There are 4 main approaches to solve this problem:
Let's start with a recursive approach to understand the problem better. We can break down the problem into smaller subproblems.
Thinking Process: At each position in the string, we have at most two choices:
We can use recursion to explore all possible ways to decode the string. For each position, we try both options (if valid) and sum up the total number of ways.
Intuition: This is a classic decision tree problem where at each step we have at most two choices. The total number of ways is the sum of ways from all valid choices.
In the worst case, we might have two choices at each position, leading to an exponential number of recursive calls.
The space complexity is O(n) due to the recursion stack, where n is the length of the input string.
The recursive approach works but is inefficient due to overlapping subproblems. We can optimize it using memoization.
Thinking Process: We notice that we're solving the same subproblems multiple times in the recursive approach. For example, if we have the string "12345", the ways to decode "345" might be calculated multiple times.
To avoid this redundancy, we can use memoization to store the results of subproblems we've already solved. This way, when we encounter the same subproblem again, we can simply look up the result instead of recalculating it.
Intuition: Memoization transforms our exponential solution into a linear one by eliminating redundant calculations.
With memoization, each position is processed at most once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We use O(n) space for the memoization array and the recursion stack.
We can further optimize our solution by using a bottom-up dynamic programming approach, which eliminates the need for recursion.
Thinking Process: Instead of starting from the beginning and working our way to the end (top-down), we can start from the end and work our way to the beginning (bottom-up).
Let's define dp[i]
as the number of ways to decode the substring s[i...n-1]
. The base case is dp[n] = 1
, representing an empty string which has 1 way to decode (doing nothing).
Intuition: By building our solution from smaller subproblems to larger ones, we can avoid recursion and its associated overhead.
We process each position once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the DP values.
We can further optimize the space complexity of our solution by observing that we only need the last two DP values at any point.
Thinking Process: When calculating dp[i]
, we only need the values of dp[i+1]
and dp[i+2]
. This means we don't need to store the entire DP array; we can just keep track of these two values.
Intuition: By using just two variables instead of an array, we can reduce the space complexity from O(n) to O(1).
We still process each position once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314151617181920function numDecodings(s): // Base case: empty string has 1 way to decode if s is empty: return 1 // If the string starts with '0', it cannot be decoded if s[0] == '0': return 0 // Initialize result ways = 0 // Option 1: Take a single digit ways += numDecodings(s[1:]) // Option 2: Take two digits if valid if length of s >= 2 and (s[0] == '1' or (s[0] == '2' and s[1] <= '6')): ways += numDecodings(s[2:]) return ways
Understand different approaches to solve the secret message decoder problem and analyze their efficiency.
Let's start with a recursive approach to understand the problem better. We can break down the problem into smaller subproblems.
Thinking Process: At each position in the string, we have at most two choices:
We can use recursion to explore all possible ways to decode the string. For each position, we try both options (if valid) and sum up the total number of ways.
Intuition: This is a classic decision tree problem where at each step we have at most two choices. The total number of ways is the sum of ways from all valid choices.
The recursive approach works but is inefficient due to overlapping subproblems. We can optimize it using memoization.
Thinking Process: We notice that we're solving the same subproblems multiple times in the recursive approach. For example, if we have the string "12345", the ways to decode "345" might be calculated multiple times.
To avoid this redundancy, we can use memoization to store the results of subproblems we've already solved. This way, when we encounter the same subproblem again, we can simply look up the result instead of recalculating it.
Intuition: Memoization transforms our exponential solution into a linear one by eliminating redundant calculations.
We can further optimize our solution by using a bottom-up dynamic programming approach, which eliminates the need for recursion.
Thinking Process: Instead of starting from the beginning and working our way to the end (top-down), we can start from the end and work our way to the beginning (bottom-up).
Let's define dp[i]
as the number of ways to decode the substring s[i...n-1]
. The base case is dp[n] = 1
, representing an empty string which has 1 way to decode (doing nothing).
Intuition: By building our solution from smaller subproblems to larger ones, we can avoid recursion and its associated overhead.
We can further optimize the space complexity of our solution by observing that we only need the last two DP values at any point.
Thinking Process: When calculating dp[i]
, we only need the values of dp[i+1]
and dp[i+2]
. This means we don't need to store the entire DP array; we can just keep track of these two values.
Intuition: By using just two variables instead of an array, we can reduce the space complexity from O(n) to O(1).
In the worst case, we might have two choices at each position, leading to an exponential number of recursive calls.
The space complexity is O(n) due to the recursion stack, where n is the length of the input string.
With memoization, each position is processed at most once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We use O(n) space for the memoization array and the recursion stack.
We process each position once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the DP values.
We still process each position once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314151617181920function numDecodings(s): // Base case: empty string has 1 way to decode if s is empty: return 1 // If the string starts with '0', it cannot be decoded if s[0] == '0': return 0 // Initialize result ways = 0 // Option 1: Take a single digit ways += numDecodings(s[1:]) // Option 2: Take two digits if valid if length of s >= 2 and (s[0] == '1' or (s[0] == '2' and s[1] <= '6')): ways += numDecodings(s[2:]) return ways
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728function numDecodings(s): memo = new Map() function decode(i): // Base case: reached the end of the string if i == length of s: return 1 // If already computed, return from memo if i in memo: return memo[i] // If current digit is '0', it cannot be decoded on its own if s[i] == '0': return 0 // Option 1: Take a single digit ways = decode(i + 1) // Option 2: Take two digits if valid if i + 1 < length of s and (s[i] == '1' or (s[i] == '2' and s[i+1] <= '6')): ways += decode(i + 2) // Store result in memo memo[i] = ways return ways return decode(0)
123456789101112131415161718192021function numDecodings(s): n = length of s dp = new array of size n+1 // Base case: empty string has 1 way to decode dp[n] = 1 // Fill dp array from right to left for i from n-1 down to 0: // If current digit is '0', it cannot be decoded on its own if s[i] == '0': dp[i] = 0 else: // Option 1: Take a single digit dp[i] = dp[i+1] // Option 2: Take two digits if valid if i+1 < n and (s[i] == '1' or (s[i] == '2' and s[i+1] <= '6')): dp[i] += dp[i+2] return dp[0]
There are 4 main approaches to solve this problem:
Let's start with a recursive approach to understand the problem better. We can break down the problem into smaller subproblems.
Thinking Process: At each position in the string, we have at most two choices:
We can use recursion to explore all possible ways to decode the string. For each position, we try both options (if valid) and sum up the total number of ways.
Intuition: This is a classic decision tree problem where at each step we have at most two choices. The total number of ways is the sum of ways from all valid choices.
In the worst case, we might have two choices at each position, leading to an exponential number of recursive calls.
The space complexity is O(n) due to the recursion stack, where n is the length of the input string.
The recursive approach works but is inefficient due to overlapping subproblems. We can optimize it using memoization.
Thinking Process: We notice that we're solving the same subproblems multiple times in the recursive approach. For example, if we have the string "12345", the ways to decode "345" might be calculated multiple times.
To avoid this redundancy, we can use memoization to store the results of subproblems we've already solved. This way, when we encounter the same subproblem again, we can simply look up the result instead of recalculating it.
Intuition: Memoization transforms our exponential solution into a linear one by eliminating redundant calculations.
With memoization, each position is processed at most once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We use O(n) space for the memoization array and the recursion stack.
We can further optimize our solution by using a bottom-up dynamic programming approach, which eliminates the need for recursion.
Thinking Process: Instead of starting from the beginning and working our way to the end (top-down), we can start from the end and work our way to the beginning (bottom-up).
Let's define dp[i]
as the number of ways to decode the substring s[i...n-1]
. The base case is dp[n] = 1
, representing an empty string which has 1 way to decode (doing nothing).
Intuition: By building our solution from smaller subproblems to larger ones, we can avoid recursion and its associated overhead.
We process each position once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the DP values.
We can further optimize the space complexity of our solution by observing that we only need the last two DP values at any point.
Thinking Process: When calculating dp[i]
, we only need the values of dp[i+1]
and dp[i+2]
. This means we don't need to store the entire DP array; we can just keep track of these two values.
Intuition: By using just two variables instead of an array, we can reduce the space complexity from O(n) to O(1).
We still process each position once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314151617181920function numDecodings(s): // Base case: empty string has 1 way to decode if s is empty: return 1 // If the string starts with '0', it cannot be decoded if s[0] == '0': return 0 // Initialize result ways = 0 // Option 1: Take a single digit ways += numDecodings(s[1:]) // Option 2: Take two digits if valid if length of s >= 2 and (s[0] == '1' or (s[0] == '2' and s[1] <= '6')): ways += numDecodings(s[2:]) return ways
Understand different approaches to solve the secret message decoder problem and analyze their efficiency.
Let's start with a recursive approach to understand the problem better. We can break down the problem into smaller subproblems.
Thinking Process: At each position in the string, we have at most two choices:
We can use recursion to explore all possible ways to decode the string. For each position, we try both options (if valid) and sum up the total number of ways.
Intuition: This is a classic decision tree problem where at each step we have at most two choices. The total number of ways is the sum of ways from all valid choices.
The recursive approach works but is inefficient due to overlapping subproblems. We can optimize it using memoization.
Thinking Process: We notice that we're solving the same subproblems multiple times in the recursive approach. For example, if we have the string "12345", the ways to decode "345" might be calculated multiple times.
To avoid this redundancy, we can use memoization to store the results of subproblems we've already solved. This way, when we encounter the same subproblem again, we can simply look up the result instead of recalculating it.
Intuition: Memoization transforms our exponential solution into a linear one by eliminating redundant calculations.
We can further optimize our solution by using a bottom-up dynamic programming approach, which eliminates the need for recursion.
Thinking Process: Instead of starting from the beginning and working our way to the end (top-down), we can start from the end and work our way to the beginning (bottom-up).
Let's define dp[i]
as the number of ways to decode the substring s[i...n-1]
. The base case is dp[n] = 1
, representing an empty string which has 1 way to decode (doing nothing).
Intuition: By building our solution from smaller subproblems to larger ones, we can avoid recursion and its associated overhead.
We can further optimize the space complexity of our solution by observing that we only need the last two DP values at any point.
Thinking Process: When calculating dp[i]
, we only need the values of dp[i+1]
and dp[i+2]
. This means we don't need to store the entire DP array; we can just keep track of these two values.
Intuition: By using just two variables instead of an array, we can reduce the space complexity from O(n) to O(1).
In the worst case, we might have two choices at each position, leading to an exponential number of recursive calls.
The space complexity is O(n) due to the recursion stack, where n is the length of the input string.
With memoization, each position is processed at most once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We use O(n) space for the memoization array and the recursion stack.
We process each position once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the DP values.
We still process each position once, resulting in a linear time complexity.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314151617181920function numDecodings(s): // Base case: empty string has 1 way to decode if s is empty: return 1 // If the string starts with '0', it cannot be decoded if s[0] == '0': return 0 // Initialize result ways = 0 // Option 1: Take a single digit ways += numDecodings(s[1:]) // Option 2: Take two digits if valid if length of s >= 2 and (s[0] == '1' or (s[0] == '2' and s[1] <= '6')): ways += numDecodings(s[2:]) return ways
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728function numDecodings(s): memo = new Map() function decode(i): // Base case: reached the end of the string if i == length of s: return 1 // If already computed, return from memo if i in memo: return memo[i] // If current digit is '0', it cannot be decoded on its own if s[i] == '0': return 0 // Option 1: Take a single digit ways = decode(i + 1) // Option 2: Take two digits if valid if i + 1 < length of s and (s[i] == '1' or (s[i] == '2' and s[i+1] <= '6')): ways += decode(i + 2) // Store result in memo memo[i] = ways return ways return decode(0)
123456789101112131415161718192021function numDecodings(s): n = length of s dp = new array of size n+1 // Base case: empty string has 1 way to decode dp[n] = 1 // Fill dp array from right to left for i from n-1 down to 0: // If current digit is '0', it cannot be decoded on its own if s[i] == '0': dp[i] = 0 else: // Option 1: Take a single digit dp[i] = dp[i+1] // Option 2: Take two digits if valid if i+1 < n and (s[i] == '1' or (s[i] == '2' and s[i+1] <= '6')): dp[i] += dp[i+2] return dp[0]