Thin vs Thick Client - Learning Module

Loading content...

0/273

Thick Client — Significant Local Processing

Embracing Client Capability

While thin clients delegate processing to servers, thick clients take the opposite approach: they embrace the computing power of client devices, running significant logic locally to deliver rich, responsive, and often offline-capable experiences.

Every smartphone in your pocket contains more computing power than the computers that sent astronauts to the moon. Every laptop on a desk rivals supercomputers from two decades ago. Thick client architecture asks: why waste this power? Why send everything to a server when the device in front of the user can handle much of the work itself?

This isn't merely about raw capability—it's about creating experiences that feel immediate, work anywhere, and leverage the unique capabilities of modern devices. Understanding thick client architecture is essential for building applications that demand responsiveness, offline functionality, or deep device integration.

What You Will Learn

By the end of this page, you will have mastered thick client architecture: its precise definition, core characteristics, capability spectrum, design patterns, implementation strategies, benefits, challenges, and real-world applications. You'll understand when and why to choose thick client approaches and how to implement them effectively.

Defining the Thick Client with Precision

A thick client (also called a fat client or rich client) is a computing architecture where the client device performs significant local processing—executing business logic, managing state, processing data, and potentially operating independently of a server.

Let's formalize this definition:

Thick Client Definition: A client architecture is thick when the client executes substantial business logic, maintains meaningful local state, processes data locally, and can provide significant functionality with reduced or no server connectivity.

This definition encompasses several key characteristics:

Core Characteristics of Thick Clients

•Local Business Logic Execution — The client contains and executes business rules, calculations, validations, and workflows. The client 'understands' the application domain.
•Local State Management — The client maintains significant application state in local memory or storage, not just display state. Changes can persist locally.
•Data Processing Capability — The client can transform, filter, sort, aggregate, and analyze data locally without server round-trips.
•Reduced Server Dependency — The client can provide meaningful functionality with intermittent, degraded, or no network connectivity.
•Device Capability Utilization — The client leverages local hardware: GPU, sensors, cameras, storage, offline processing power.

Thick ≠ Standalone

Being thick doesn't mean being standalone. Most thick clients still communicate with servers for data synchronization, authentication, and features requiring central coordination. 'Thick' refers to local processing capability, not isolation. A thick client is thick because of what it CAN do locally, not because it never talks to servers.

The Responsibility Distribution Model:

To understand thick clients concretely, contrast the responsibility distribution:

Responsibility	Thick Client Approach
UI Rendering	Client handles completely
User Input Capture	Client handles completely
Input Validation	Client handles (primary), server may re-validate
Business Logic	Client executes locally
Data Processing	Client handles for local data
State Management	Client manages local state
Data Persistence	Client has local storage (IndexedDB, SQLite, files)
Security Enforcement	Shared—client enforces UX, server enforces authority

This distribution creates a capable, semi-autonomous client that can function meaningfully even in isolation.

The Thick Client Spectrum

Thick client is not a binary state—it's a spectrum. Understanding this spectrum helps you position your application appropriately.

Level 1: Rich Interactive Client

The lightest form of thick client—significant UI logic and some business logic runs locally:

Single-page applications (SPAs) with client-side routing
Complex form validation and multi-step workflows
Real-time data visualization and charting
Interactive document editing

Examples: Gmail, Google Docs, Figma (web version)

Level 2: Offline-Capable Client

Clients that can function without network connectivity:

Local data storage for offline access
Queued operations synchronized when online
Service worker-based caching
Conflict resolution for concurrent modifications

Examples: Notion, Slack, Google Drive (offline mode)

Level 3: Local-First Client

Clients where local operation is primary, network is secondary:

Complete application functionality offline
Data stored locally first, synced opportunistically
Sophisticated sync and conflict resolution
Network enhances but isn't required

Examples: Obsidian, Git (the tool itself), many native mobile apps

Level 4: Peer-to-Peer Client

Clients that communicate directly, potentially without central servers:

Direct device-to-device communication
Distributed data storage
Decentralized authority
Server-optional architecture

Examples: BitTorrent clients, some cryptocurrency wallets, local multiplayer games

Level 5: Fully Standalone Client

Clients that never require network connectivity:

Complete functionality offline
All data local
Traditional desktop applications
Embedded systems

Examples: Adobe Photoshop (traditional), Microsoft Office (offline), video games (single-player)

Thick Client Spectrum: Capability Levels
Level	Network Requirement	Local Capability	Sync Complexity	Examples
Rich Interactive	Required	UI logic, validation	None	Gmail, web dashboards
Offline-Capable	Preferred	Cached reads, queued writes	Moderate	Slack, Trello
Local-First	Optional	Full functionality	High	Obsidian, Linear
Peer-to-Peer	Partial/None	Full + P2P communication	Very High	BitTorrent, AirDrop
Fully Standalone	None	Complete	N/A	Photoshop, local games

Choose Your Point on the Spectrum

Most modern applications fall somewhere in the middle of this spectrum. The key is choosing the right level for your specific requirements—going thicker adds capability but also complexity. Don't build a local-first client when online-capable would suffice, and don't build thin when your users need offline access.

Thick Client Architecture Patterns

Building effective thick clients requires deliberate architectural patterns. Here are the essential patterns for modern thick client development.

Pattern 1: Client-Side State Management

Thick clients need robust local state management—far more sophisticated than thin client approaches:

thick-client-state.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
// Sophisticated client-side state management for thick clients
import { create } from 'zustand';
import { persist, devtools } from 'zustand/middleware';
import { immer } from 'zustand/middleware/immer';
 
interface Document {
  id: string;
  title: string;
  content: string;
  lastModified: number;
  version: number;
  syncStatus: 'synced' | 'pending' | 'conflict';
}
 
interface DocumentStore {
  // Local state - persisted to IndexedDB
  documents: Map<string, Document>;
  pendingChanges: Change[];
  offlineQueued: Operation[];
  
  // Actions - all execute locally first
  createDocument: (doc: Omit<Document, 'id' | 'version' | 'syncStatus'>) => string;
  updateDocument: (id: string, updates: Partial<Document>) => void;
  deleteDocument: (id: string) => void;
  
  // Sync management
  syncWithServer: () => Promise<SyncResult>;
  resolveConflict: (id: string, resolution: 'local' | 'server' | 'merge') => void;
}
 
export const useDocumentStore = create<DocumentStore>()(
  devtools(
    persist(
      immer((set, get) => ({
        documents: new Map(),
        pendingChanges: [],
        offlineQueued: [],
        
        // Create document - LOCALLY FIRST
        createDocument: (doc) => {
          const id = generateLocalId();
          const newDoc: Document = {
            ...doc,
            id,
            version: 1,
            lastModified: Date.now(),
            syncStatus: navigator.onLine ? 'pending' : 'pending'
          };
          
          set((state) => {
            state.documents.set(id, newDoc);
            state.pendingChanges.push({
              type: 'create',
              documentId: id,
              timestamp: Date.now()
            });
          });
          
          // Queue for sync if online
          if (navigator.onLine) {
            get().syncWithServer();
          }
          
          return id; // Immediately available locally
        },
        
        // Update - client executes immediately
        updateDocument: (id, updates) => {
          set((state) => {
            const doc = state.documents.get(id);
            if (doc) {
              Object.assign(doc, updates);
              doc.lastModified = Date.now();
              doc.version++;
              doc.syncStatus = 'pending';
              state.pendingChanges.push({
                type: 'update',
                documentId: id,
                changes: updates,
                timestamp: Date.now()
              });
            }
          });
        },
        
        // Sync with server when connectivity allows
        syncWithServer: async () => {
          const { pendingChanges, documents } = get();
          // ... sync implementation
        },
        
        resolveConflict: (id, resolution) => {
          // Handle conflicts from concurrent edits
          // ... conflict resolution logic
        }
      })),
      {
        name: 'document-store',
        storage: createIndexedDBStorage() // Persist to IndexedDB
      }
    )
  )
);

Pattern 2: Local Database / Persistence

Thick clients often need structured local storage beyond simple key-value:

local-database.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
// Local database for thick client - using Dexie (IndexedDB wrapper)
import Dexie, { Table } from 'dexie';
 
interface Task {
  id: string;
  title: string;
  description: string;
  status: 'todo' | 'in-progress' | 'done';
  priority: number;
  projectId: string;
  assigneeId: string;
  createdAt: Date;
  updatedAt: Date;
  syncVersion: number;
  localOnly: boolean;
}
 
interface Project {
  id: string;
  name: string;
  color: string;
  ownerId: string;
  syncVersion: number;
}
 
class AppDatabase extends Dexie {
  tasks!: Table<Task>;
  projects!: Table<Project>;
  syncQueue!: Table<SyncOperation>;
  
  constructor() {
    super('ThickClientApp');
    
    this.version(1).stores({
      // Indexes for efficient local queries
      tasks: 'id, projectId, assigneeId, status, [projectId+status], updatedAt',
      projects: 'id, ownerId',
      syncQueue: '++id, timestamp, type, entityId'
    });
  }
}
 
const db = new AppDatabase();
 
// All queries run locally - instant response
export async function getProjectTasks(projectId: string): Promise<Task[]> {
  // No network request - queries local IndexedDB
  return await db.tasks
    .where('projectId')
    .equals(projectId)
    .sortBy('priority');
}
 
// Complex local queries
export async function searchTasks(query: string, filters: TaskFilters): Promise<Task[]> {
  let collection = db.tasks.toCollection();
  
  // Filter locally - no server needed
  if (filters.status) {
    collection = db.tasks.where('status').equals(filters.status);
  }
  
  const tasks = await collection.toArray();
  
  // Full-text search locally
  return tasks.filter(task => 
    task.title.toLowerCase().includes(query.toLowerCase()) ||
    task.description.toLowerCase().includes(query.toLowerCase())
  );
}
 
// Write locally, queue for sync
export async function createTask(task: Omit<Task, 'id' | 'syncVersion'>): Promise<Task> {
  const newTask: Task = {
    ...task,
    id: crypto.randomUUID(),
    syncVersion: 0,
    localOnly: true,
    createdAt: new Date(),
    updatedAt: new Date()
  };
  
  // 1. Write to local database instantly
  await db.tasks.add(newTask);
  
  // 2. Queue for server sync
  await db.syncQueue.add({
    type: 'create',
    entityType: 'task',
    entityId: newTask.id,
    payload: newTask,
    timestamp: Date.now()
  });
  
  // 3. Return immediately - user doesn't wait for server
  return newTask;
}

Pattern 3: Service Worker for Offline and Caching

Service workers enable thick client capabilities in web applications:

service-worker.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
// Service worker for thick client web app
/// <reference lib="webworker" />
 
declare const self: ServiceWorkerGlobalScope;
 
const CACHE_NAME = 'app-v1';
const OFFLINE_API_CACHE = 'api-cache-v1';
 
// Assets to pre-cache for offline capability
const PRECACHE_ASSETS = [
  '/',
  '/index.html',
  '/app.js',
  '/app.css',
  '/offline.html',
  '/manifest.json',
];
 
// Install: pre-cache essential assets
self.addEventListener('install', (event) => {
  event.waitUntil(
    caches.open(CACHE_NAME)
      .then(cache => cache.addAll(PRECACHE_ASSETS))
      .then(() => self.skipWaiting())
  );
});
 
// Fetch: sophisticated offline strategy
self.addEventListener('fetch', (event) => {
  const { request } = event;
  const url = new URL(request.url);
  
  // API requests: network-first with offline fallback
  if (url.pathname.startsWith('/api/')) {
    event.respondWith(handleApiRequest(request));
    return;
  }
  
  // App shell: cache-first for instant loading
  event.respondWith(
    caches.match(request)
      .then(cached => cached || fetch(request))
      .catch(() => caches.match('/offline.html'))
  );
});
 
async function handleApiRequest(request: Request): Promise<Response> {
  // Try network first
  try {
    const response = await fetch(request);
    
    // Cache successful GET responses
    if (request.method === 'GET' && response.ok) {
      const cache = await caches.open(OFFLINE_API_CACHE);
      cache.put(request, response.clone());
    }
    
    return response;
  } catch (error) {
    // Network failed - check cache
    const cached = await caches.match(request);
    if (cached) return cached;
    
    // For mutations: queue and acknowledge
    if (request.method !== 'GET') {
      // Store in IndexedDB for later sync
      await queueOfflineOperation(request);
      return new Response(
        JSON.stringify({ queued: true, message: 'Saved offline' }),
        { status: 202, headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } }
      );
    }
    
    // No cache, no network
    return new Response(
      JSON.stringify({ error: 'Offline and no cached data' }),
      { status: 503 }
    );
  }
}
 
// Background sync when connectivity returns
self.addEventListener('sync', (event) => {
  if (event.tag === 'background-sync') {
    event.waitUntil(syncQueuedOperations());
  }
});

The Thick Client Triad

Effective thick clients typically combine three elements: sophisticated state management (what the app knows), local persistence (what survives refresh/restart), and offline infrastructure (what works without network). Master all three to build truly capable thick clients.

Benefits of Thick Client Architecture

Thick client architecture offers compelling advantages that make it the right choice for many modern applications.

Benefit 1: Instant Responsiveness

Local processing means instant feedback:

Zero network latency for local operations
60 FPS interactions possible (16ms frame times vs 100ms+ network round trips)
Real-time experiences — games, collaborative editing, creative tools
Smooth animations and transitions — no waiting for server
Optimistic updates that feel instant

Thin Client Latency

•User clicks button
•Request sent to server (~50ms)
•Server processes (~20ms)
•Response transmitted (~50ms)
•UI updates (10ms)
•Total: ~130ms minimum

Thick Client Latency

•User clicks button
•Local handler executes (~5ms)
•State updates (~2ms)
•UI re-renders (~10ms)
•
•Total: ~17ms

Benefit 2: Offline Functionality

Thick clients can work without network:

Continue working during outages — network issues don't stop productivity
Remote/travel scenarios — airplanes, subways, rural areas
Resilience to server failures — client keeps working
Save and sync later — changes queued for when connectivity returns
Privacy-sensitive workflows — data never leaves device

Benefit 3: Reduced Server Load and Costs

Computation distributed to clients reduces server burden:

Server Load: Thin vs Thick Client Comparison
Metric	Thin Client	Thick Client	Savings
API Requests/User/Day	~500	~50	90% reduction
Server CPU per User	High (all logic)	Low (sync only)	70-90% reduction
Bandwidth per User	High (full data each time)	Low (deltas only)	60-80% reduction
Peak Server Capacity	Size for all users	Size for sync load	5-10x smaller
Real-time Features Cost	WebSocket per user	Push notifications	Significantly lower

Benefit 4: Device Capability Access

Thick clients can leverage local hardware:

Camera and microphone — AR filters, video editing
GPU acceleration — graphics, ML inference, video processing
Sensors — GPS, accelerometer, barometer
Local files — drag and drop, file system access
Bluetooth/NFC — device pairing, contactless features
Secure enclaves — biometrics, secure storage

Benefit 5: Rich, Complex Interfaces

Some interfaces simply require thick clients:

Professional creative tools — Photoshop, video editors, DAWs
Gaming — real-time graphics, physics, AI
Data visualization — interactive charts, 3D rendering
CAD/engineering software — precision manipulation
IDE/development tools — code intelligence, refactoring

The User Experience Edge

For user-facing applications where experience matters, thick clients often provide a decisive advantage. Users notice the difference between 15ms and 150ms response times. The 'snappiness' of thick client applications translates directly into user satisfaction and engagement.

Thick Client Challenges and Complexities

Thick client architecture introduces significant challenges that must be carefully managed. Understanding these helps you plan appropriately.

Challenge 1: Data Synchronization Complexity

When data lives in multiple places, synchronization becomes a core challenge:

Conflict resolution — What happens when two users edit the same document offline?
Eventual consistency — Client and server may have different views temporarily
Merge strategies — Last-write-wins? Operational transforms? CRDTs?
Partial sync — Not all data fits on all devices
Sync failures — What happens when sync partially completes?

sync-complexity.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
// Synchronization is where thick clients get complex
 
interface SyncResult {
  synced: string[];      // Successfully synced entities
  conflicts: Conflict[]; // Requires manual resolution
  failed: string[];      // Need retry
}
 
interface Conflict {
  entityId: string;
  localVersion: Document;
  serverVersion: Document;
  localChanges: Change[];
  serverChanges: Change[];
  suggestedResolution: 'local' | 'server' | 'merge';
}
 
async function synchronize(): Promise<SyncResult> {
  const pendingChanges = await db.syncQueue.toArray();
  const result: SyncResult = { synced: [], conflicts: [], failed: [] };
  
  for (const change of pendingChanges) {
    try {
      const serverResult = await pushToServer(change);
      
      if (serverResult.status === 'conflict') {
        // Server has newer version - need to resolve
        const conflict: Conflict = {
          entityId: change.entityId,
          localVersion: await db[change.entityType].get(change.entityId),
          serverVersion: serverResult.serverVersion,
          localChanges: getLocalChanges(change.entityId),
          serverChanges: serverResult.changesSinceLastSync,
          suggestedResolution: determineResolution(change, serverResult)
        };
        
        result.conflicts.push(conflict);
        
        // Auto-resolve if possible, else require user decision
        if (canAutoResolve(conflict)) {
          await autoResolve(conflict);
          result.synced.push(change.entityId);
        }
      } else {
        // Successfully synced
        await db.syncQueue.delete(change.id);
        await updateLocalVersion(change.entityId, serverResult.newVersion);
        result.synced.push(change.entityId);
      }
    } catch (error) {
      result.failed.push(change.entityId);
      // Will retry on next sync attempt
    }
  }
  
  // Pull any server changes we don't have
  await pullServerChanges();
  
  return result;
}
 
// This is just the happy path - real sync is much more complex:
// - Partial failures mid-sync
// - Network drops during sync
// - Large data sets that can't sync atomically
// - Schema migrations between versions
// - ...and more

Challenge 2: Client Update and Version Management

With logic on clients, version management becomes critical:

Multiple versions in the wild — Users don't all update simultaneously
Breaking changes — API changes must support old clients
Force updates — When security issues require immediate action
A/B testing complexity — Different client versions, different behaviors
Bug containment — A bug ships to users, can't hotfix like server

Challenge 3: Security Considerations

Code running on client devices is inherently less trusted:

Thick Client Security Concerns

•Code is visible — JavaScript can be inspected, decompiled, reverse-engineered
•Client validation can be bypassed — Server MUST validate; client validation is just UX
•Secrets exposed — API keys in client code are not secret
•Tampering risk — Local data can be modified by sophisticated users
•Intellectual property exposure — Algorithms in client code are visible

Challenge 4: Development and Testing Complexity

Thick clients have larger codebases with more complexity:

Larger client bundles — More code to download
More test surface — Client logic needs unit, integration, e2e tests
State explosion — Many possible local states to handle
Browser/device compatibility — Logic must work across environments
Developer expertise — Full-stack client skills required

Challenge 5: Local Storage Limitations

Client storage has real constraints:

Storage quotas — Browsers limit IndexedDB size (often 50-100MB)
Eviction risk — Browsers can clear storage under memory pressure
Encryption complexity — Sensitive local data needs protection
Cross-device sync — User's data trapped on one device without sync

The Sync Tax

Data synchronization alone can consume 30-50% of thick client development effort. Before choosing thick client architecture, honestly assess whether your team can handle this complexity. Many projects underestimate the sync challenge and end up with buggy, frustrating user experiences.

Real-World Thick Client Implementations

Let's examine how major applications implement thick client architecture in production.

Notion: Local-First with Cloud Sync

Notion exemplifies modern thick client architecture:

Local SQLite database — Complete workspace stored locally
Offline functionality — Read, write, organize without network
Real-time collaboration — CRDTs for conflict-free concurrent editing
Background sync — Changes sync when connectivity allows
Cross-device experience — Same thick client on web, desktop, mobile

Notion's UX feels snappy because most operations never wait for network—they execute locally and sync in the background.

Figma: Heavy Client-Side Processing

Figma, the web-based design tool, demonstrates extreme thick client capabilities:

WebGL rendering engine — Complex graphics rendered client-side
WASM-based core — Performance-critical code compiled to WebAssembly
Client-side constraint solving — Auto-layout calculations local
Collaborative editing — CRDTs for real-time multi-user editing
Large file handling — Designs stay client-side, not round-tripped to server

Spotify (Mobile App): Offline-First Music

Spotify's mobile app is a classic thick client:

Local music cache — Downloaded songs play offline
Playlist management offline — Create, edit, organize without network
Playback engine local — Audio processing, equalization local
Smart caching — Predicts and pre-downloads likely-to-play content
Syncs when online — Listening history, playlists sync opportunistically

Thick Client Patterns in Major Applications
Application	Local Capability	Sync Approach	Offline Mode
Notion	Complete workspace, editing, organization	CRDT-based real-time sync	Full read/write offline
Figma	Design rendering, editing, auto-layout	Operational transforms	Read-only offline
Linear	Issues, projects, search	Sync engine	Full offline
VS Code	Complete IDE functionality	Settings/extensions sync	Fully standalone capable
Slack	Messages, channels, search	Incremental sync	Limited offline access
Obsidian	Complete note editing, linking	Files on disk + optional sync	Fully offline

VS Code: Electron Thick Client

VS Code demonstrates traditional thick client architecture:

Full Node.js runtime — Complete backend capabilities in the client
Local file system access — Direct manipulation of project files
Extension ecosystem — Extensions run locally with full capability
Language servers — Intelligent code features run locally
Git integration — Source control operations local

VS Code can function completely offline—it's essentially a full development environment packaged as a desktop application.

The Productivity App Trend

Notice a pattern: modern productivity applications (Notion, Linear, Obsidian, Figma) overwhelmingly choose thick client architecture. When user experience is paramount and data belongs to users, thick clients shine. The development complexity trade-off is worth it for tools people use hours per day.

Thick Client Technologies and Frameworks

Modern thick client development is supported by mature technologies across platforms.

Web Thick Client Stack:

Web Technologies for Thick Clients
Category	Technologies	Use Case
State Management	Zustand, Redux, MobX, Jotai, TanStack Query	Complex local state, caching, sync
Local Database	IndexedDB, Dexie.js, PouchDB, sql.js, OPFS	Structured offline storage
Offline/Caching	Service Workers, Workbox	Offline capability, asset caching
Sync Engines	Replicache, TinyBase, ElectricSQL, PowerSync	Server sync, conflict resolution
Real-time Collaboration	Yjs, Automerge (CRDTs)	Conflict-free concurrent editing
Performance	WebAssembly, Web Workers	CPU-intensive local processing

Native Desktop Thick Client Stack:

Electron — Web technologies for desktop (VS Code, Slack, Discord)
Tauri — Rust + web frontend, smaller footprint than Electron
Qt — Cross-platform C++ framework
.NET MAUI / WPF — Microsoft's desktop frameworks
SwiftUI / AppKit — macOS native development

Mobile Thick Client Stack:

React Native — JavaScript with native modules
Flutter — Dart-based cross-platform with local DB support
SwiftUI / UIKit — iOS native with Core Data, SwiftData
Jetpack Compose / Android SDK — Android native with Room database

thick-client-stack.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
// Modern web thick client technology stack example
 
// State management with Zustand
import { create } from 'zustand';
import { persist } from 'zustand/middleware';
 
// Local database with Dexie (IndexedDB)
import Dexie from 'dexie';
 
// Sync engine with Replicache
import { Replicache } from 'replicache';
 
// Real-time collaboration with Yjs
import * as Y from 'yjs';
 
// Example: Local-first task manager
 
// 1. Define local database schema
class TaskDB extends Dexie {
  tasks!: Table<Task>;
  constructor() {
    super('TaskApp');
    this.version(1).stores({
      tasks: 'id, projectId, status, [projectId+status]'
    });
  }
}
 
// 2. Client state with persistence
const useTaskStore = create(
  persist(
    (set, get) => ({
      tasks: new Map(),
      filters: { status: 'all', project: null },
      // ... actions
    }),
    { name: 'task-store' }
  )
);
 
// 3. Sync with server using Replicache
const rep = new Replicache({
  name: 'user-123',
  licenseKey: process.env.REPLICACHE_LICENSE,
  pushURL: '/api/replicache/push',
  pullURL: '/api/replicache/pull',
  mutators: {
    async createTask(tx, task: Task) {
      await tx.put(`task/${task.id}`, task);
    },
    async updateTask(tx, { id, updates }: { id: string; updates: Partial<Task> }) {
      const existing = await tx.get(`task/${id}`);
      if (existing) {
        await tx.put(`task/${id}`, { ...existing, ...updates });
      }
    },
  }
});
 
// 4. Real-time collaboration with Yjs
const ydoc = new Y.Doc();
const ymap = ydoc.getMap('tasks');
 
// All of this creates a thick client that:
// - Works offline
// - Syncs automatically when online
// - Supports real-time collaboration
// - Feels instant to the user

The Local-First Movement

The 'local-first' software movement advocates for thick clients as the default. Projects like Ink & Switch's research, the Local-First Web Development movement, and tools like Replicache are making it easier to build thick clients with robust sync. This is an active, growing area of software development.

Design Guidelines for Thick Client Architecture

Building effective thick clients requires deliberate design. Here are essential guidelines.

Guideline 1: Server Remains Authoritative

Even in thick clients, the server is the source of truth:

All client validation must be re-validated server-side — Client validation is UX, server validation is security
Server assigns authoritative IDs when possible — Or use UUIDs that are globally unique
Server resolves conflicts — When two clients disagree, server decides
Never trust client state for authorization — Check permissions server-side on every operation

Server Authority Checklist

•Client optimistically updates UI → Server confirms or rejects
•Client proposes changes → Server validates and applies
•Client stores local state → Server stores authoritative state
•Client displays permissions → Server enforces permissions
•Client generates temporary IDs → Server assigns permanent IDs or validates UUIDs

Guideline 2: Design for Conflict

Conflicts will happen—design for them:

Last-write-wins — Simplest; acceptable for low-collaboration scenarios
Merge strategies — Combine changes when possible
User resolution — Surface conflicts to user with clear options
CRDTs — Use conflict-free data structures for highly collaborative data

Guideline 3: Optimize for Perceived Performance

Use thick client capabilities to create instant-feeling experiences:

optimistic-updates.ts
TypeScript
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
// Optimistic updates for instant feedback
 
async function completeTask(taskId: string): Promise<void> {
  const previousState = getTaskState(taskId);
  
  // 1. IMMEDIATELY update UI - user sees instant feedback
  updateLocalState(taskId, { status: 'done', completedAt: new Date() });
  
  try {
    // 2. Sync to server in background
    await api.tasks.complete(taskId);
    
    // 3. Server confirmed - update local with any server changes (new version, etc.)
    const serverTask = await api.tasks.get(taskId);
    updateLocalState(taskId, serverTask);
    
  } catch (error) {
    // 4. Server rejected - revert to previous state
    updateLocalState(taskId, previousState);
    
    // 5. Show user-friendly error
    showToast('Failed to complete task. Please try again.');
    
    // 6. Log for debugging
    console.error('Task completion failed:', error);
  }
}
 
// User experience:
// - Click "Complete" → Task immediately shows as done (< 16ms)
// - In background: server sync happens (100-300ms)
// - If sync fails: task reverts with friendly error
// 
// Without optimistic updates:
// - Click "Complete" → Loading spinner for 100-300ms → Task shows as done
// - Web feels sluggish compared to native apps

Guideline 4: Handle Edge Cases Gracefully

Thick clients must handle many edge cases:

Offline transitions — What happens when connectivity drops?
Slow networks — Gracefully degrade, don't timeout abruptly
Storage errors — What if local storage is full?
Stale data — How long is cached data valid?
Multi-device — Same user, different devices, different local states

The Golden Rule

For thick clients: be optimistic in the UI, be paranoid in the logic. Show users instant feedback while handling all the ways things can go wrong in the background. Never sacrifice user experience for engineering convenience, but never trust client state for security.

Summary: The Thick Client Foundation

We've explored thick client architecture comprehensively—from fundamental definitions to implementation patterns and real-world examples. Let's consolidate the essential takeaways:

Key Takeaways

•Thick clients perform significant local processing — Business logic, data processing, and state management happen on the client.
•A spectrum exists — From rich interactive to fully standalone, choose the appropriate level for your needs.
•Key benefits are responsiveness and offline capability — Local execution means instant feedback and network independence.
•Key challenges are sync complexity and security — Data synchronization is hard; server must remain authoritative.
•Modern tools make thick clients more accessible — CRDTs, sync engines, and offline-first frameworks reduce complexity.
•Leading applications embrace thick client patterns — Notion, Figma, VS Code, Spotify demonstrate the power of local-first design.

What's next:

Now that we understand both thin and thick client architectures individually, we'll explore the trade-offs between them: bandwidth, latency, complexity, and how to choose the right point on the spectrum for your specific requirements. This comparative analysis will give you the framework to make informed architectural decisions.

Page Complete

You now possess a deep understanding of thick client architecture—its definition, spectrum, patterns, benefits, challenges, and implementations. Combined with your thin client knowledge, you're ready to analyze the trade-offs and make informed choices for your applications.