There are 2 main approaches to solve this problem:
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming with three dimensions: the number of crimes considered, the number of members used, and the profit generated.
Let's define dp[i][j][k]
as the number of schemes when considering the first i
crimes, using exactly j
members, and generating at least k
profit.
For each crime, we have two options:
If we include the crime, we need to ensure that we have enough members to commit it. The recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k] + dp[i-1][j-group[i-1]][max(0, k-profit[i-1])]
if j >= group[i-1]
If we exclude the crime, the recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k]
The base case is dp[0][0][0] = 1
, which means there is one way to achieve 0 profit with 0 members when considering 0 crimes (by doing nothing).
The final answer is the sum of dp[m][j][minProfit]
for all j
from 0 to n
, where m
is the number of crimes.
Where m is the number of crimes, n is the number of members, and minProfit is the minimum profit required. We need to compute dp[i][j][k] for each i from 0 to m, each j from 0 to n, and each k from 0 to minProfit.
We use a 3D DP array of size (m+1) x (n+1) x (minProfit+1).
We can optimize the space complexity of the previous approach by observing that we only need the results from the previous crime to calculate the results for the current crime.
Instead of using a 3D DP array, we can use a 2D DP array dp[j][k]
to represent the number of schemes using exactly j
members and generating at least k
profit.
For each crime, we update the DP array in reverse order to avoid using the updated values in the same iteration.
The recurrence relation remains the same, but we need to be careful about the order of updates to avoid overwriting values that we still need.
Where m is the number of crimes, n is the number of members, and minProfit is the minimum profit required. We need to compute dp[j][k] for each crime, each j from 0 to n, and each k from 0 to minProfit.
We use a 2D DP array of size (n+1) x (minProfit+1).
1234567891011121314151617181920212223function profitableSchemes(n, minProfit, group, profit): m = length of group // Initialize 3D DP array dp = new 3D array of size (m+1) x (n+1) x (minProfit+1), initialized with 0 dp[0][0][0] = 1 // Base case for i from 1 to m: for j from 0 to n: for k from 0 to minProfit: // Exclude the crime dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k] // Include the crime if we have enough members if j >= group[i-1]: dp[i][j][k] += dp[i-1][j-group[i-1]][max(0, k-profit[i-1])] // Calculate the final answer result = 0 for j from 0 to n: result = (result + dp[m][j][minProfit]) % MOD return result
Understand different approaches to solve the profitable schemes problem and analyze their efficiency.
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming with three dimensions: the number of crimes considered, the number of members used, and the profit generated.
Let's define dp[i][j][k]
as the number of schemes when considering the first i
crimes, using exactly j
members, and generating at least k
profit.
For each crime, we have two options:
If we include the crime, we need to ensure that we have enough members to commit it. The recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k] + dp[i-1][j-group[i-1]][max(0, k-profit[i-1])]
if j >= group[i-1]
If we exclude the crime, the recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k]
The base case is dp[0][0][0] = 1
, which means there is one way to achieve 0 profit with 0 members when considering 0 crimes (by doing nothing).
The final answer is the sum of dp[m][j][minProfit]
for all j
from 0 to n
, where m
is the number of crimes.
We can optimize the space complexity of the previous approach by observing that we only need the results from the previous crime to calculate the results for the current crime.
Instead of using a 3D DP array, we can use a 2D DP array dp[j][k]
to represent the number of schemes using exactly j
members and generating at least k
profit.
For each crime, we update the DP array in reverse order to avoid using the updated values in the same iteration.
The recurrence relation remains the same, but we need to be careful about the order of updates to avoid overwriting values that we still need.
Where m is the number of crimes, n is the number of members, and minProfit is the minimum profit required. We need to compute dp[i][j][k] for each i from 0 to m, each j from 0 to n, and each k from 0 to minProfit.
We use a 3D DP array of size (m+1) x (n+1) x (minProfit+1).
Where m is the number of crimes, n is the number of members, and minProfit is the minimum profit required. We need to compute dp[j][k] for each crime, each j from 0 to n, and each k from 0 to minProfit.
We use a 2D DP array of size (n+1) x (minProfit+1).
1234567891011121314151617181920212223function profitableSchemes(n, minProfit, group, profit): m = length of group // Initialize 3D DP array dp = new 3D array of size (m+1) x (n+1) x (minProfit+1), initialized with 0 dp[0][0][0] = 1 // Base case for i from 1 to m: for j from 0 to n: for k from 0 to minProfit: // Exclude the crime dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k] // Include the crime if we have enough members if j >= group[i-1]: dp[i][j][k] += dp[i-1][j-group[i-1]][max(0, k-profit[i-1])] // Calculate the final answer result = 0 for j from 0 to n: result = (result + dp[m][j][minProfit]) % MOD return result
12345678910111213141516171819function profitableSchemes(n, minProfit, group, profit): m = length of group MOD = 10^9 + 7 // Initialize 2D DP array dp = new 2D array of size (n+1) x (minProfit+1), initialized with 0 dp[0][0] = 1 // Base case for i from 0 to m-1: for j from n down to group[i]: for k from minProfit down to 0: dp[j][k] = (dp[j][k] + dp[j-group[i]][max(0, k-profit[i])]) % MOD // Calculate the final answer result = 0 for j from 0 to n: result = (result + dp[j][minProfit]) % MOD return result
There are 2 main approaches to solve this problem:
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming with three dimensions: the number of crimes considered, the number of members used, and the profit generated.
Let's define dp[i][j][k]
as the number of schemes when considering the first i
crimes, using exactly j
members, and generating at least k
profit.
For each crime, we have two options:
If we include the crime, we need to ensure that we have enough members to commit it. The recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k] + dp[i-1][j-group[i-1]][max(0, k-profit[i-1])]
if j >= group[i-1]
If we exclude the crime, the recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k]
The base case is dp[0][0][0] = 1
, which means there is one way to achieve 0 profit with 0 members when considering 0 crimes (by doing nothing).
The final answer is the sum of dp[m][j][minProfit]
for all j
from 0 to n
, where m
is the number of crimes.
Where m is the number of crimes, n is the number of members, and minProfit is the minimum profit required. We need to compute dp[i][j][k] for each i from 0 to m, each j from 0 to n, and each k from 0 to minProfit.
We use a 3D DP array of size (m+1) x (n+1) x (minProfit+1).
We can optimize the space complexity of the previous approach by observing that we only need the results from the previous crime to calculate the results for the current crime.
Instead of using a 3D DP array, we can use a 2D DP array dp[j][k]
to represent the number of schemes using exactly j
members and generating at least k
profit.
For each crime, we update the DP array in reverse order to avoid using the updated values in the same iteration.
The recurrence relation remains the same, but we need to be careful about the order of updates to avoid overwriting values that we still need.
Where m is the number of crimes, n is the number of members, and minProfit is the minimum profit required. We need to compute dp[j][k] for each crime, each j from 0 to n, and each k from 0 to minProfit.
We use a 2D DP array of size (n+1) x (minProfit+1).
1234567891011121314151617181920212223function profitableSchemes(n, minProfit, group, profit): m = length of group // Initialize 3D DP array dp = new 3D array of size (m+1) x (n+1) x (minProfit+1), initialized with 0 dp[0][0][0] = 1 // Base case for i from 1 to m: for j from 0 to n: for k from 0 to minProfit: // Exclude the crime dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k] // Include the crime if we have enough members if j >= group[i-1]: dp[i][j][k] += dp[i-1][j-group[i-1]][max(0, k-profit[i-1])] // Calculate the final answer result = 0 for j from 0 to n: result = (result + dp[m][j][minProfit]) % MOD return result
Understand different approaches to solve the profitable schemes problem and analyze their efficiency.
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming with three dimensions: the number of crimes considered, the number of members used, and the profit generated.
Let's define dp[i][j][k]
as the number of schemes when considering the first i
crimes, using exactly j
members, and generating at least k
profit.
For each crime, we have two options:
If we include the crime, we need to ensure that we have enough members to commit it. The recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k] + dp[i-1][j-group[i-1]][max(0, k-profit[i-1])]
if j >= group[i-1]
If we exclude the crime, the recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k]
The base case is dp[0][0][0] = 1
, which means there is one way to achieve 0 profit with 0 members when considering 0 crimes (by doing nothing).
The final answer is the sum of dp[m][j][minProfit]
for all j
from 0 to n
, where m
is the number of crimes.
We can optimize the space complexity of the previous approach by observing that we only need the results from the previous crime to calculate the results for the current crime.
Instead of using a 3D DP array, we can use a 2D DP array dp[j][k]
to represent the number of schemes using exactly j
members and generating at least k
profit.
For each crime, we update the DP array in reverse order to avoid using the updated values in the same iteration.
The recurrence relation remains the same, but we need to be careful about the order of updates to avoid overwriting values that we still need.
Where m is the number of crimes, n is the number of members, and minProfit is the minimum profit required. We need to compute dp[i][j][k] for each i from 0 to m, each j from 0 to n, and each k from 0 to minProfit.
We use a 3D DP array of size (m+1) x (n+1) x (minProfit+1).
Where m is the number of crimes, n is the number of members, and minProfit is the minimum profit required. We need to compute dp[j][k] for each crime, each j from 0 to n, and each k from 0 to minProfit.
We use a 2D DP array of size (n+1) x (minProfit+1).
1234567891011121314151617181920212223function profitableSchemes(n, minProfit, group, profit): m = length of group // Initialize 3D DP array dp = new 3D array of size (m+1) x (n+1) x (minProfit+1), initialized with 0 dp[0][0][0] = 1 // Base case for i from 1 to m: for j from 0 to n: for k from 0 to minProfit: // Exclude the crime dp[i][j][k] = dp[i-1][j][k] // Include the crime if we have enough members if j >= group[i-1]: dp[i][j][k] += dp[i-1][j-group[i-1]][max(0, k-profit[i-1])] // Calculate the final answer result = 0 for j from 0 to n: result = (result + dp[m][j][minProfit]) % MOD return result
12345678910111213141516171819function profitableSchemes(n, minProfit, group, profit): m = length of group MOD = 10^9 + 7 // Initialize 2D DP array dp = new 2D array of size (n+1) x (minProfit+1), initialized with 0 dp[0][0] = 1 // Base case for i from 0 to m-1: for j from n down to group[i]: for k from minProfit down to 0: dp[j][k] = (dp[j][k] + dp[j-group[i]][max(0, k-profit[i])]) % MOD // Calculate the final answer result = 0 for j from 0 to n: result = (result + dp[j][minProfit]) % MOD return result