There are 4 main approaches to solve this problem:
Let's start by understanding the problem from first principles. We need to count the number of structurally unique BSTs that can be formed with n nodes.
Thinking Process: For a BST with nodes 1 to n, we can choose any number i (1 ≤ i ≤ n) as the root. Once we choose i as the root:
The key insight is that the structure of a BST is determined by the relative order of nodes, not their absolute values. So, the number of unique BSTs with nodes 1 to i-1 is the same as the number of unique BSTs with i-1 nodes. Similarly, the number of unique BSTs with nodes i+1 to n is the same as the number of unique BSTs with n-i nodes.
Intuition: We can use recursion to solve this problem. For each possible root value i, we multiply the number of possible left subtrees by the number of possible right subtrees. Then, we sum these products for all possible root values.
The time complexity is exponential due to the repeated calculations in the recursive approach. The exact formula is related to the Catalan number's recurrence relation.
The space complexity is O(n) due to the recursion stack, which can go as deep as n levels.
The recursive approach works but is inefficient due to overlapping subproblems. We can optimize it using memoization.
Thinking Process: We notice that we're calculating the same values multiple times in the recursive approach. For example, numTrees(2) might be calculated multiple times for different root values.
To avoid this redundancy, we can use memoization to store the results of subproblems we've already solved. This way, when we encounter the same subproblem again, we can simply look up the result instead of recalculating it.
Intuition: Memoization transforms our exponential solution into a polynomial one by eliminating redundant calculations.
With memoization, each value of n is computed at most once, and for each n, we iterate through n possible root values, resulting in O(n^2) time complexity.
We use O(n) space for the memoization array and the recursion stack.
We can further optimize our solution by using a bottom-up dynamic programming approach, which eliminates the need for recursion.
Thinking Process: Instead of starting from n and breaking it down into smaller subproblems (top-down), we can start from the smallest subproblems and build our way up to n (bottom-up).
Let's define dp[i] as the number of unique BSTs with i nodes. The base case is dp[0] = dp[1] = 1, representing an empty tree and a single node tree, respectively.
For dp[i], we need to consider all possible root values from 1 to i. For each root value j, the left subtree contains j-1 nodes, and the right subtree contains i-j nodes. The number of unique BSTs with root j is dp[j-1] * dp[i-j].
Intuition: By building our solution from smaller subproblems to larger ones, we can avoid recursion and its associated overhead.
We have two nested loops: the outer loop runs n times, and the inner loop runs at most n times, resulting in O(n^2) time complexity.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the DP values.
The number of unique BSTs with n nodes is actually the nth Catalan number, which has a direct mathematical formula.
Thinking Process: The Catalan numbers are a sequence of positive integers that appear in various counting problems, often involving recursively defined objects.
The nth Catalan number can be calculated using the formula:
C(n) = (2n)! / (n! * (n+1)!)
Alternatively, it can be calculated using the formula:
C(n) = C(n-1) * (4n - 2) / (n + 1)
Intuition: By recognizing that this problem is related to Catalan numbers, we can use the mathematical formula to calculate the answer directly, without using dynamic programming.
We perform a single loop from 1 to n, with constant-time operations in each iteration.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011function numTrees(n): if n = 0 or n = 1: return 1 total = 0 for i from 1 to n: leftTrees = numTrees(i - 1) rightTrees = numTrees(n - i) total += leftTrees * rightTrees return total
Understand different approaches to solve the tree structure counter problem and analyze their efficiency.
Let's start by understanding the problem from first principles. We need to count the number of structurally unique BSTs that can be formed with n nodes.
Thinking Process: For a BST with nodes 1 to n, we can choose any number i (1 ≤ i ≤ n) as the root. Once we choose i as the root:
The key insight is that the structure of a BST is determined by the relative order of nodes, not their absolute values. So, the number of unique BSTs with nodes 1 to i-1 is the same as the number of unique BSTs with i-1 nodes. Similarly, the number of unique BSTs with nodes i+1 to n is the same as the number of unique BSTs with n-i nodes.
Intuition: We can use recursion to solve this problem. For each possible root value i, we multiply the number of possible left subtrees by the number of possible right subtrees. Then, we sum these products for all possible root values.
The recursive approach works but is inefficient due to overlapping subproblems. We can optimize it using memoization.
Thinking Process: We notice that we're calculating the same values multiple times in the recursive approach. For example, numTrees(2) might be calculated multiple times for different root values.
To avoid this redundancy, we can use memoization to store the results of subproblems we've already solved. This way, when we encounter the same subproblem again, we can simply look up the result instead of recalculating it.
Intuition: Memoization transforms our exponential solution into a polynomial one by eliminating redundant calculations.
We can further optimize our solution by using a bottom-up dynamic programming approach, which eliminates the need for recursion.
Thinking Process: Instead of starting from n and breaking it down into smaller subproblems (top-down), we can start from the smallest subproblems and build our way up to n (bottom-up).
Let's define dp[i] as the number of unique BSTs with i nodes. The base case is dp[0] = dp[1] = 1, representing an empty tree and a single node tree, respectively.
For dp[i], we need to consider all possible root values from 1 to i. For each root value j, the left subtree contains j-1 nodes, and the right subtree contains i-j nodes. The number of unique BSTs with root j is dp[j-1] * dp[i-j].
Intuition: By building our solution from smaller subproblems to larger ones, we can avoid recursion and its associated overhead.
The number of unique BSTs with n nodes is actually the nth Catalan number, which has a direct mathematical formula.
Thinking Process: The Catalan numbers are a sequence of positive integers that appear in various counting problems, often involving recursively defined objects.
The nth Catalan number can be calculated using the formula:
C(n) = (2n)! / (n! * (n+1)!)
Alternatively, it can be calculated using the formula:
C(n) = C(n-1) * (4n - 2) / (n + 1)
Intuition: By recognizing that this problem is related to Catalan numbers, we can use the mathematical formula to calculate the answer directly, without using dynamic programming.
The time complexity is exponential due to the repeated calculations in the recursive approach. The exact formula is related to the Catalan number's recurrence relation.
The space complexity is O(n) due to the recursion stack, which can go as deep as n levels.
With memoization, each value of n is computed at most once, and for each n, we iterate through n possible root values, resulting in O(n^2) time complexity.
We use O(n) space for the memoization array and the recursion stack.
We have two nested loops: the outer loop runs n times, and the inner loop runs at most n times, resulting in O(n^2) time complexity.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the DP values.
We perform a single loop from 1 to n, with constant-time operations in each iteration.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011function numTrees(n): if n = 0 or n = 1: return 1 total = 0 for i from 1 to n: leftTrees = numTrees(i - 1) rightTrees = numTrees(n - i) total += leftTrees * rightTrees return total
1234567891011121314151617181920function numTrees(n): memo = new array or map function calculate(n): if n in memo: return memo[n] if n = 0 or n = 1: return 1 total = 0 for i from 1 to n: leftTrees = calculate(i - 1) rightTrees = calculate(n - i) total += leftTrees * rightTrees memo[n] = total return total return calculate(n)
1234567891011function numTrees(n): dp = new array of size n+1 dp[0] = 1 dp[1] = 1 for i from 2 to n: dp[i] = 0 for j from 1 to i: dp[i] += dp[j-1] * dp[i-j] return dp[n]
There are 4 main approaches to solve this problem:
Let's start by understanding the problem from first principles. We need to count the number of structurally unique BSTs that can be formed with n nodes.
Thinking Process: For a BST with nodes 1 to n, we can choose any number i (1 ≤ i ≤ n) as the root. Once we choose i as the root:
The key insight is that the structure of a BST is determined by the relative order of nodes, not their absolute values. So, the number of unique BSTs with nodes 1 to i-1 is the same as the number of unique BSTs with i-1 nodes. Similarly, the number of unique BSTs with nodes i+1 to n is the same as the number of unique BSTs with n-i nodes.
Intuition: We can use recursion to solve this problem. For each possible root value i, we multiply the number of possible left subtrees by the number of possible right subtrees. Then, we sum these products for all possible root values.
The time complexity is exponential due to the repeated calculations in the recursive approach. The exact formula is related to the Catalan number's recurrence relation.
The space complexity is O(n) due to the recursion stack, which can go as deep as n levels.
The recursive approach works but is inefficient due to overlapping subproblems. We can optimize it using memoization.
Thinking Process: We notice that we're calculating the same values multiple times in the recursive approach. For example, numTrees(2) might be calculated multiple times for different root values.
To avoid this redundancy, we can use memoization to store the results of subproblems we've already solved. This way, when we encounter the same subproblem again, we can simply look up the result instead of recalculating it.
Intuition: Memoization transforms our exponential solution into a polynomial one by eliminating redundant calculations.
With memoization, each value of n is computed at most once, and for each n, we iterate through n possible root values, resulting in O(n^2) time complexity.
We use O(n) space for the memoization array and the recursion stack.
We can further optimize our solution by using a bottom-up dynamic programming approach, which eliminates the need for recursion.
Thinking Process: Instead of starting from n and breaking it down into smaller subproblems (top-down), we can start from the smallest subproblems and build our way up to n (bottom-up).
Let's define dp[i] as the number of unique BSTs with i nodes. The base case is dp[0] = dp[1] = 1, representing an empty tree and a single node tree, respectively.
For dp[i], we need to consider all possible root values from 1 to i. For each root value j, the left subtree contains j-1 nodes, and the right subtree contains i-j nodes. The number of unique BSTs with root j is dp[j-1] * dp[i-j].
Intuition: By building our solution from smaller subproblems to larger ones, we can avoid recursion and its associated overhead.
We have two nested loops: the outer loop runs n times, and the inner loop runs at most n times, resulting in O(n^2) time complexity.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the DP values.
The number of unique BSTs with n nodes is actually the nth Catalan number, which has a direct mathematical formula.
Thinking Process: The Catalan numbers are a sequence of positive integers that appear in various counting problems, often involving recursively defined objects.
The nth Catalan number can be calculated using the formula:
C(n) = (2n)! / (n! * (n+1)!)
Alternatively, it can be calculated using the formula:
C(n) = C(n-1) * (4n - 2) / (n + 1)
Intuition: By recognizing that this problem is related to Catalan numbers, we can use the mathematical formula to calculate the answer directly, without using dynamic programming.
We perform a single loop from 1 to n, with constant-time operations in each iteration.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011function numTrees(n): if n = 0 or n = 1: return 1 total = 0 for i from 1 to n: leftTrees = numTrees(i - 1) rightTrees = numTrees(n - i) total += leftTrees * rightTrees return total
Understand different approaches to solve the tree structure counter problem and analyze their efficiency.
Let's start by understanding the problem from first principles. We need to count the number of structurally unique BSTs that can be formed with n nodes.
Thinking Process: For a BST with nodes 1 to n, we can choose any number i (1 ≤ i ≤ n) as the root. Once we choose i as the root:
The key insight is that the structure of a BST is determined by the relative order of nodes, not their absolute values. So, the number of unique BSTs with nodes 1 to i-1 is the same as the number of unique BSTs with i-1 nodes. Similarly, the number of unique BSTs with nodes i+1 to n is the same as the number of unique BSTs with n-i nodes.
Intuition: We can use recursion to solve this problem. For each possible root value i, we multiply the number of possible left subtrees by the number of possible right subtrees. Then, we sum these products for all possible root values.
The recursive approach works but is inefficient due to overlapping subproblems. We can optimize it using memoization.
Thinking Process: We notice that we're calculating the same values multiple times in the recursive approach. For example, numTrees(2) might be calculated multiple times for different root values.
To avoid this redundancy, we can use memoization to store the results of subproblems we've already solved. This way, when we encounter the same subproblem again, we can simply look up the result instead of recalculating it.
Intuition: Memoization transforms our exponential solution into a polynomial one by eliminating redundant calculations.
We can further optimize our solution by using a bottom-up dynamic programming approach, which eliminates the need for recursion.
Thinking Process: Instead of starting from n and breaking it down into smaller subproblems (top-down), we can start from the smallest subproblems and build our way up to n (bottom-up).
Let's define dp[i] as the number of unique BSTs with i nodes. The base case is dp[0] = dp[1] = 1, representing an empty tree and a single node tree, respectively.
For dp[i], we need to consider all possible root values from 1 to i. For each root value j, the left subtree contains j-1 nodes, and the right subtree contains i-j nodes. The number of unique BSTs with root j is dp[j-1] * dp[i-j].
Intuition: By building our solution from smaller subproblems to larger ones, we can avoid recursion and its associated overhead.
The number of unique BSTs with n nodes is actually the nth Catalan number, which has a direct mathematical formula.
Thinking Process: The Catalan numbers are a sequence of positive integers that appear in various counting problems, often involving recursively defined objects.
The nth Catalan number can be calculated using the formula:
C(n) = (2n)! / (n! * (n+1)!)
Alternatively, it can be calculated using the formula:
C(n) = C(n-1) * (4n - 2) / (n + 1)
Intuition: By recognizing that this problem is related to Catalan numbers, we can use the mathematical formula to calculate the answer directly, without using dynamic programming.
The time complexity is exponential due to the repeated calculations in the recursive approach. The exact formula is related to the Catalan number's recurrence relation.
The space complexity is O(n) due to the recursion stack, which can go as deep as n levels.
With memoization, each value of n is computed at most once, and for each n, we iterate through n possible root values, resulting in O(n^2) time complexity.
We use O(n) space for the memoization array and the recursion stack.
We have two nested loops: the outer loop runs n times, and the inner loop runs at most n times, resulting in O(n^2) time complexity.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the DP values.
We perform a single loop from 1 to n, with constant-time operations in each iteration.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011function numTrees(n): if n = 0 or n = 1: return 1 total = 0 for i from 1 to n: leftTrees = numTrees(i - 1) rightTrees = numTrees(n - i) total += leftTrees * rightTrees return total
1234567891011121314151617181920function numTrees(n): memo = new array or map function calculate(n): if n in memo: return memo[n] if n = 0 or n = 1: return 1 total = 0 for i from 1 to n: leftTrees = calculate(i - 1) rightTrees = calculate(n - i) total += leftTrees * rightTrees memo[n] = total return total return calculate(n)
1234567891011function numTrees(n): dp = new array of size n+1 dp[0] = 1 dp[1] = 1 for i from 2 to n: dp[i] = 0 for j from 1 to i: dp[i] += dp[j-1] * dp[i-j] return dp[n]