Use Cases — Write-Through Caching | OneNoughtOne

0/121

System Design (HLD)Write-Through Caching

Write-Through Caching

LevelIntermediate

Duration90 mins

TopicWrite-Through Caching

5 / 5

Use Cases

Choosing the Right Tool for the Job

Throughout this module, we've examined write-through caching from every angle—its mechanics, consistency guarantees, and performance trade-offs. Now comes the crucial question: When should you actually use it? Write-through caching is not a universal solution. It excels in specific scenarios and fails spectacularly in others. The mark of an expert engineer is knowing not just how to use a tool, but when to reach for it. This page provides a comprehensive catalog of use cases—both where write-through shines and where you should choose alternatives. You'll find decision frameworks, real-world examples, and implementation guidance for each scenario.

What You Will Learn

By the end of this page, you will be able to confidently identify when write-through caching is the optimal choice, understand the specific characteristics that make a use case suitable, and know how to adapt the pattern for different domains and requirements.

Ideal Use Case Characteristics

Before diving into specific scenarios, let's establish the characteristics that make a use case well-suited for write-through caching.

Suitability Indicators for Write-Through Caching
Characteristic	Ideal for Write-Through	Poor Fit for Write-Through
Read-to-Write Ratio	High (>10:1)	Low (<5:1)
Consistency Requirement	Strong, immediate	Eventual is acceptable
Data Criticality	High (financial, security)	Low (analytics, logs)
Write Latency Tolerance	50-100ms acceptable	Must be <10ms
Write Throughput Needs	Moderate (<10K/sec)	Very high (>100K/sec)
Data Durability	Zero loss tolerance	Some loss acceptable
Cache Hit Rate	High (>80%)	Low or unpredictable

The Decision Matrix: Use this scoring system to evaluate whether write-through is appropriate: Score each dimension 0-2: 0 = Poor fit for write-through 1 = Neutral 2 = Excellent fit for write-through Dimensions: □ Read-to-write ratio > 10:1 (0-2) □ Data must be immediately consistent (0-2) □ Data is critical (financial, security) (0-2) □ Write latency of 50ms is acceptable (0-2) □ Write throughput < 10K/sec (0-2) Total Score: 8-10: Write-through is strongly recommended 5-7: Write-through is viable, consider alternatives 0-4: Write-through is not recommended

The Golden Rule

Write-through caching is optimal when data consistency is more valuable than write performance. If your users or business logic require immediate visibility of changes, and your write volume is manageable, write-through is likely the right choice.

Use Case: Financial Services

Financial systems are the canonical use case for write-through caching. The cost of showing incorrect data—even briefly—can be measured in legal liability, regulatory fines, and lost customer trust.

Scenario: Account Balance Management A retail banking application displays account balances to customers and processes transactions. Requirements: Customers must see accurate balances immediately after transactions No overdrafts should be allowed due to stale cache data Audit requirements mandate accurate historical records Read-to-write ratio: ~50:1 (many balance checks, fewer transactions) Why Write-Through Excels: Immediate consistency prevents showing a $5,000 balance when the account has $50 Database-first writes ensure durability for audit trails High read ratio means cache provides massive read performance benefits 50ms write latency is invisible to users pressing "Transfer" buttons

banking_write_through.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
class AccountService {
  async processTransaction(
    accountId: string,
    amount: number,
    type: 'credit' | 'debit'
  ): Promise<TransactionResult> {
    // Use database transaction for atomicity
    const result = await this.db.transaction(async (tx) => {
      // Lock the account row to prevent concurrent modifications
      const account = await tx.account.findUnique({
        where: { id: accountId },
        lock: true,  // FOR UPDATE
      });
 
      if (!account) {
        throw new AccountNotFoundError(accountId);
      }
 
      // Validate sufficient funds for debit
      const newBalance = type === 'credit' 
        ? account.balance + amount 
        : account.balance - amount;
 
      if (newBalance < 0 && !account.overdraftProtection) {
        throw new InsufficientFundsError(accountId, account.balance, amount);
      }
 
      // Update balance
      const updatedAccount = await tx.account.update({
        where: { id: accountId },
        data: { 
          balance: newBalance,
          lastTransactionAt: new Date(),
        },
      });
 
      // Create transaction record
      const transaction = await tx.transaction.create({
        data: {
          accountId,
          amount,
          type,
          balanceAfter: newBalance,
          timestamp: new Date(),
        },
      });
 
      return { account: updatedAccount, transaction };
    });
 
    // Write-through: Update cache after DB success
    await this.updateAccountCache(result.account);
 
    return {
      success: true,
      transactionId: result.transaction.id,
      newBalance: result.account.balance,
    };
  }
 
  private async updateAccountCache(account: Account): Promise<void> {
    const cacheKey = `account:${account.id}`;
    
    // Store versioned data for consistency verification
    const cacheData = {
      ...account,
      cachedAt: Date.now(),
      version: account.updatedAt.getTime(),
    };
 
    await this.cache.set(cacheKey, cacheData, { ttl: 3600 });
  }
 
  async getBalance(accountId: string): Promise<number> {
    const cacheKey = `account:${accountId}`;
    
    // Try cache first
    const cached = await this.cache.get<CachedAccount>(cacheKey);
    if (cached) {
      this.metrics.increment('balance_cache_hits');
      return cached.balance;
    }
 
    // Cache miss: load from database
    this.metrics.increment('balance_cache_misses');
    const account = await this.db.account.findUnique({
      where: { id: accountId },
    });
 
    if (!account) {
      throw new AccountNotFoundError(accountId);
    }
 
    // Populate cache for future reads
    await this.updateAccountCache(account);
    
    return account.balance;
  }
}

Other Financial Use Cases: Portfolio Valuations — Investment portfolios must reflect current holdings after trades Credit Limits — Credit card available credit must be accurate to prevent over-limit transactions Trading Order Books — Order status must be immediately visible to traders Payment Processing — Payment status changes must be immediately consistent across systems Fraud Scores — Updated risk scores must be immediately visible for transaction decisions

Use Case: E-Commerce

E-commerce platforms have a mix of write-through and alternative caching needs. The key is identifying which data requires strong consistency.

Use Write-Through For

•Inventory counts — Prevent overselling
•Cart contents — Users expect immediate updates
•Order status — Critical for customer experience
•Price changes — Must be consistent across views
•Customer profile — Address changes, payment methods

Use Alternative For

•Product catalog — Updates can be eventually consistent
•Reviews/ratings — Slight delay acceptable
•Search indexes — Async updates via queues
•Recommendations — Precomputed, batch-updated
•Analytics/clickstream — High volume, no consistency needs

Scenario: Shopping Cart + Inventory A customer adds an item to their cart. The system must: Update the cart (write-through for immediate visibility) Reserve inventory (write-through to prevent overselling) Handle concurrent purchases of the same item Implementation Approach:

cart_inventory.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
class CartService {
  async addToCart(
    userId: string,
    productId: string,
    quantity: number
  ): Promise<CartUpdateResult> {
    // Step 1: Check and reserve inventory
    const inventory = await this.inventoryService.reserve(productId, quantity);
    
    if (!inventory.success) {
      return {
        success: false,
        error: 'INSUFFICIENT_INVENTORY',
        available: inventory.available,
      };
    }
 
    try {
      // Step 2: Update cart in database
      const cart = await this.db.cartItem.upsert({
        where: { 
          userId_productId: { userId, productId } 
        },
        create: {
          userId,
          productId,
          quantity,
          reservationId: inventory.reservationId,
        },
        update: {
          quantity: { increment: quantity },
          reservationId: inventory.reservationId,
        },
      });
 
      // Step 3: Write-through to cache
      await this.syncCartCache(userId);
 
      return {
        success: true,
        cart: await this.getCart(userId),
        reservationId: inventory.reservationId,
      };
 
    } catch (error) {
      // Rollback inventory reservation on cart failure
      await this.inventoryService.releaseReservation(inventory.reservationId);
      throw error;
    }
  }
 
  private async syncCartCache(userId: string): Promise<void> {
    const cart = await this.db.cartItem.findMany({
      where: { userId },
      include: { product: true },
    });
 
    const cacheKey = `cart:${userId}`;
    const cacheData = {
      items: cart,
      itemCount: cart.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.quantity, 0),
      subtotal: cart.reduce(
        (sum, item) => sum + item.quantity * item.product.price, 
        0
      ),
      updatedAt: Date.now(),
    };
 
    await this.cache.set(cacheKey, cacheData, { ttl: 3600 });
  }
}
 
class InventoryService {
  async reserve(
    productId: string,
    quantity: number
  ): Promise<ReservationResult> {
    // Use database transaction with row locking
    return this.db.transaction(async (tx) => {
      const inventory = await tx.inventory.findUnique({
        where: { productId },
        lock: true,
      });
 
      if (!inventory || inventory.available < quantity) {
        return {
          success: false,
          available: inventory?.available ?? 0,
        };
      }
 
      // Decrement available inventory
      const updated = await tx.inventory.update({
        where: { productId },
        data: {
          available: { decrement: quantity },
          reserved: { increment: quantity },
        },
      });
 
      // Create reservation record for tracking
      const reservation = await tx.inventoryReservation.create({
        data: {
          productId,
          quantity,
          expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + 15 * 60 * 1000), // 15 min hold
        },
      });
 
      // Write-through: Update inventory cache
      await this.syncInventoryCache(productId, updated);
 
      return {
        success: true,
        reservationId: reservation.id,
        available: updated.available,
      };
    });
  }
 
  private async syncInventoryCache(
    productId: string, 
    inventory: Inventory
  ): Promise<void> {
    const cacheKey = `inventory:${productId}`;
    await this.cache.set(cacheKey, {
      available: inventory.available,
      reserved: inventory.reserved,
      updatedAt: Date.now(),
    }, { ttl: 300 }); // 5 minute TTL
  }
}

Flash Sales and High Concurrency

For flash sales or high-demand items, write-through alone isn't enough. You need distributed locks or optimistic concurrency control at the database level to prevent race conditions. Write-through ensures the cache reflects the truth; it doesn't prevent concurrent database conflicts.

Use Case: Session and Security

User sessions and security-related data are prime candidates for write-through caching. Security changes must propagate immediately to prevent vulnerabilities.

Scenario: Session Invalidation on Password Change When a user changes their password, all existing sessions must be immediately invalidated to prevent unauthorized access from potentially compromised sessions. The Problem with Eventual Consistency: 1. Attacker compromises user password 2. User notices and changes password 3. System updates password in database 4. Cache still has old session tokens (eventual consistency) 5. Attacker can continue using old sessions until cache expires 6. Security vulnerability window: minutes to hours With Write-Through: 1. User changes password 2. System updates password in database 3. System invalidates all sessions in database 4. Write-through: Session invalidation stored in cache immediately 5. Attacker's session is rejected on next request 6. Security vulnerability window: milliseconds

session_security.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
class SecurityService {
  async changePassword(
    userId: string,
    currentPassword: string,
    newPassword: string
  ): Promise<PasswordChangeResult> {
    // Verify current password
    const user = await this.verifyCurrentPassword(userId, currentPassword);
    if (!user) {
      return { success: false, error: 'INVALID_CURRENT_PASSWORD' };
    }
 
    // Transaction: Update password and invalidate sessions
    await this.db.transaction(async (tx) => {
      // Update password
      await tx.user.update({
        where: { id: userId },
        data: {
          passwordHash: await this.hashPassword(newPassword),
          passwordChangedAt: new Date(),
        },
      });
 
      // Record password change for audit
      await tx.securityAudit.create({
        data: {
          userId,
          action: 'PASSWORD_CHANGE',
          timestamp: new Date(),
          ip: this.getClientIp(),
        },
      });
    });
 
    // Write-through: Invalidate all sessions immediately
    await this.invalidateAllSessions(userId);
 
    // Write-through: Update user cache
    await this.syncUserCache(userId);
 
    return { 
      success: true, 
      message: 'Password changed. All sessions have been logged out.',
    };
  }
 
  private async invalidateAllSessions(userId: string): Promise<void> {
    // Delete all sessions from database
    await this.db.session.deleteMany({
      where: { userId },
    });
 
    // Write-through: Update session invalidation marker in cache
    // This is checked on every authenticated request
    const invalidationKey = `session_invalidation:${userId}`;
    await this.cache.set(invalidationKey, {
      invalidatedAt: Date.now(),
      reason: 'PASSWORD_CHANGE',
    }, { ttl: 86400 }); // 24 hour TTL
 
    // Also delete individual session caches if they exist
    const sessionKeys = await this.cache.keys(`session:${userId}:*`);
    if (sessionKeys.length > 0) {
      await this.cache.del(...sessionKeys);
    }
  }
 
  // Called on every authenticated request
  async validateSession(sessionToken: string): Promise<SessionValidation> {
    // Check session in cache first
    const cachedSession = await this.cache.get<SessionData>(
      `session:${sessionToken}`
    );
 
    if (!cachedSession) {
      // Cache miss: validate against database
      return this.validateSessionFromDatabase(sessionToken);
    }
 
    // Check for session invalidation (write-through updated this immediately)
    const invalidation = await this.cache.get<InvalidationData>(
      `session_invalidation:${cachedSession.userId}`
    );
 
    if (invalidation && invalidation.invalidatedAt > cachedSession.createdAt) {
      // Session was created before invalidation
      return { valid: false, reason: 'SESSION_INVALIDATED' };
    }
 
    return { valid: true, session: cachedSession };
  }
}
 
class PermissionService {
  async revokePermission(
    userId: string,
    permission: string
  ): Promise<void> {
    // Database update
    await this.db.userPermission.delete({
      where: { userId_permission: { userId, permission } },
    });
 
    // Write-through: Update permission cache immediately
    // Critical for security - user should lose access instantly
    await this.syncPermissionCache(userId);
  }
 
  private async syncPermissionCache(userId: string): Promise<void> {
    const permissions = await this.db.userPermission.findMany({
      where: { userId },
    });
 
    const cacheKey = `permissions:${userId}`;
    await this.cache.set(cacheKey, {
      permissions: permissions.map(p => p.permission),
      updatedAt: Date.now(),
    }, { ttl: 300 });
  }
}

Other Security Use Cases: MFA Enrollment/Revocation — Changes must be effective immediately API Key Rotation — Old keys must stop working instantly Account Lockout — Failed login thresholds must be enforced immediately Role Changes — Privilege escalation/deescalation must be immediate IP Blacklisting — Blocked IPs must be rejected instantly

Use Case: Real-Time Display Systems

Systems that display real-time information to users often benefit from write-through caching, especially when the information is critical for decision-making.

Real-Time Display Use Cases
System	Critical Data	Why Write-Through	Alternative Approaches
Dashboards	KPIs, metrics	Executives need current data for decisions	Streaming for sub-second updates
Leaderboards	Scores, rankings	Players expect immediate updates	Event sourcing for high-volume gaming
Status Pages	Service health	Incident response depends on accuracy	Push-based for real-time
Inventory Displays	Stock levels	Store staff need accurate counts	None—write-through is ideal
Booking Systems	Availability	Prevent double-booking	Locking for high contention

Scenario: Restaurant Reservation System A restaurant booking platform shows available time slots. When a reservation is made, the slot must immediately show as unavailable to prevent double-booking.

reservation_system.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
class ReservationService {
  async makeReservation(
    restaurantId: string,
    date: Date,
    time: string,
    partySize: number,
    customerId: string
  ): Promise<ReservationResult> {
    const slotKey = `${restaurantId}:${date.toISOString().split('T')[0]}:${time}`;
 
    // Use distributed lock to prevent race conditions
    const lock = await this.locks.acquire(`reservation:${slotKey}`, 5000);
 
    try {
      // Check availability in database (source of truth)
      const availability = await this.db.availability.findUnique({
        where: { slotKey },
      });
 
      if (!availability || availability.remainingCapacity < partySize) {
        return {
          success: false,
          error: 'SLOT_UNAVAILABLE',
          remainingCapacity: availability?.remainingCapacity ?? 0,
        };
      }
 
      // Create reservation and update availability atomically
      const [reservation, updatedAvailability] = await this.db.transaction(
        async (tx) => {
          const reservation = await tx.reservation.create({
            data: {
              restaurantId,
              date,
              time,
              partySize,
              customerId,
              status: 'CONFIRMED',
              confirmationCode: this.generateConfirmationCode(),
            },
          });
 
          const updated = await tx.availability.update({
            where: { slotKey },
            data: {
              remainingCapacity: { decrement: partySize },
              reservationCount: { increment: 1 },
            },
          });
 
          return [reservation, updated];
        }
      );
 
      // Write-through: Update availability cache immediately
      await this.syncAvailabilityCache(slotKey, updatedAvailability);
 
      // Write-through: Update customer's reservations cache
      await this.syncCustomerReservationsCache(customerId);
 
      return {
        success: true,
        reservation,
        confirmationCode: reservation.confirmationCode,
      };
 
    } finally {
      await lock.release();
    }
  }
 
  async getAvailability(
    restaurantId: string,
    date: Date
  ): Promise<TimeSlot[]> {
    const cacheKey = `availability:${restaurantId}:${date.toISOString().split('T')[0]}`;
    
    // Check cache first
    const cached = await this.cache.get<TimeSlot[]>(cacheKey);
    if (cached) {
      return cached;
    }
 
    // Cache miss: load from database
    const slots = await this.db.availability.findMany({
      where: {
        restaurantId,
        date,
        remainingCapacity: { gt: 0 },
      },
    });
 
    // Cache for next request (but not too long - availability changes)
    await this.cache.set(cacheKey, slots, { ttl: 60 }); // 1 minute TTL
 
    return slots;
  }
 
  private async syncAvailabilityCache(
    slotKey: string,
    availability: Availability
  ): Promise<void> {
    // Update individual slot cache
    await this.cache.set(`slot:${slotKey}`, availability, { ttl: 300 });
 
    // Invalidate the date's availability list to force refresh
    const [restaurantId, date] = slotKey.split(':');
    await this.cache.del(`availability:${restaurantId}:${date}`);
  }
}

Anti-Patterns: When NOT to Use Write-Through

Equally important as knowing when to use write-through is knowing when to avoid it. Here are scenarios where write-through is the wrong choice.

Anti-Pattern 1: High-Volume Analytics/Logging The Scenario: Website tracking page views, clicks, and user behavior Thousands of events per second per server Data is written once and rarely read immediately Why Write-Through Fails: Write latency is unacceptable for event tracking (blocks page load) Write volume overwhelms the database Immediate consistency is unnecessary for analytics Better Alternative: Write-back with batching, or write directly to a time-series database/message queue.

Anti-Pattern 2: High-Frequency Counters The Scenario: View counts, like counts, impression counters Potentially millions of increments per minute Exact real-time accuracy not critical Why Write-Through Fails: Each increment requires a database round-trip Database becomes bottleneck instantly Counter value is often approximate anyway Better Alternative: Write-back with periodic flush, Redis atomic counters with periodic database sync, or HyperLogLog for approximate counting.

Anti-Pattern 3: Large Binary Data The Scenario: Uploading images, videos, documents Files are megabytes in size Stored in object storage (S3) with metadata in database Why Write-Through Fails: Caching large binary data is expensive (memory consumption) Network transfer of large payloads is slow Read patterns are often sequential, not random access Better Alternative: Store metadata with write-through, but serve binary data directly from object storage with CDN caching.

Anti-Pattern 4: Append-Only Logs/Audit Trails The Scenario: System audit logs, compliance records Write-once, read-rarely data Historical queries, not real-time lookups Why Write-Through Fails: Data is rarely read (low cache hit rate) High write volume strains cache as well as database Caching adds no value for archival data Better Alternative: Write-around (skip cache entirely), or write directly to append-only log storage.

The Red Flags

Avoid write-through when you see: (1) write-to-read ratio > 1:1, (2) data that's rarely accessed after writing, (3) approximate values being acceptable, (4) very high write throughput requirements (>100K/sec), or (5) large payloads (>1MB). Any of these is a signal to consider alternatives.

Implementation Decision Tree

Use this decision tree when evaluating whether to implement write-through caching for a specific data type or feature.

decision_tree.txt

Text

                   Start Here
                        │
                        ▼
        ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
        │   Does data need to be cached at    │
        │   all? (High read volume, slow DB)  │
        └─────────────────────────────────────┘
                        │
              ┌─────────┼─────────┐
              │ NO      │         │ YES
              ▼         │         ▼
        ┌──────────┐    │   ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
        │ No Cache │    │   │  Is immediate consistency required? │
        │ Needed   │    │   │  (Security, financial, user-facing) │
        └──────────┘    │   └─────────────────────────────────────┘
                        │                     │
                        │         ┌───────────┼───────────┐
                        │         │ NO        │           │ YES
                        │         ▼           │           ▼
                        │   ┌──────────────┐  │   ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
                        │   │ Cache-Aside  │  │   │  Is write latency of 50ms+ okay?    │
                        │   │ (Lazy Load)  │  │   │  (Not real-time, user can wait)     │
                        │   └──────────────┘  │   └─────────────────────────────────────┘
                        │                     │                     │
                        │                     │         ┌───────────┼───────────┐
                        │                     │         │ NO        │           │ YES
                        │                     │         ▼           │           ▼
                        │                     │   ┌──────────────┐  │   ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
                        │                     │   │ Write-Back   │  │   │  Is write volume manageable?        │
                        │                     │   │ (if data loss│  │   │  (<10K writes/sec)                  │
                        │                     │   │  acceptable) │  │   └─────────────────────────────────────┘
                        │                     │   └──────────────┘  │                     │
                        │                     │                     │         ┌───────────┼───────────┐
                        │                     │                     │         │ NO        │           │ YES
                        │                     │                     │         ▼           │           ▼
                        │                     │                     │   ┌──────────────┐  │   ┌──────────────┐
                        │                     │                     │   │ Shard DB +   │  │   │ WRITE-       │
                        │                     │                     │   │ Write-Through│  │   │ THROUGH      │
                        │                     │                     │   │ OR Evaluate  │  │   │ CACHING      │
                        │                     │                     │   │ Trade-offs   │  │   │ ✓            │
                        │                     │                     │   └──────────────┘  │   └──────────────┘
                        │                     │                     │                     │
                        └─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┘

Quick Reference Summary:

If you need...	Use...
Strong consistency + durability	Write-Through
Low write latency + some consistency	Write-Back
Simple implementation + read-heavy	Cache-Aside
Write-heavy + no immediate read	Write-Around
Proactive cache warming	Refresh-Ahead

System Design (HLD)Write-Through Caching

Write-Through Caching

LevelIntermediate

Duration90 mins

TopicWrite-Through Caching

5 / 5

Use Cases

Choosing the Right Tool for the Job

Throughout this module, we've examined write-through caching from every angle—its mechanics, consistency guarantees, and performance trade-offs. Now comes the crucial question: When should you actually use it? Write-through caching is not a universal solution. It excels in specific scenarios and fails spectacularly in others. The mark of an expert engineer is knowing not just how to use a tool, but when to reach for it. This page provides a comprehensive catalog of use cases—both where write-through shines and where you should choose alternatives. You'll find decision frameworks, real-world examples, and implementation guidance for each scenario.

What You Will Learn

By the end of this page, you will be able to confidently identify when write-through caching is the optimal choice, understand the specific characteristics that make a use case suitable, and know how to adapt the pattern for different domains and requirements.

Ideal Use Case Characteristics

Before diving into specific scenarios, let's establish the characteristics that make a use case well-suited for write-through caching.

Suitability Indicators for Write-Through Caching
Characteristic	Ideal for Write-Through	Poor Fit for Write-Through
Read-to-Write Ratio	High (>10:1)	Low (<5:1)
Consistency Requirement	Strong, immediate	Eventual is acceptable
Data Criticality	High (financial, security)	Low (analytics, logs)
Write Latency Tolerance	50-100ms acceptable	Must be <10ms
Write Throughput Needs	Moderate (<10K/sec)	Very high (>100K/sec)
Data Durability	Zero loss tolerance	Some loss acceptable
Cache Hit Rate	High (>80%)	Low or unpredictable

The Decision Matrix: Use this scoring system to evaluate whether write-through is appropriate: Score each dimension 0-2: 0 = Poor fit for write-through 1 = Neutral 2 = Excellent fit for write-through Dimensions: □ Read-to-write ratio > 10:1 (0-2) □ Data must be immediately consistent (0-2) □ Data is critical (financial, security) (0-2) □ Write latency of 50ms is acceptable (0-2) □ Write throughput < 10K/sec (0-2) Total Score: 8-10: Write-through is strongly recommended 5-7: Write-through is viable, consider alternatives 0-4: Write-through is not recommended

The Golden Rule

Write-through caching is optimal when data consistency is more valuable than write performance. If your users or business logic require immediate visibility of changes, and your write volume is manageable, write-through is likely the right choice.

Use Case: Financial Services

Financial systems are the canonical use case for write-through caching. The cost of showing incorrect data—even briefly—can be measured in legal liability, regulatory fines, and lost customer trust.

Scenario: Account Balance Management A retail banking application displays account balances to customers and processes transactions. Requirements: Customers must see accurate balances immediately after transactions No overdrafts should be allowed due to stale cache data Audit requirements mandate accurate historical records Read-to-write ratio: ~50:1 (many balance checks, fewer transactions) Why Write-Through Excels: Immediate consistency prevents showing a $5,000 balance when the account has $50 Database-first writes ensure durability for audit trails High read ratio means cache provides massive read performance benefits 50ms write latency is invisible to users pressing "Transfer" buttons

banking_write_through.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
class AccountService {
  async processTransaction(
    accountId: string,
    amount: number,
    type: 'credit' | 'debit'
  ): Promise<TransactionResult> {
    // Use database transaction for atomicity
    const result = await this.db.transaction(async (tx) => {
      // Lock the account row to prevent concurrent modifications
      const account = await tx.account.findUnique({
        where: { id: accountId },
        lock: true,  // FOR UPDATE
      });
 
      if (!account) {
        throw new AccountNotFoundError(accountId);
      }
 
      // Validate sufficient funds for debit
      const newBalance = type === 'credit' 
        ? account.balance + amount 
        : account.balance - amount;
 
      if (newBalance < 0 && !account.overdraftProtection) {
        throw new InsufficientFundsError(accountId, account.balance, amount);
      }
 
      // Update balance
      const updatedAccount = await tx.account.update({
        where: { id: accountId },
        data: { 
          balance: newBalance,
          lastTransactionAt: new Date(),
        },
      });
 
      // Create transaction record
      const transaction = await tx.transaction.create({
        data: {
          accountId,
          amount,
          type,
          balanceAfter: newBalance,
          timestamp: new Date(),
        },
      });
 
      return { account: updatedAccount, transaction };
    });
 
    // Write-through: Update cache after DB success
    await this.updateAccountCache(result.account);
 
    return {
      success: true,
      transactionId: result.transaction.id,
      newBalance: result.account.balance,
    };
  }
 
  private async updateAccountCache(account: Account): Promise<void> {
    const cacheKey = `account:${account.id}`;
    
    // Store versioned data for consistency verification
    const cacheData = {
      ...account,
      cachedAt: Date.now(),
      version: account.updatedAt.getTime(),
    };
 
    await this.cache.set(cacheKey, cacheData, { ttl: 3600 });
  }
 
  async getBalance(accountId: string): Promise<number> {
    const cacheKey = `account:${accountId}`;
    
    // Try cache first
    const cached = await this.cache.get<CachedAccount>(cacheKey);
    if (cached) {
      this.metrics.increment('balance_cache_hits');
      return cached.balance;
    }
 
    // Cache miss: load from database
    this.metrics.increment('balance_cache_misses');
    const account = await this.db.account.findUnique({
      where: { id: accountId },
    });
 
    if (!account) {
      throw new AccountNotFoundError(accountId);
    }
 
    // Populate cache for future reads
    await this.updateAccountCache(account);
    
    return account.balance;
  }
}

Other Financial Use Cases: Portfolio Valuations — Investment portfolios must reflect current holdings after trades Credit Limits — Credit card available credit must be accurate to prevent over-limit transactions Trading Order Books — Order status must be immediately visible to traders Payment Processing — Payment status changes must be immediately consistent across systems Fraud Scores — Updated risk scores must be immediately visible for transaction decisions

Use Case: E-Commerce

E-commerce platforms have a mix of write-through and alternative caching needs. The key is identifying which data requires strong consistency.

Use Write-Through For

•Inventory counts — Prevent overselling
•Cart contents — Users expect immediate updates
•Order status — Critical for customer experience
•Price changes — Must be consistent across views
•Customer profile — Address changes, payment methods

Use Alternative For

•Product catalog — Updates can be eventually consistent
•Reviews/ratings — Slight delay acceptable
•Search indexes — Async updates via queues
•Recommendations — Precomputed, batch-updated
•Analytics/clickstream — High volume, no consistency needs

Scenario: Shopping Cart + Inventory A customer adds an item to their cart. The system must: Update the cart (write-through for immediate visibility) Reserve inventory (write-through to prevent overselling) Handle concurrent purchases of the same item Implementation Approach:

cart_inventory.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
class CartService {
  async addToCart(
    userId: string,
    productId: string,
    quantity: number
  ): Promise<CartUpdateResult> {
    // Step 1: Check and reserve inventory
    const inventory = await this.inventoryService.reserve(productId, quantity);
    
    if (!inventory.success) {
      return {
        success: false,
        error: 'INSUFFICIENT_INVENTORY',
        available: inventory.available,
      };
    }
 
    try {
      // Step 2: Update cart in database
      const cart = await this.db.cartItem.upsert({
        where: { 
          userId_productId: { userId, productId } 
        },
        create: {
          userId,
          productId,
          quantity,
          reservationId: inventory.reservationId,
        },
        update: {
          quantity: { increment: quantity },
          reservationId: inventory.reservationId,
        },
      });
 
      // Step 3: Write-through to cache
      await this.syncCartCache(userId);
 
      return {
        success: true,
        cart: await this.getCart(userId),
        reservationId: inventory.reservationId,
      };
 
    } catch (error) {
      // Rollback inventory reservation on cart failure
      await this.inventoryService.releaseReservation(inventory.reservationId);
      throw error;
    }
  }
 
  private async syncCartCache(userId: string): Promise<void> {
    const cart = await this.db.cartItem.findMany({
      where: { userId },
      include: { product: true },
    });
 
    const cacheKey = `cart:${userId}`;
    const cacheData = {
      items: cart,
      itemCount: cart.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.quantity, 0),
      subtotal: cart.reduce(
        (sum, item) => sum + item.quantity * item.product.price, 
        0
      ),
      updatedAt: Date.now(),
    };
 
    await this.cache.set(cacheKey, cacheData, { ttl: 3600 });
  }
}
 
class InventoryService {
  async reserve(
    productId: string,
    quantity: number
  ): Promise<ReservationResult> {
    // Use database transaction with row locking
    return this.db.transaction(async (tx) => {
      const inventory = await tx.inventory.findUnique({
        where: { productId },
        lock: true,
      });
 
      if (!inventory || inventory.available < quantity) {
        return {
          success: false,
          available: inventory?.available ?? 0,
        };
      }
 
      // Decrement available inventory
      const updated = await tx.inventory.update({
        where: { productId },
        data: {
          available: { decrement: quantity },
          reserved: { increment: quantity },
        },
      });
 
      // Create reservation record for tracking
      const reservation = await tx.inventoryReservation.create({
        data: {
          productId,
          quantity,
          expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + 15 * 60 * 1000), // 15 min hold
        },
      });
 
      // Write-through: Update inventory cache
      await this.syncInventoryCache(productId, updated);
 
      return {
        success: true,
        reservationId: reservation.id,
        available: updated.available,
      };
    });
  }
 
  private async syncInventoryCache(
    productId: string, 
    inventory: Inventory
  ): Promise<void> {
    const cacheKey = `inventory:${productId}`;
    await this.cache.set(cacheKey, {
      available: inventory.available,
      reserved: inventory.reserved,
      updatedAt: Date.now(),
    }, { ttl: 300 }); // 5 minute TTL
  }
}

Flash Sales and High Concurrency

For flash sales or high-demand items, write-through alone isn't enough. You need distributed locks or optimistic concurrency control at the database level to prevent race conditions. Write-through ensures the cache reflects the truth; it doesn't prevent concurrent database conflicts.

Use Case: Session and Security

User sessions and security-related data are prime candidates for write-through caching. Security changes must propagate immediately to prevent vulnerabilities.

Scenario: Session Invalidation on Password Change When a user changes their password, all existing sessions must be immediately invalidated to prevent unauthorized access from potentially compromised sessions. The Problem with Eventual Consistency: 1. Attacker compromises user password 2. User notices and changes password 3. System updates password in database 4. Cache still has old session tokens (eventual consistency) 5. Attacker can continue using old sessions until cache expires 6. Security vulnerability window: minutes to hours With Write-Through: 1. User changes password 2. System updates password in database 3. System invalidates all sessions in database 4. Write-through: Session invalidation stored in cache immediately 5. Attacker's session is rejected on next request 6. Security vulnerability window: milliseconds

session_security.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
class SecurityService {
  async changePassword(
    userId: string,
    currentPassword: string,
    newPassword: string
  ): Promise<PasswordChangeResult> {
    // Verify current password
    const user = await this.verifyCurrentPassword(userId, currentPassword);
    if (!user) {
      return { success: false, error: 'INVALID_CURRENT_PASSWORD' };
    }
 
    // Transaction: Update password and invalidate sessions
    await this.db.transaction(async (tx) => {
      // Update password
      await tx.user.update({
        where: { id: userId },
        data: {
          passwordHash: await this.hashPassword(newPassword),
          passwordChangedAt: new Date(),
        },
      });
 
      // Record password change for audit
      await tx.securityAudit.create({
        data: {
          userId,
          action: 'PASSWORD_CHANGE',
          timestamp: new Date(),
          ip: this.getClientIp(),
        },
      });
    });
 
    // Write-through: Invalidate all sessions immediately
    await this.invalidateAllSessions(userId);
 
    // Write-through: Update user cache
    await this.syncUserCache(userId);
 
    return { 
      success: true, 
      message: 'Password changed. All sessions have been logged out.',
    };
  }
 
  private async invalidateAllSessions(userId: string): Promise<void> {
    // Delete all sessions from database
    await this.db.session.deleteMany({
      where: { userId },
    });
 
    // Write-through: Update session invalidation marker in cache
    // This is checked on every authenticated request
    const invalidationKey = `session_invalidation:${userId}`;
    await this.cache.set(invalidationKey, {
      invalidatedAt: Date.now(),
      reason: 'PASSWORD_CHANGE',
    }, { ttl: 86400 }); // 24 hour TTL
 
    // Also delete individual session caches if they exist
    const sessionKeys = await this.cache.keys(`session:${userId}:*`);
    if (sessionKeys.length > 0) {
      await this.cache.del(...sessionKeys);
    }
  }
 
  // Called on every authenticated request
  async validateSession(sessionToken: string): Promise<SessionValidation> {
    // Check session in cache first
    const cachedSession = await this.cache.get<SessionData>(
      `session:${sessionToken}`
    );
 
    if (!cachedSession) {
      // Cache miss: validate against database
      return this.validateSessionFromDatabase(sessionToken);
    }
 
    // Check for session invalidation (write-through updated this immediately)
    const invalidation = await this.cache.get<InvalidationData>(
      `session_invalidation:${cachedSession.userId}`
    );
 
    if (invalidation && invalidation.invalidatedAt > cachedSession.createdAt) {
      // Session was created before invalidation
      return { valid: false, reason: 'SESSION_INVALIDATED' };
    }
 
    return { valid: true, session: cachedSession };
  }
}
 
class PermissionService {
  async revokePermission(
    userId: string,
    permission: string
  ): Promise<void> {
    // Database update
    await this.db.userPermission.delete({
      where: { userId_permission: { userId, permission } },
    });
 
    // Write-through: Update permission cache immediately
    // Critical for security - user should lose access instantly
    await this.syncPermissionCache(userId);
  }
 
  private async syncPermissionCache(userId: string): Promise<void> {
    const permissions = await this.db.userPermission.findMany({
      where: { userId },
    });
 
    const cacheKey = `permissions:${userId}`;
    await this.cache.set(cacheKey, {
      permissions: permissions.map(p => p.permission),
      updatedAt: Date.now(),
    }, { ttl: 300 });
  }
}

Other Security Use Cases: MFA Enrollment/Revocation — Changes must be effective immediately API Key Rotation — Old keys must stop working instantly Account Lockout — Failed login thresholds must be enforced immediately Role Changes — Privilege escalation/deescalation must be immediate IP Blacklisting — Blocked IPs must be rejected instantly

Use Case: Real-Time Display Systems

Systems that display real-time information to users often benefit from write-through caching, especially when the information is critical for decision-making.

Real-Time Display Use Cases
System	Critical Data	Why Write-Through	Alternative Approaches
Dashboards	KPIs, metrics	Executives need current data for decisions	Streaming for sub-second updates
Leaderboards	Scores, rankings	Players expect immediate updates	Event sourcing for high-volume gaming
Status Pages	Service health	Incident response depends on accuracy	Push-based for real-time
Inventory Displays	Stock levels	Store staff need accurate counts	None—write-through is ideal
Booking Systems	Availability	Prevent double-booking	Locking for high contention

Scenario: Restaurant Reservation System A restaurant booking platform shows available time slots. When a reservation is made, the slot must immediately show as unavailable to prevent double-booking.

reservation_system.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
class ReservationService {
  async makeReservation(
    restaurantId: string,
    date: Date,
    time: string,
    partySize: number,
    customerId: string
  ): Promise<ReservationResult> {
    const slotKey = `${restaurantId}:${date.toISOString().split('T')[0]}:${time}`;
 
    // Use distributed lock to prevent race conditions
    const lock = await this.locks.acquire(`reservation:${slotKey}`, 5000);
 
    try {
      // Check availability in database (source of truth)
      const availability = await this.db.availability.findUnique({
        where: { slotKey },
      });
 
      if (!availability || availability.remainingCapacity < partySize) {
        return {
          success: false,
          error: 'SLOT_UNAVAILABLE',
          remainingCapacity: availability?.remainingCapacity ?? 0,
        };
      }
 
      // Create reservation and update availability atomically
      const [reservation, updatedAvailability] = await this.db.transaction(
        async (tx) => {
          const reservation = await tx.reservation.create({
            data: {
              restaurantId,
              date,
              time,
              partySize,
              customerId,
              status: 'CONFIRMED',
              confirmationCode: this.generateConfirmationCode(),
            },
          });
 
          const updated = await tx.availability.update({
            where: { slotKey },
            data: {
              remainingCapacity: { decrement: partySize },
              reservationCount: { increment: 1 },
            },
          });
 
          return [reservation, updated];
        }
      );
 
      // Write-through: Update availability cache immediately
      await this.syncAvailabilityCache(slotKey, updatedAvailability);
 
      // Write-through: Update customer's reservations cache
      await this.syncCustomerReservationsCache(customerId);
 
      return {
        success: true,
        reservation,
        confirmationCode: reservation.confirmationCode,
      };
 
    } finally {
      await lock.release();
    }
  }
 
  async getAvailability(
    restaurantId: string,
    date: Date
  ): Promise<TimeSlot[]> {
    const cacheKey = `availability:${restaurantId}:${date.toISOString().split('T')[0]}`;
    
    // Check cache first
    const cached = await this.cache.get<TimeSlot[]>(cacheKey);
    if (cached) {
      return cached;
    }
 
    // Cache miss: load from database
    const slots = await this.db.availability.findMany({
      where: {
        restaurantId,
        date,
        remainingCapacity: { gt: 0 },
      },
    });
 
    // Cache for next request (but not too long - availability changes)
    await this.cache.set(cacheKey, slots, { ttl: 60 }); // 1 minute TTL
 
    return slots;
  }
 
  private async syncAvailabilityCache(
    slotKey: string,
    availability: Availability
  ): Promise<void> {
    // Update individual slot cache
    await this.cache.set(`slot:${slotKey}`, availability, { ttl: 300 });
 
    // Invalidate the date's availability list to force refresh
    const [restaurantId, date] = slotKey.split(':');
    await this.cache.del(`availability:${restaurantId}:${date}`);
  }
}

Anti-Patterns: When NOT to Use Write-Through

Equally important as knowing when to use write-through is knowing when to avoid it. Here are scenarios where write-through is the wrong choice.

Anti-Pattern 1: High-Volume Analytics/Logging The Scenario: Website tracking page views, clicks, and user behavior Thousands of events per second per server Data is written once and rarely read immediately Why Write-Through Fails: Write latency is unacceptable for event tracking (blocks page load) Write volume overwhelms the database Immediate consistency is unnecessary for analytics Better Alternative: Write-back with batching, or write directly to a time-series database/message queue.

Anti-Pattern 2: High-Frequency Counters The Scenario: View counts, like counts, impression counters Potentially millions of increments per minute Exact real-time accuracy not critical Why Write-Through Fails: Each increment requires a database round-trip Database becomes bottleneck instantly Counter value is often approximate anyway Better Alternative: Write-back with periodic flush, Redis atomic counters with periodic database sync, or HyperLogLog for approximate counting.

Anti-Pattern 3: Large Binary Data The Scenario: Uploading images, videos, documents Files are megabytes in size Stored in object storage (S3) with metadata in database Why Write-Through Fails: Caching large binary data is expensive (memory consumption) Network transfer of large payloads is slow Read patterns are often sequential, not random access Better Alternative: Store metadata with write-through, but serve binary data directly from object storage with CDN caching.

Anti-Pattern 4: Append-Only Logs/Audit Trails The Scenario: System audit logs, compliance records Write-once, read-rarely data Historical queries, not real-time lookups Why Write-Through Fails: Data is rarely read (low cache hit rate) High write volume strains cache as well as database Caching adds no value for archival data Better Alternative: Write-around (skip cache entirely), or write directly to append-only log storage.

The Red Flags

Avoid write-through when you see: (1) write-to-read ratio > 1:1, (2) data that's rarely accessed after writing, (3) approximate values being acceptable, (4) very high write throughput requirements (>100K/sec), or (5) large payloads (>1MB). Any of these is a signal to consider alternatives.

Implementation Decision Tree

Use this decision tree when evaluating whether to implement write-through caching for a specific data type or feature.

decision_tree.txt

Text

                   Start Here
                        │
                        ▼
        ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
        │   Does data need to be cached at    │
        │   all? (High read volume, slow DB)  │
        └─────────────────────────────────────┘
                        │
              ┌─────────┼─────────┐
              │ NO      │         │ YES
              ▼         │         ▼
        ┌──────────┐    │   ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
        │ No Cache │    │   │  Is immediate consistency required? │
        │ Needed   │    │   │  (Security, financial, user-facing) │
        └──────────┘    │   └─────────────────────────────────────┘
                        │                     │
                        │         ┌───────────┼───────────┐
                        │         │ NO        │           │ YES
                        │         ▼           │           ▼
                        │   ┌──────────────┐  │   ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
                        │   │ Cache-Aside  │  │   │  Is write latency of 50ms+ okay?    │
                        │   │ (Lazy Load)  │  │   │  (Not real-time, user can wait)     │
                        │   └──────────────┘  │   └─────────────────────────────────────┘
                        │                     │                     │
                        │                     │         ┌───────────┼───────────┐
                        │                     │         │ NO        │           │ YES
                        │                     │         ▼           │           ▼
                        │                     │   ┌──────────────┐  │   ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
                        │                     │   │ Write-Back   │  │   │  Is write volume manageable?        │
                        │                     │   │ (if data loss│  │   │  (<10K writes/sec)                  │
                        │                     │   │  acceptable) │  │   └─────────────────────────────────────┘
                        │                     │   └──────────────┘  │                     │
                        │                     │                     │         ┌───────────┼───────────┐
                        │                     │                     │         │ NO        │           │ YES
                        │                     │                     │         ▼           │           ▼
                        │                     │                     │   ┌──────────────┐  │   ┌──────────────┐
                        │                     │                     │   │ Shard DB +   │  │   │ WRITE-       │
                        │                     │                     │   │ Write-Through│  │   │ THROUGH      │
                        │                     │                     │   │ OR Evaluate  │  │   │ CACHING      │
                        │                     │                     │   │ Trade-offs   │  │   │ ✓            │
                        │                     │                     │   └──────────────┘  │   └──────────────┘
                        │                     │                     │                     │
                        └─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┘

Quick Reference Summary:

If you need...	Use...
Strong consistency + durability	Write-Through
Low write latency + some consistency	Write-Back
Simple implementation + read-heavy	Cache-Aside
Write-heavy + no immediate read	Write-Around
Proactive cache warming	Refresh-Ahead

Use Cases

Choosing the Right Tool for the Job

Ideal Use Case Characteristics

Use Case: Financial Services

Use Case: E-Commerce

Use Case: Session and Security

Use Case: Real-Time Display Systems

Anti-Patterns: When NOT to Use Write-Through

Implementation Decision Tree

There’s more to understand.

Use Cases

Choosing the Right Tool for the Job

Ideal Use Case Characteristics

Use Case: Financial Services

Use Case: E-Commerce

Use Case: Session and Security

Use Case: Real-Time Display Systems

Anti-Patterns: When NOT to Use Write-Through

Implementation Decision Tree

There’s more to understand.