Loading content...
When an engineer specifies optical fiber for a network installation, the first and most consequential decision is the fundamental architecture: single-mode or multi-mode. This choice cascades through every subsequent design decision—equipment selection, power budgets, distance capabilities, upgrade paths, and total cost of ownership.
These aren't merely different 'grades' of the same technology. Single-mode and multi-mode fibers represent fundamentally different approaches to light propagation, each optimized for distinct operating regimes. Understanding their differences—not just superficially, but at the level of physics and engineering tradeoffs—is essential for any network professional.
This page provides comprehensive coverage of both fiber types: their construction, propagation characteristics, performance capabilities, and the decision frameworks for selecting between them.
By the end of this page, you will understand the physical and electromagnetic differences between single-mode and multi-mode fibers, the various generations and classifications within each category (OM1-OM5, OS1/OS2), performance characteristics including bandwidth-distance products, and how to select the appropriate fiber type for specific applications.
The defining characteristic that separates single-mode from multi-mode fiber is precisely what the names suggest: the number of propagation modes supported.
Recall from the previous page that light in an optical fiber propagates as specific electromagnetic field patterns called modes. The V-number determines how many modes can exist:
V = (π × d × NA) / λ
The Engineering Consequence:
Since V depends on core diameter, numerical aperture, and wavelength, achieving single-mode operation requires a small core. Multi-mode fibers use larger cores that support hundreds or thousands of modes.
This seemingly simple distinction creates vastly different transmission characteristics:
| Characteristic | Single-mode (SMF) | Multi-mode (MMF) |
|---|---|---|
| Core diameter | 8-10 µm | 50 or 62.5 µm |
| Cladding diameter | 125 µm | 125 µm |
| Number of modes | 1 (LP₀₁) | Hundreds to thousands |
| Numerical aperture | 0.12-0.14 | 0.20-0.275 |
| Dominant dispersion | Chromatic, PMD | Modal, chromatic |
| Typical attenuation (1550 nm) | 0.20 dB/km | N/A (not used at 1550) |
| Typical attenuation (850 nm) | N/A | 2.5 dB/km |
| Maximum reach | 100+ km | 0.3-2 km |
| Light source | Laser (DFB, ECL) | VCSEL, LED |
| Connector alignment | Very critical | Less critical |
| Equipment cost | Higher | Lower |
| Primary application | Telecom, metro, long-haul | Data centers, enterprise LAN |
Note that both single-mode and multi-mode fibers have a standardized 125 µm cladding diameter. This enables the use of common connector ferrules, fusion splicers, and cable designs across fiber types. The difference is entirely in the core—invisible from the outside, but with profound operational implications.
Single-mode fiber (SMF) represents the highest-performance solution for optical transmission. By supporting only the fundamental mode, it eliminates modal dispersion entirely, enabling extreme bandwidth × distance products measured in terabits per second × kilometers.
Physical Construction:
The SMF core must be small enough that V < 2.405 at operating wavelengths. For 1550 nm operation with NA ≈ 0.13:
d < (2.405 × λ) / (π × NA)
d < (2.405 × 1.55 × 10⁻⁶) / (π × 0.13)
d < 9.1 µm
Standard single-mode fiber cores are 8-10 µm in diameter—roughly 1/8 the width of a human hair. This extreme precision demands sophisticated manufacturing and careful handling.
Refractive Index Profile:
Unlike the simple step-index profile of basic multi-mode fibers, single-mode fibers often employ matched cladding or depressed cladding designs:
Depressed cladding designs improve bend performance and are the basis for modern bend-insensitive fibers (G.657).
| Standard | Name | Zero Dispersion | Key Properties | Primary Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G.652.A/B | Standard SMF | ~1310 nm | Original standard; high dispersion at 1550 nm | Legacy networks |
| G.652.C/D | Low-water-peak SMF | ~1310 nm | Reduced OH⁻ absorption; enables full E-band | Modern telecom |
| G.653 | Dispersion-shifted | ~1550 nm | Zero dispersion at 1550 nm; FWM issues | Obsolete for DWDM |
| G.654 | Cut-off shifted | ~1310 nm | Lowest attenuation; larger mode field | Submarine cables |
| G.655 | NZDSF | 1530-1560 nm | Low non-zero dispersion; averts FWM | Long-haul DWDM |
| G.657.A1 | Bend-insensitive | ~1310 nm | 7.5 mm bend radius; G.652.D compatible | FTTH, indoor |
| G.657.A2/B2 | Enhanced bend | ~1310 nm | 5 mm bend radius; small penalties | FTTH, tight spaces |
| G.657.B3 | Extreme bend | ~1310 nm | 5 mm radius; maximum flexibility | Specialty applications |
For most new deployments, G.652.D fiber has become the de facto standard. It combines low water peak (eliminating the 1383 nm OH⁻ absorption spike), adequate bend tolerance, and full backward compatibility with existing equipment. Unless you need extreme bend tolerance (G.657) or submarine-grade performance (G.654), G.652.D is usually the right choice.
Mode Field Diameter:
In single-mode fiber, the light doesn't remain perfectly confined to the core—the electromagnetic field extends into the cladding as an evanescent wave. The Mode Field Diameter (MFD) describes the effective extent of this light distribution.
Typical MFD values:
MFD increases at longer wavelengths because more light extends into the cladding. This has practical implications:
Cut-off Wavelength:
Below a certain wavelength, the fiber becomes multi-mode—the V-number exceeds 2.405. The cut-off wavelength (λc) is the shortest wavelength at which single-mode operation is guaranteed.
For G.652 fiber: λc < 1260 nm (cable cut-off)
This ensures single-mode operation across the entire 1260-1625 nm operating range.
Multi-mode fiber (MMF) takes the opposite approach: a larger core that supports many propagation modes simultaneously. This creates fundamental tradeoffs—easier light coupling and lower equipment costs, but reduced reach due to modal dispersion.
Physical Construction:
Multi-mode fiber cores are either:
The larger core provides:
The Modal Dispersion Problem:
With hundreds of modes propagating simultaneously, each travels a slightly different path. Higher-order modes reflect at steeper angles, traveling longer paths than lower-order modes that travel nearly straight through the core.
For a 1 km step-index multi-mode fiber:
Modal dispersion ≈ (n₁ - n₂) / c × L
≈ (1.48 - 1.46) / (3×10⁸) × 1000
≈ 67 ns/km
This 67 ns pulse spread over 1 km would destroy any signal at rates above ~15 Mbps—utterly impractical for modern networking.
The solution is the graded-index profile: instead of a sharp step between core and cladding refractive indices, the refractive index decreases gradually from the center outward following a parabolic profile. Higher-order modes travel through regions of lower refractive index (faster) while lower-order modes travel through higher refractive index (slower). The path length advantage of lower-order modes is compensated by their slower speed, causing all modes to arrive at nearly the same time.
Graded-Index Profile:
The ideal graded-index profile follows a power law:
n(r) = n₁ × √(1 - 2Δ(r/a)^α)
where:
When α ≈ 2 (parabolic profile), modal dispersion is minimized. Manufacturing precision matters enormously—deviations from the optimal profile increase dispersion.
Modern laser-optimized multi-mode fibers are manufactured with α values precisely tuned for VCSEL sources, achieving modal bandwidths of 3500-4700 MHz·km at 850 nm.
| Category | Core/Clad | Bandwidth (850 nm) | Bandwidth (1310 nm) | Primary Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OM1 | 62.5/125 µm | 200 MHz·km | 500 MHz·km | Legacy Ethernet (10/100 Mbps) |
| OM2 | 50/125 µm | 500 MHz·km | 500 MHz·km | 1 Gigabit Ethernet |
| OM3 | 50/125 µm | 2000 MHz·km | 500 MHz·km | 10 GbE (300m), 40/100 GbE |
| OM4 | 50/125 µm | 4700 MHz·km | 500 MHz·km | 10 GbE (400m+), 40/100 GbE |
| OM5 | 50/125 µm | 4700 MHz·km + SWDM | 500 MHz·km | 25/50/100 GbE SWDM |
Effective Modal Bandwidth (EMB):
Traditional bandwidth measurements (overfilled launch, OFL) don't accurately characterize laser-optimized fiber performance. The Effective Modal Bandwidth (EMB) uses a laser source that replicates actual VCSEL launch conditions.
OM3/OM4 specifications include both OFL bandwidth and EMB:
Differential Mode Delay (DMD):
To verify graded-index quality, manufacturers measure Differential Mode Delay (DMD)—the arrival time differences between modes excited at different radial positions. A well-optimized fiber shows minimal DMD variation across the core, indicating that all modes travel at similar group velocities.
Mixing different OM categories in a single link creates severe problems. The mode field diameter, numerical aperture, and bandwidth characteristics differ between types. A link combining OM2 and OM4 segments will be limited by the worst section and may experience unexpected losses at the transition. Always use consistent fiber grades throughout a link.
The practical differences between single-mode and multi-mode fiber become starkly apparent when examining achievable distances at various data rates.
Multi-mode Fiber Reach:
Multi-mode reach is limited primarily by modal dispersion, which causes pulse spreading proportional to fiber length. The bandwidth × distance product is essentially constant for a given fiber grade.
| Application | Wavelength | OM1 | OM2 | OM3 | OM4 | OM5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100BASE-SX | 850 nm | 300m | 300m | 300m | 300m | 300m |
| 1000BASE-SX | 850 nm | 275m | 550m | 550m | 550m | 550m |
| 10GBASE-SR | 850 nm | 33m | 82m | 300m | 400m | 400m |
| 25GBASE-SR | 850 nm | N/A | N/A | 70m | 100m | 100m |
| 40GBASE-SR4 | 850 nm | N/A | N/A | 100m | 150m | 150m |
| 100GBASE-SR4 | 850 nm | N/A | N/A | 70m | 100m | 100m |
| 100GBASE-SR2 (SWDM) | 850-940 nm | N/A | N/A | N/A | 70m | 100m |
| 200GBASE-SR4 | 850 nm | N/A | N/A | 50m | 70m | 70m |
| 400GBASE-SR8 | 850 nm | N/A | N/A | 50m | 70m | 70m |
Single-mode Fiber Reach:
Single-mode fiber, unencumbered by modal dispersion, achieves vastly greater distances. The primary limitations become attenuation and chromatic dispersion, both of which can be addressed through amplification and dispersion compensation.
| Application | Wavelength | Reach (Typical) | Limiting Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1000BASE-LX | 1310 nm | 10 km | Power budget |
| 1000BASE-ZX | 1550 nm | 70 km | Power budget |
| 10GBASE-LR | 1310 nm | 10 km | Power budget |
| 10GBASE-ER | 1550 nm | 40 km | Power budget |
| 25GBASE-LR | 1310 nm | 10 km | Power budget |
| 40GBASE-LR4 | 1310 nm (CWDM) | 10 km | Power budget |
| 100GBASE-LR4 | 1310 nm (CWDM) | 10 km | Power budget |
| 100GBASE-ER4 | 1550 nm (CWDM) | 40 km | Dispersion + power |
| 100GBASE-ZR (coherent) | 1550 nm | 80+ km | OSNR |
| 400GBASE-ZR (coherent) | 1550 nm | 120+ km | OSNR |
For data center applications where 85% of links are under 100m and 99% are under 300m, OM4 multi-mode fiber with VCSEL-based transceivers offers the optimal cost-performance balance. Single-mode is reserved for inter-building connections or future-proofing strategies. This has made 10GBASE-SR and 25GBASE-SR the workhorses of modern data center networking.
The choice between single-mode and multi-mode involves significant cost trade-offs that vary depending on the application scale, distance requirements, and time horizon.
Fiber Cost:
Contrary to common assumption, single-mode fiber itself is often cheaper than multi-mode fiber. The precision graded-index profile required for laser-optimized multi-mode fiber is more difficult to manufacture than the simpler step-index profile of single-mode fiber.
Typical cable costs (per meter, installed):
However, fiber cost is typically a small fraction of total link cost. The dominant factors are transceivers and installation labor.
Transceiver Cost Comparison (approximate, 2024):
| Speed | Multi-mode (SR) | Single-mode (LR) | Cost Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 GbE SFP | $15-30 | $25-50 | 0.6x |
| 10 GbE SFP+ | $20-40 | $50-80 | 0.4x |
| 25 GbE SFP28 | $30-60 | $60-100 | 0.5x |
| 100 GbE QSFP28 | $100-200 | $250-400 | 0.4x |
| 400 GbE QSFP-DD | $500-800 | $1500-2500 | 0.35x |
For short links (<100m), multi-mode's lower transceiver cost dominates, making it the economical choice. For longer links or when future-proofing matters, single-mode's unlimited bandwidth potential reduces long-term costs. Many hyperscale data centers are now deploying single-mode even for short links, betting that coherent optics and wavelength multiplexing will dramatically reduce per-gigabit costs.
The choice of light source is intimately connected to fiber type. Multi-mode systems predominantly use VCSELs (Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers), while single-mode systems require edge-emitting lasers (DFB, FP, or external cavity designs).
VCSEL Technology:
VCSELs emit light perpendicular to the semiconductor surface, from a small circular aperture. Key characteristics:
Limitations:
Edge-Emitting Lasers:
Fabry-Pérot (FP) Lasers:
Distributed Feedback (DFB) Lasers:
External Cavity Lasers (ECL):
| Property | VCSEL | FP Laser | DFB Laser |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wavelength | 850 nm, 940 nm | 1310 nm, 1550 nm | 1310 nm, 1550 nm (precise) |
| Spectral width | ~0.6 nm | 2-10 nm | <0.1 nm |
| Output power | 1-10 mW | 1-20 mW | 1-100 mW |
| Modulation speed | Up to 28 Gbps | Up to 10 Gbps | Up to 50+ Gbps (directly) |
| Fiber coupling | Multi-mode | Single-mode | Single-mode |
| Cost | < $5 | $10-50 | $50-500 |
| Power consumption | Low | Medium | High |
| Application | Data center MMF | Short SMF | Long-haul, DWDM |
Using a VCSEL with single-mode fiber causes severe modal noise and unpredictable behavior—the broad VCSEL spectrum excites unstable mode combinations. Conversely, using a DFB laser with multi-mode fiber may work but wastes the laser's advantages (narrow spectrum) while dealing with multi-mode limitations (modal dispersion). Always match the light source to the intended fiber type.
OM5 represents the latest evolution in multi-mode fiber, specifically designed to support Short Wavelength Division Multiplexing (SWDM)—a technique that uses multiple wavelengths in the 850-950 nm range to multiply capacity over a single fiber.
The Challenge OM5 Addresses:
As data center bandwidth demands exceed what 850 nm VCSELs alone can provide, engineers explored higher lane counts (SR4, SR8 with multiple fiber pairs) and parallel optics. But more fibers mean more cables, more connectors, and higher installation costs.
SWDM offers an alternative: use 4 wavelengths (850, 880, 910, 940 nm) over a single fiber pair, achieving 4× capacity without additional fiber count.
The Technical Challenge:
Standard OM3/OM4 fibers are optimized for 850 nm. Their graded-index profiles produce higher modal dispersion at longer wavelengths (880-940 nm), drastically reducing bandwidth. OM5 fiber is manufactured with a wideband optimized profile that maintains high bandwidth across the entire 850-950 nm range.
| Wavelength | OM3 Bandwidth | OM4 Bandwidth | OM5 Bandwidth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 850 nm | 2000 MHz·km | 4700 MHz·km | 4700 MHz·km |
| 880 nm | ~1200 MHz·km | ~2800 MHz·km | 3600 MHz·km |
| 910 nm | ~800 MHz·km | ~1800 MHz·km | 2700 MHz·km |
| 940 nm | ~500 MHz·km | ~1200 MHz·km | 2000 MHz·km |
SWDM Applications:
OM5 Identification:
OM5 cables are jacketed in lime green (aqua for OM3/OM4) to prevent accidental mixing. All OM5 specifications meet or exceed OM4 at 850 nm, ensuring backward compatibility with existing SR equipment.
Is OM5 Worth It?
The value proposition depends on deployment scale:
Despite OM5's innovations, the data center industry increasingly favors single-mode fiber for new deployments. The argument: single-mode fiber costs less than OM4/OM5, offers unlimited bandwidth headroom, and coherent optics are rapidly decreasing in cost. Meta, Google, and Microsoft have all announced single-mode-focused strategies for new facilities.
Choosing between single-mode and multi-mode fiber requires evaluating multiple factors. Here's a structured decision framework based on real-world engineering practice.
| Application | Recommended Fiber | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise campus backbone | Single-mode (OS2) | Distances often >300m; long lifecycle |
| Data center spine-leaf | OM4 or Single-mode | Cost vs future-proofing trade-off |
| Top-of-rack to server | OM4 | Short distances; cost efficiency |
| Building-to-building | Single-mode (OS2) | Distance requirements |
| Telecom metro/access | Single-mode (various) | Distance + WDM requirements |
| FTTH (fiber-to-home) | Single-mode (G.657) | Distance + bend tolerance |
| Industrial/harsh environment | Single-mode (G.657.A2) | Bend tolerance, reliability |
| Hyperscale data center | Single-mode (OS2) | Future capacity, lower TCO |
Many organizations deploy both: multi-mode for current high-density, short-reach connections (server-to-leaf) and single-mode for longer runs and future-proof backbone infrastructure. This balanced approach optimizes near-term costs while preserving upgrade paths. The key is maintaining clear documentation and consistent fiber types within each network tier.
We've comprehensively examined the two fundamental optical fiber architectures—each with distinct physics, performance characteristics, and optimal application domains.
What's Next:
With fiber types understood, the next page examines the connectors that terminate optical fibers—the mechanical interfaces that enable reliable light coupling between fibers, transceivers, and patch panels. We'll cover SC, LC, MTP/MPO, and other connector types, along with their specifications and applications.
You now understand the physical and performance differences between single-mode and multi-mode optical fibers, their respective standards and classifications, and the engineering factors that guide selection between them. This knowledge is essential for designing, specifying, and troubleshooting modern optical networks.