Loading content...
You are given a wooden rod of length rodLength units. The rod is conceptually marked from position 0 to position rodLength, representing a continuous segment that can be divided at any integer position along its length.
You are also provided with an integer array divisionPoints, where each divisionPoints[i] represents a specific position where you must make a cut to divide the rod. All positions in the array are unique and fall strictly within the range (0, rodLength).
The Division Process:
p, the original segment splits into two smaller segments.Your Objective: Determine the minimum total cost required to complete all divisions at the specified positions. Since the order of divisions affects the cumulative cost, you must find the optimal sequence that minimizes the sum of all individual division costs.
Understanding the Cost Mechanics: Consider a rod of length 7 with division points [1, 3, 4, 5]:
The key insight is that dividing at the middle of remaining segments tends to produce smaller sub-segments earlier, reducing subsequent costs. Your task is to find this optimal ordering efficiently.
rodLength = 7
divisionPoints = [1, 3, 4, 5]16Dividing at positions [3, 5, 1, 4] yields the minimum total cost. First, divide the rod of length 7 at position 3 (cost = 7), creating segments [0-3] and [3-7]. Next, divide segment [3-7] at position 5 (cost = 4). Then divide segment [0-3] at position 1 (cost = 3). Finally, divide segment [3-5] at position 4 (cost = 2). Total cost = 7 + 4 + 3 + 2 = 16.
rodLength = 9
divisionPoints = [5, 6, 1, 4, 2]22With 5 division points, the naive left-to-right order [1, 2, 4, 5, 6] would cost 25. An optimal ordering such as [4, 6, 5, 2, 1] or similar produces the minimum cost of 22. The algorithm must consider all possible orderings to find this optimal result.
rodLength = 10
divisionPoints = [3, 7]17With only two division points, there are two possible orderings: dividing at 3 first, then at 7, or vice versa. Dividing at 3 first costs 10 (full rod) + 7 (segment 3-10) = 17. Dividing at 7 first costs 10 + 7 (segment 0-7) = 17. Both orderings yield the same minimum cost of 17.
Constraints