or complete ABORT in log) undo_list = active_transactions.copy() // Process log from end to beginning current_lsn = log.end_position() while undo_list is not empty: record = read_log_record(current_lsn) if record.transaction_id in undo_list: if record.type == CLR: // This is a compensation record - skip to undo-next-lsn // The original operation was already undone before crash current_lsn = record.undo_next_lsn if record.undo_next_lsn == NULL: // This transaction's rollback is complete write_abort_record(record.transaction_id) undo_list.remove(record.transaction_id) continue elif record.type == UPDATE: // Need to undo this update page = read_page(record.page_id) if page.lsn >= record.lsn: // Page has this update; undo it apply_undo(record.old_value) write_clr(record.transaction_id, record) elif record.type == BEGIN: // Reached the beginning of this transaction write_abort_record(record.transaction_id) undo_list.remove(record.transaction_id) current_lsn = record.prev_lsn // All previously active transactions are now Aborted}Once a transaction reaches the Aborted state (whether through normal execution or recovery), it remains aborted permanently. The ABORT record in the log ensures this is durable. If there's another crash after recovery, the already-aborted transactions won't be processed again—their ABORT records indicate they're already handled.
When a transaction is aborted, the application must decide whether and how to retry. This decision depends on why the abort occurred and the nature of the operation.
Framework for Retry Decisions:
| Abort Cause | Retry? | Strategy | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deadlock victim | Yes | Immediate retry with backoff | Two transfers deadlocked |
| Serialization failure | Yes | Immediate retry | MVCC conflict |
| Lock timeout | Yes | Retry with exponential backoff | Heavily contended rows |
| Constraint violation | No* | Fix data, then retry | Duplicate primary key |
| Explicit user cancel | No | N/A - intentional | User clicked Cancel |
| System resource exhaustion | Yes | Wait, then retry | Out of memory |
| Connection lost | Yes | Reconnect and retry | Network hiccup |
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123
import timeimport randomfrom enum import Enumfrom dataclasses import dataclassfrom typing import Callable, TypeVar, Optional class AbortReason(Enum): DEADLOCK = "deadlock" SERIALIZATION = "serialization_failure" LOCK_TIMEOUT = "lock_timeout" CONSTRAINT = "constraint_violation" USER_CANCEL = "user_cancel" RESOURCE = "resource_exhaustion" CONNECTION = "connection_lost" UNKNOWN = "unknown" @dataclassclass RetryPolicy: max_attempts: int initial_delay: float # seconds max_delay: float exponential_base: float = 2.0 jitter: bool = True # Default policies by abort reasonDEFAULT_POLICIES = { AbortReason.DEADLOCK: RetryPolicy(max_attempts=5, initial_delay=0.01, max_delay=1.0), AbortReason.SERIALIZATION: RetryPolicy(max_attempts=5, initial_delay=0.01, max_delay=1.0), AbortReason.LOCK_TIMEOUT: RetryPolicy(max_attempts=3, initial_delay=0.5, max_delay=10.0), AbortReason.RESOURCE: RetryPolicy(max_attempts=3, initial_delay=1.0, max_delay=30.0), AbortReason.CONNECTION: RetryPolicy(max_attempts=3, initial_delay=0.5, max_delay=5.0), # These should not be retried automatically AbortReason.CONSTRAINT: None, AbortReason.USER_CANCEL: None, AbortReason.UNKNOWN: None,} T = TypeVar('T') def execute_with_smart_retry( operation: Callable[[], T], classify_error: Callable[[Exception], AbortReason], custom_policies: Optional[dict] = None) -> T: """ Execute an operation with intelligent retry logic based on abort reason. :param operation: Function to execute (should manage its own transaction) :param classify_error: Function to classify an exception into AbortReason :param custom_policies: Optional custom retry policies :return: Result of successful operation :raises: Last exception if all retries exhausted or non-retriable error """ policies = {**DEFAULT_POLICIES, **(custom_policies or {})} attempt = 0 last_error = None while True: try: return operation() except Exception as e: last_error = e reason = classify_error(e) policy = policies.get(reason) if policy is None: # Non-retriable error print(f"Non-retriable abort: {reason.value}") raise attempt += 1 if attempt > policy.max_attempts: print(f"Max retries ({policy.max_attempts}) exceeded for {reason.value}") raise # Calculate delay with exponential backoff delay = min( policy.initial_delay * (policy.exponential_base ** (attempt - 1)), policy.max_delay ) # Add jitter to prevent thundering herd if policy.jitter: delay = delay * (0.5 + random.random()) print(f"Abort ({reason.value}), attempt {attempt}/{policy.max_attempts}, " f"retrying in {delay:.2f}s") time.sleep(delay) return None # Should never reach here # Example usagedef transfer_funds(from_id: int, to_id: int, amount: float): """Business operation that may be retried.""" with get_connection() as conn: with conn.cursor() as cur: cur.execute("BEGIN") # ... perform transfer ... conn.commit() def classify_postgres_error(e: Exception) -> AbortReason: """Classify PostgreSQL errors into retry categories.""" if hasattr(e, 'pgcode'): code = e.pgcode if code == '40001': return AbortReason.SERIALIZATION elif code == '40P01': return AbortReason.DEADLOCK elif code in ('23505', '23503', '23502', '23514'): return AbortReason.CONSTRAINT elif code.startswith('08'): return AbortReason.CONNECTION return AbortReason.UNKNOWN # Execute with retryresult = execute_with_smart_retry( lambda: transfer_funds(1, 2, 100.00), classify_postgres_error)Before retrying an aborted transaction, ensure the operation is idempotent—running it twice should have the same effect as running it once. If the transaction was partially visible to other transactions (shouldn't happen with proper isolation, but edge cases exist), retrying might cause duplicate effects. Use unique transaction identifiers to detect and handle duplicates.
Monitoring abort patterns helps identify system problems and application issues. Here's how to track aborted transactions across different database systems.
Key Metrics to Monitor:
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
-- Calculate abort/rollback rate by databaseSELECT datname, xact_commit AS commits, xact_rollback AS rollbacks, ROUND(100.0 * xact_rollback / NULLIF(xact_commit + xact_rollback, 0), 2) AS abort_percentage, conflicts AS replication_conflictsFROM pg_stat_databaseWHERE datname NOT LIKE 'template%'ORDER BY abort_percentage DESC; -- Healthy systems typically see < 1% abort rate-- > 5% abort rate suggests problems -- Monitor conflict-specific aborts (replication)SELECT datname, confl_tablespace, confl_lock, confl_snapshot, confl_bufferpin, confl_deadlock, (confl_tablespace + confl_lock + confl_snapshot + confl_bufferpin + confl_deadlock) AS total_conflictsFROM pg_stat_database_conflicts; -- Dead tuple accumulation (indicates abort/update activity)SELECT schemaname, relname, n_live_tup, n_dead_tup, ROUND(100.0 * n_dead_tup / NULLIF(n_live_tup + n_dead_tup, 0), 2) AS dead_tuple_pct, last_vacuum, last_autovacuumFROM pg_stat_user_tablesWHERE n_dead_tup > 1000ORDER BY n_dead_tup DESC;Alerting Thresholds:
Set up alerts based on your system's baseline. Example thresholds:
| Metric | Warning | Critical | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abort rate | 2% | 5% | Baseline depends on application |
| Deadlocks/hour | 10 | 50 | Should be near zero normally |
| Avg rollback time | 100ms | 1s | Long rollbacks block resources |
| Dead tuple ratio | 10% | 25% | May indicate vacuum issues |
| Lock wait time | 1s avg | 5s avg | Indicates contention |
A sudden increase in abort rate is more concerning than a stable but slightly elevated rate. Establish baselines during normal operation, then alert on significant deviations. Correlate abort spikes with deployments, traffic patterns, or system changes.
While some aborts are unavoidable (and even desirable—like aborting on constraint violations), excessive aborts waste resources and hurt performance. Here are best practices to minimize unnecessary aborts:
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
-- Techniques to prevent unnecessary aborts -- 1. Use ON CONFLICT instead of letting constraint abortINSERT INTO users (email, name)VALUES ('alice@example.com', 'Alice')ON CONFLICT (email) DO UPDATE SET name = EXCLUDED.name;-- Never aborts on duplicate email -- 2. Use SELECT FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED for queue processing-- Instead of waiting and risking deadlock/timeout:BEGIN;SELECT * FROM job_queue WHERE status = 'pending'ORDER BY created_atLIMIT 1FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED; -- Skip rows locked by other transactions-- Process the job...COMMIT; -- 3. Use advisory locks for coordinating without row locksSELECT pg_advisory_lock(12345); -- Acquire advisory lock-- Do work that would otherwise contend on rowsSELECT pg_advisory_unlock(12345); -- 4. Check before attempting operationsDO $$DECLARE current_balance DECIMAL;BEGIN -- Check first (outside main logic) SELECT balance INTO current_balance FROM accounts WHERE id = 100; IF current_balance < 500 THEN RAISE EXCEPTION 'Insufficient balance'; END IF; -- Now do the actual update UPDATE accounts SET balance = balance - 500 WHERE id = 100;END $$;Some aborts are correct behavior: constraint violations protecting data integrity, serialization failures maintaining correctness, user cancellations respecting user intent. The goal is to minimize UNNECESSARY aborts from poor design, not to eliminate all aborts. A system with zero aborts might be missing important integrity checks.
We've completed our exploration of the transaction state machine with the Aborted state—the terminal state for unsuccessful transactions. Let's consolidate our understanding:
Module Complete: Transaction States
You've now mastered the complete transaction state model:
This state machine is fundamental to understanding how databases maintain ACID properties, especially Atomicity (A) and Durability (D). Every transaction you ever execute follows this state model, whether you're aware of it or not.
Congratulations! You now have a comprehensive understanding of transaction states—from Active through to the terminal states of Committed and Aborted. This knowledge is essential for designing reliable applications, troubleshooting transaction-related issues, and understanding database behavior during both normal operation and recovery scenarios.