There are 3 main approaches to solve this problem:
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to track the maximum profit in two states: holding a stock and not holding a stock.
Let's define two variables:
cash
: the maximum profit we can have if we don't hold a stock at the end of day i.hold
: the maximum profit we can have if we hold a stock at the end of day i.For each day, we have the following state transitions:
cash = max(cash, hold + prices[i] - fee)
: We either keep our cash from the previous day, or we sell the stock we're holding and pay the transaction fee.hold = max(hold, cash - prices[i])
: We either keep holding the stock from the previous day, or we buy a new stock using our cash.At the end, the maximum profit will be in the cash
state, as we want to end up without holding any stock.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
Another way to think about this problem is as a state machine with two states: holding a stock and not holding a stock. We can transition between these states by buying or selling.
This approach is essentially the same as the dynamic programming approach, but it provides a different mental model for understanding the problem.
The key insight is that at each day, we want to maximize our profit in each state, and we can only transition between states by buying or selling.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
We can also solve this problem using a greedy approach by thinking about the problem in terms of buying at valleys and selling at peaks, while accounting for the transaction fee.
The key insight is that we want to buy at the lowest possible price and sell at the highest possible price, but we need to account for the transaction fee when deciding whether to sell.
We can keep track of the minimum buying price (adjusted for previous profits) and sell when the current price minus the fee is greater than this minimum buying price.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314function maxProfit(prices, fee): n = length of prices if n <= 1: return 0 cash = 0 // Maximum profit with no stock hold = -prices[0] // Maximum profit with a stock for i from 1 to n-1: prevCash = cash cash = max(cash, hold + prices[i] - fee) // Sell or keep cash hold = max(hold, prevCash - prices[i]) // Buy or keep holding return cash
Understand different approaches to solve the stock trader with fees problem and analyze their efficiency.
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to track the maximum profit in two states: holding a stock and not holding a stock.
Let's define two variables:
cash
: the maximum profit we can have if we don't hold a stock at the end of day i.hold
: the maximum profit we can have if we hold a stock at the end of day i.For each day, we have the following state transitions:
cash = max(cash, hold + prices[i] - fee)
: We either keep our cash from the previous day, or we sell the stock we're holding and pay the transaction fee.hold = max(hold, cash - prices[i])
: We either keep holding the stock from the previous day, or we buy a new stock using our cash.At the end, the maximum profit will be in the cash
state, as we want to end up without holding any stock.
Another way to think about this problem is as a state machine with two states: holding a stock and not holding a stock. We can transition between these states by buying or selling.
This approach is essentially the same as the dynamic programming approach, but it provides a different mental model for understanding the problem.
The key insight is that at each day, we want to maximize our profit in each state, and we can only transition between states by buying or selling.
We can also solve this problem using a greedy approach by thinking about the problem in terms of buying at valleys and selling at peaks, while accounting for the transaction fee.
The key insight is that we want to buy at the lowest possible price and sell at the highest possible price, but we need to account for the transaction fee when deciding whether to sell.
We can keep track of the minimum buying price (adjusted for previous profits) and sell when the current price minus the fee is greater than this minimum buying price.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314function maxProfit(prices, fee): n = length of prices if n <= 1: return 0 cash = 0 // Maximum profit with no stock hold = -prices[0] // Maximum profit with a stock for i from 1 to n-1: prevCash = cash cash = max(cash, hold + prices[i] - fee) // Sell or keep cash hold = max(hold, prevCash - prices[i]) // Buy or keep holding return cash
1234567891011121314151617function maxProfit(prices, fee): n = length of prices if n <= 1: return 0 profit = 0 buyPrice = prices[0] for i from 1 to n-1: if prices[i] < buyPrice: buyPrice = prices[i] // Found a lower buying price else if prices[i] > buyPrice + fee: // We can make a profit after paying the fee profit += prices[i] - buyPrice - fee buyPrice = prices[i] - fee // Adjust buying price for next transaction return profit
There are 3 main approaches to solve this problem:
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to track the maximum profit in two states: holding a stock and not holding a stock.
Let's define two variables:
cash
: the maximum profit we can have if we don't hold a stock at the end of day i.hold
: the maximum profit we can have if we hold a stock at the end of day i.For each day, we have the following state transitions:
cash = max(cash, hold + prices[i] - fee)
: We either keep our cash from the previous day, or we sell the stock we're holding and pay the transaction fee.hold = max(hold, cash - prices[i])
: We either keep holding the stock from the previous day, or we buy a new stock using our cash.At the end, the maximum profit will be in the cash
state, as we want to end up without holding any stock.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
Another way to think about this problem is as a state machine with two states: holding a stock and not holding a stock. We can transition between these states by buying or selling.
This approach is essentially the same as the dynamic programming approach, but it provides a different mental model for understanding the problem.
The key insight is that at each day, we want to maximize our profit in each state, and we can only transition between states by buying or selling.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
We can also solve this problem using a greedy approach by thinking about the problem in terms of buying at valleys and selling at peaks, while accounting for the transaction fee.
The key insight is that we want to buy at the lowest possible price and sell at the highest possible price, but we need to account for the transaction fee when deciding whether to sell.
We can keep track of the minimum buying price (adjusted for previous profits) and sell when the current price minus the fee is greater than this minimum buying price.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314function maxProfit(prices, fee): n = length of prices if n <= 1: return 0 cash = 0 // Maximum profit with no stock hold = -prices[0] // Maximum profit with a stock for i from 1 to n-1: prevCash = cash cash = max(cash, hold + prices[i] - fee) // Sell or keep cash hold = max(hold, prevCash - prices[i]) // Buy or keep holding return cash
Understand different approaches to solve the stock trader with fees problem and analyze their efficiency.
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to track the maximum profit in two states: holding a stock and not holding a stock.
Let's define two variables:
cash
: the maximum profit we can have if we don't hold a stock at the end of day i.hold
: the maximum profit we can have if we hold a stock at the end of day i.For each day, we have the following state transitions:
cash = max(cash, hold + prices[i] - fee)
: We either keep our cash from the previous day, or we sell the stock we're holding and pay the transaction fee.hold = max(hold, cash - prices[i])
: We either keep holding the stock from the previous day, or we buy a new stock using our cash.At the end, the maximum profit will be in the cash
state, as we want to end up without holding any stock.
Another way to think about this problem is as a state machine with two states: holding a stock and not holding a stock. We can transition between these states by buying or selling.
This approach is essentially the same as the dynamic programming approach, but it provides a different mental model for understanding the problem.
The key insight is that at each day, we want to maximize our profit in each state, and we can only transition between states by buying or selling.
We can also solve this problem using a greedy approach by thinking about the problem in terms of buying at valleys and selling at peaks, while accounting for the transaction fee.
The key insight is that we want to buy at the lowest possible price and sell at the highest possible price, but we need to account for the transaction fee when deciding whether to sell.
We can keep track of the minimum buying price (adjusted for previous profits) and sell when the current price minus the fee is greater than this minimum buying price.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
Where n is the length of the prices array. We iterate through the array once, performing constant-time operations at each step.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314function maxProfit(prices, fee): n = length of prices if n <= 1: return 0 cash = 0 // Maximum profit with no stock hold = -prices[0] // Maximum profit with a stock for i from 1 to n-1: prevCash = cash cash = max(cash, hold + prices[i] - fee) // Sell or keep cash hold = max(hold, prevCash - prices[i]) // Buy or keep holding return cash
1234567891011121314151617function maxProfit(prices, fee): n = length of prices if n <= 1: return 0 profit = 0 buyPrice = prices[0] for i from 1 to n-1: if prices[i] < buyPrice: buyPrice = prices[i] // Found a lower buying price else if prices[i] > buyPrice + fee: // We can make a profit after paying the fee profit += prices[i] - buyPrice - fee buyPrice = prices[i] - fee // Adjust buying price for next transaction return profit