There are 3 main approaches to solve this problem:
The stack-based approach uses a stack to keep track of the indices of unmatched parentheses. We push the index of each opening parenthesis onto the stack. When we encounter a closing parenthesis, we pop the stack if it's not empty (matching an opening parenthesis), and then calculate the length of the valid substring.
The key insight is to push -1 onto the stack initially to serve as a base for calculating the length of valid substrings.
Where n is the length of the string. We iterate through the string once, and each character is pushed and popped from the stack at most once.
In the worst case, the stack can contain all opening parentheses, which could be up to n/2 elements.
The dynamic programming approach builds up the solution by considering one character at a time. We use an array dp where dp[i] represents the length of the longest valid substring ending at index i.
The key insight is to use the previously computed values to determine the current value, considering different cases based on the current and previous characters.
Where n is the length of the string. We iterate through the string once, and each calculation takes constant time.
We use a DP array of the same length as the input string.
The two-pass approach scans the string twice, once from left to right and once from right to left, using two counters to keep track of the number of opening and closing parentheses.
The key insight is that when the counters are equal, we have a valid substring, and when a counter becomes negative, we reset it to zero.
Where n is the length of the string. We scan the string twice, each scan taking O(n) time.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314151617function longestValidParentheses(s): n = length of s stack = empty stack stack.push(-1) // Base for calculating lengths maxLength = 0 for i from 0 to n-1: if s[i] == '(': stack.push(i) else: // s[i] == ')' stack.pop() if stack is empty: stack.push(i) // New base else: maxLength = max(maxLength, i - stack.top()) return maxLength
Understand different approaches to solve the parentheses validator problem and analyze their efficiency.
The stack-based approach uses a stack to keep track of the indices of unmatched parentheses. We push the index of each opening parenthesis onto the stack. When we encounter a closing parenthesis, we pop the stack if it's not empty (matching an opening parenthesis), and then calculate the length of the valid substring.
The key insight is to push -1 onto the stack initially to serve as a base for calculating the length of valid substrings.
The dynamic programming approach builds up the solution by considering one character at a time. We use an array dp where dp[i] represents the length of the longest valid substring ending at index i.
The key insight is to use the previously computed values to determine the current value, considering different cases based on the current and previous characters.
The two-pass approach scans the string twice, once from left to right and once from right to left, using two counters to keep track of the number of opening and closing parentheses.
The key insight is that when the counters are equal, we have a valid substring, and when a counter becomes negative, we reset it to zero.
Where n is the length of the string. We iterate through the string once, and each character is pushed and popped from the stack at most once.
In the worst case, the stack can contain all opening parentheses, which could be up to n/2 elements.
Where n is the length of the string. We iterate through the string once, and each calculation takes constant time.
We use a DP array of the same length as the input string.
Where n is the length of the string. We scan the string twice, each scan taking O(n) time.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314151617function longestValidParentheses(s): n = length of s stack = empty stack stack.push(-1) // Base for calculating lengths maxLength = 0 for i from 0 to n-1: if s[i] == '(': stack.push(i) else: // s[i] == ')' stack.pop() if stack is empty: stack.push(i) // New base else: maxLength = max(maxLength, i - stack.top()) return maxLength
1234567891011121314151617function longestValidParentheses(s): n = length of s dp = array of size n, initialized with 0s maxLength = 0 for i from 1 to n-1: if s[i] == ')': if s[i-1] == '(': // Case: "()" dp[i] = (dp[i-2] if i >= 2 else 0) + 2 else if i - dp[i-1] > 0 and s[i - dp[i-1] - 1] == '(': // Case: "))" where there's a matching "(" for the first ")" dp[i] = dp[i-1] + 2 + (dp[i - dp[i-1] - 2] if i - dp[i-1] >= 2 else 0) maxLength = max(maxLength, dp[i]) return maxLength
There are 3 main approaches to solve this problem:
The stack-based approach uses a stack to keep track of the indices of unmatched parentheses. We push the index of each opening parenthesis onto the stack. When we encounter a closing parenthesis, we pop the stack if it's not empty (matching an opening parenthesis), and then calculate the length of the valid substring.
The key insight is to push -1 onto the stack initially to serve as a base for calculating the length of valid substrings.
Where n is the length of the string. We iterate through the string once, and each character is pushed and popped from the stack at most once.
In the worst case, the stack can contain all opening parentheses, which could be up to n/2 elements.
The dynamic programming approach builds up the solution by considering one character at a time. We use an array dp where dp[i] represents the length of the longest valid substring ending at index i.
The key insight is to use the previously computed values to determine the current value, considering different cases based on the current and previous characters.
Where n is the length of the string. We iterate through the string once, and each calculation takes constant time.
We use a DP array of the same length as the input string.
The two-pass approach scans the string twice, once from left to right and once from right to left, using two counters to keep track of the number of opening and closing parentheses.
The key insight is that when the counters are equal, we have a valid substring, and when a counter becomes negative, we reset it to zero.
Where n is the length of the string. We scan the string twice, each scan taking O(n) time.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314151617function longestValidParentheses(s): n = length of s stack = empty stack stack.push(-1) // Base for calculating lengths maxLength = 0 for i from 0 to n-1: if s[i] == '(': stack.push(i) else: // s[i] == ')' stack.pop() if stack is empty: stack.push(i) // New base else: maxLength = max(maxLength, i - stack.top()) return maxLength
Understand different approaches to solve the parentheses validator problem and analyze their efficiency.
The stack-based approach uses a stack to keep track of the indices of unmatched parentheses. We push the index of each opening parenthesis onto the stack. When we encounter a closing parenthesis, we pop the stack if it's not empty (matching an opening parenthesis), and then calculate the length of the valid substring.
The key insight is to push -1 onto the stack initially to serve as a base for calculating the length of valid substrings.
The dynamic programming approach builds up the solution by considering one character at a time. We use an array dp where dp[i] represents the length of the longest valid substring ending at index i.
The key insight is to use the previously computed values to determine the current value, considering different cases based on the current and previous characters.
The two-pass approach scans the string twice, once from left to right and once from right to left, using two counters to keep track of the number of opening and closing parentheses.
The key insight is that when the counters are equal, we have a valid substring, and when a counter becomes negative, we reset it to zero.
Where n is the length of the string. We iterate through the string once, and each character is pushed and popped from the stack at most once.
In the worst case, the stack can contain all opening parentheses, which could be up to n/2 elements.
Where n is the length of the string. We iterate through the string once, and each calculation takes constant time.
We use a DP array of the same length as the input string.
Where n is the length of the string. We scan the string twice, each scan taking O(n) time.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
1234567891011121314151617function longestValidParentheses(s): n = length of s stack = empty stack stack.push(-1) // Base for calculating lengths maxLength = 0 for i from 0 to n-1: if s[i] == '(': stack.push(i) else: // s[i] == ')' stack.pop() if stack is empty: stack.push(i) // New base else: maxLength = max(maxLength, i - stack.top()) return maxLength
1234567891011121314151617function longestValidParentheses(s): n = length of s dp = array of size n, initialized with 0s maxLength = 0 for i from 1 to n-1: if s[i] == ')': if s[i-1] == '(': // Case: "()" dp[i] = (dp[i-2] if i >= 2 else 0) + 2 else if i - dp[i-1] > 0 and s[i - dp[i-1] - 1] == '(': // Case: "))" where there's a matching "(" for the first ")" dp[i] = dp[i-1] + 2 + (dp[i - dp[i-1] - 2] if i - dp[i-1] >= 2 else 0) maxLength = max(maxLength, dp[i]) return maxLength