Wireless LAN Overview

Walk into any modern office, coffee shop, airport, or home, and you'll witness an invisible revolution that has fundamentally transformed how humanity connects. Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) have liberated computing from the constraints of physical cables, enabling seamless connectivity that our ancestors—even those from just three decades ago—would consider magical.

But this magic comes at a price. The very characteristics that make wireless networking liberating also introduce a constellation of engineering challenges that wired networks never face. Radio waves don't respect walls. They fade over distance. They interfere with each other. They can be eavesdropped upon by anyone with an antenna. Understanding these characteristics isn't just academic—it's the foundation upon which all wireless network design, troubleshooting, and security decisions rest.

At its core, wireless communication relies on electromagnetic radiation—specifically, radio waves in the frequency bands allocated for WiFi communication. Unlike wired communication, where electrical signals travel through a guided medium (copper cables) or light pulses traverse fiber optics, wireless signals propagate through the air, walls, and even space itself.

The Medium is the Message (and the Problem):

In wired Ethernet, the transmission medium is a dedicated, controlled cable connecting exactly two endpoints. The signal quality is predictable, interference is minimal, and the channel is essentially private. Wireless communication inverts every one of these assumptions:

• The medium is shared by all devices in range—your laptop, your neighbor's smart TV, the microwave oven, and thousands of other electromagnetic emitters
• The signal degrades unpredictably as it encounters walls, furniture, weather, and human bodies
• The channel is inherently public—any receiver tuned to the frequency can capture the transmission
• The propagation characteristics change constantly as people move, doors open, and the environment shifts

Understanding how radio waves behave in the real world is essential for anyone designing, deploying, or troubleshooting wireless networks. Radio propagation is governed by physics, and these physical laws create both opportunities and constraints for WLAN design.

Path Loss: The Inevitable Fading

As radio waves travel from transmitter to receiver, their power decreases according to the inverse square law. In free space, signal power decreases proportionally to the square of the distance. Double the distance, and you receive only one-quarter of the power. In practical indoor environments, the attenuation is often worse—following an inverse cube or even inverse fourth-power relationship due to additional losses from obstacles.

The Free Space Path Loss Formula:

FSPL (dB) = 20 × log₁₀(d) + 20 × log₁₀(f) + 20 × log₁₀(4π/c)

Where:

• d = distance between transmitter and receiver (meters)
• f = frequency of the signal (Hz)
• c = speed of light (≈ 3 × 10⁸ m/s)

This formula reveals a crucial insight: higher frequencies experience greater path loss. This is why 5 GHz WiFi networks have shorter range than 2.4 GHz networks, despite often providing higher data rates.

Attenuation Through Materials:

Different materials attenuate radio signals to varying degrees. Understanding these values helps predict coverage and plan access point placement:

One of the most misunderstood aspects of wireless networking is the relationship between advertised data rates and actual achievable throughput. Marketing materials proclaim speeds like "WiFi 6: Up to 9.6 Gbps!" while users struggle to get 100 Mbps in practice. This isn't deception—it's physics and protocol design.

The Bandwidth Reality:

Wireless bandwidth is fundamentally shared. Unlike a switch port that provides dedicated bandwidth to each connected device, an access point's radio capacity is divided among all associated stations. When the marketing claims "up to 1200 Mbps," that's the total capacity—split among every device connected.

Factors That Consume Wireless Capacity:

Rate Adaptation: The Dynamic Dance

Wireless devices continuously adjust their transmission rate based on channel conditions. This process, called rate adaptation or link adaptation, is crucial for maintaining connectivity:

• Higher rates use more complex modulation schemes that require better signal quality
• Lower rates use simpler modulation that works over longer distances and through more interference
• Rate adaptation algorithms observe frame success/failure and adjust accordingly
• The rate selection is per-frame and can change hundreds of times per second

This adaptive behavior means that a device's connection speed varies constantly. The "signal bars" on your phone represent signal strength, not speed—a device might have full bars but connect at a low rate due to interference, or have few bars but maintain a reasonable rate in a quiet RF environment.

One of the most significant characteristics distinguishing WLANs from wired Ethernet is their half-duplex nature. A wireless station cannot transmit and receive at the same time. This isn't a design choice—it's a fundamental physical constraint with far-reaching implications.

Why Half-Duplex is Unavoidable:

In a wired network with separate transmit and receive pairs, full-duplex communication is straightforward. But consider a wireless radio:

1. The transmitter overpowers the receiver: A typical WiFi transmission at 100 mW is about 10^12 times more powerful than the minimum signal a receiver can detect. If the transmitter and receiver operate simultaneously, the transmit signal completely overwhelms any received signal.

2. Shared antenna: Most WiFi devices use a single antenna (or antenna array) for both transmission and reception. The antenna can only be in one mode at a time.

3. Shared medium: Even with separate antennas, the radio waves share the same medium. Transmitting while receiving would be like trying to listen to someone whisper while you're shouting.

Implications for Network Design:

The Protocol Impact:

Half-duplex operation fundamentally shapes the 802.11 MAC layer. Consider the sequence for transmitting a single frame:

1. Sense the medium — Wait until no transmission is detected
2. Wait for DIFS — Distributed Inter-Frame Space (ensures fairness)
3. Contention window — Random backoff to reduce collision probability
4. Transmit frame — The actual data transmission
5. Wait for SIFS — Short Inter-Frame Space
6. Receive ACK — Confirmation from receiver

Every single frame incurs this overhead. In contrast, wired Ethernet can transmit continuously in both directions with minimal protocol overhead. This is why, despite impressive raw speeds, WiFi often feels slower than wired connections for interactive applications.

WLANs operate in unlicensed spectrum—frequency bands that anyone can use without a regulatory license. The primary WiFi bands (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) are shared with an enormous variety of other devices and technologies. This creates a challenging RF environment that network designers must navigate.

Sources of Interference:

Co-Channel Interference (CCI):

The most significant interference source for enterprise WLANs is typically other WiFi networks—including your own. When multiple access points use the same channel, they hear each other's transmissions. This causes:

• Deferred transmissions — Devices wait for the channel to clear, reducing aggregate throughput
• Collisions — Distant APs might not hear each other, leading to simultaneous transmissions that collide at clients
• Reduced data rates — Increased noise forces devices to lower rates for reliable communication

The 2.4 GHz Channel Problem:

The 2.4 GHz band provides only three non-overlapping channels (1, 6, 11 in North America). In dense deployments, there simply aren't enough channels to give each access point its own. This leads to intentional co-channel interference that must be carefully managed through power control and client steering.

Adjacent Channel Interference (ACI):

Even access points on different channels can interfere if their signals overlap in frequency or are simply very strong. In the 2.4 GHz band, using channels 1, 4, and 8 (for example) creates adjacent channel interference that's actually worse than just accepting co-channel interference on channels 1, 6, and 11.

The broadcast nature of radio communication creates inherent security challenges that don't exist in wired networks. Every frame transmitted over WiFi can potentially be captured by any receiver within range—including attackers. This fundamental characteristic demands that security be engineered into wireless networks from the ground up.

The Eavesdropping Reality:

Unlike wired networks where physical access is required to tap communications, wireless signals propagate beyond the intended coverage area. An attacker can:

• Capture traffic from a parking lot — Directional antennas extend reception range far beyond a building's walls
• Record now, decrypt later — Even encrypted traffic can be stored for future cryptanalysis
• Remain completely passive — Unlike physical taps, radio reception leaves no evidence

Attack Surfaces Unique to Wireless:

Management Frame Vulnerability:

Historically, 802.11 management frames (beacons, probe responses, authentication, association) were transmitted unencrypted and unauthenticated. This allowed trivial spoofing of deauthentication frames to disconnect any client. 802.11w (Protected Management Frames), now mandatory in WPA3, addresses this by cryptographically protecting management frames, but adoption remains incomplete.

Physical Layer Vulnerabilities:

Even below the MAC layer, wireless networks exhibit characteristics that aid attackers:

• Radio fingerprinting — Each transmitter has unique radio characteristics that can identify specific devices even when using MAC randomization
• Timing analysis — Precise timing of transmissions can leak information about network activity
• Signal strength mapping — RF surveys can map network coverage and identify access points even without associating

Perhaps the most compelling characteristic of WLANs is mobility—the ability to maintain network connectivity while physically moving. This wasn't possible with wired networks and fundamentally changes how humans interact with technology. However, seamless mobility requires careful engineering to overcome the inherent discontinuities of wireless communication.

The Roaming Challenge:

As a user moves through a building, they move away from one access point and closer to another. At some point, the client device must switch its association from the old AP to the new one. This process—roaming—must happen quickly enough that applications don't notice.

Roaming Stages:

1. Discovery — The client must identify candidate APs to roam to. This can be passive (listen for beacons) or active (send probe requests). Discovery can take 100-500ms if done naively.

2. Authentication — The client must authenticate with the new AP. With WPA2-Enterprise, this might involve full 802.1X/EAP exchange taking 500ms or more.

3. Association — The client formally associates with the new AP and negotiates capabilities.

4. Key Establishment — For encrypted networks, fresh keys must be established (4-way handshake).

5. IP Continuity — If the new AP is in a different subnet, the client may need a new IP address, breaking existing connections.

Client Roaming Decision:

Interestingly, the decision to roam rests entirely with the client device, not the network. This creates challenges:

• Sticky clients — Some devices remain connected to distant APs despite better alternatives nearby
• Overaggressive roaming — Other devices roam too frequently, causing unnecessary disruption
• Vendor-specific behavior — Each device manufacturer implements their own roaming algorithms with different thresholds and behaviors

802.11v allows the network to suggest that a client roam (BSS Transition Management), but the client can ignore this suggestion. True network-controlled roaming remains elusive.

Layer 3 Mobility:

Roaming between APs in the same subnet is relatively straightforward—the client keeps its IP address and only the Layer 2 connection changes. But roaming between subnets requires obtaining a new IP address, breaking all existing connections. Solutions like:

• VLAN pooling (extend the same VLAN to multiple APs)
• Controller-based architectures (traffic tunnels back to original subnet)
• Mobile IP protocols (complex, rarely deployed)

...address this problem with varying tradeoffs.

We've explored the fundamental characteristics that define Wireless LANs and distinguish them from their wired counterparts. These aren't merely interesting facts—they're the foundation upon which all wireless network design decisions rest.

What's Next:

With a solid understanding of WLAN characteristics, we're prepared to explore how these principles are codified in the IEEE 802.11 standard family. The next page covers the evolution of WiFi standards from 802.11-1997 through the latest WiFi 6E (802.11ax), examining how each generation addressed the challenges we've discussed while unlocking new capabilities.