You're a bioinformatics researcher analyzing DNA sequences. You have a source sequence S and a target sequence T, and you need to determine how many distinct ways you can extract the target sequence from the source sequence.
A subsequence is formed by removing some characters from the original string without changing the order of the remaining characters. For example, "ACE" is a subsequence of "ABCDE", while "AEC" is not.
Your task is to count the number of distinct subsequences of S that are equal to T.
For example, if S = "AAGCTAGCT" and T = "AGT", you need to find how many different ways you can extract "AGT" from "AAGCTAGCT" by deleting some characters.
Input: S = "rabbbit", T = "rabbit"
Output: 3
Explanation: There are 3 ways to extract "rabbit" from "rabbbit":
1. ra(b)bbit → rabbit (remove the 1st 'b')
2. rab(b)bit → rabbit (remove the 2nd 'b')
3. rabb(b)it → rabbit (remove the 3rd 'b')
Input: S = "babgbag", T = "bag"
Output: 5
Explanation: There are 5 ways to extract "bag" from "babgbag":
1. (ba)bgbag → bag (use 1st 'b', 1st 'a', 1st 'g')
2. (ba)bgba(g) → bag (use 1st 'b', 1st 'a', 2nd 'g')
3. (b)abgb(ag) → bag (use 1st 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g')
4. ba(b)gb(ag) → bag (use 2nd 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g')
5. babg(bag) → bag (use 3rd 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g')
To solve this problem, we need to:
Apply string manipulation concepts to solve a real-world problem.
You're a bioinformatics researcher analyzing DNA sequences. You have a source sequence S and a target sequence T, and you need to determine how many distinct ways you can extract the target sequence from the source sequence.
A subsequence is formed by removing some characters from the original string without changing the order of the remaining characters. For example, "ACE" is a subsequence of "ABCDE", while "AEC" is not.
Your task is to count the number of distinct subsequences of S that are equal to T.
For example, if S = "AAGCTAGCT" and T = "AGT", you need to find how many different ways you can extract "AGT" from "AAGCTAGCT" by deleting some characters.
There are 3 ways to extract "rabbit" from "rabbbit": 1. ra(b)bbit → rabbit (remove the 1st 'b') 2. rab(b)bit → rabbit (remove the 2nd 'b') 3. rabb(b)it → rabbit (remove the 3rd 'b')
There are 5 ways to extract "bag" from "babgbag": 1. (ba)bgbag → bag (use 1st 'b', 1st 'a', 1st 'g') 2. (ba)bgba(g) → bag (use 1st 'b', 1st 'a', 2nd 'g') 3. (b)abgb(ag) → bag (use 1st 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g') 4. ba(b)gb(ag) → bag (use 2nd 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g') 5. babg(bag) → bag (use 3rd 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g')
The order of characters matters in subsequences
We need to count all possible ways to form T from S by deleting characters
This problem has optimal substructure, making it suitable for dynamic programming
When we encounter a matching character, we have two choices: use it or skip it
The total number of ways is the sum of ways from all valid choices
We can build our solution incrementally by considering one character at a time
This problem has several practical applications:
Analyzing DNA sequences and finding patterns in genetic data.
Searching for patterns in text documents while allowing for variations.
Implementing fuzzy search algorithms in database systems.
Analyzing text patterns and relationships between words in different contexts.
You're a bioinformatics researcher analyzing DNA sequences. You have a source sequence S and a target sequence T, and you need to determine how many distinct ways you can extract the target sequence from the source sequence.
A subsequence is formed by removing some characters from the original string without changing the order of the remaining characters. For example, "ACE" is a subsequence of "ABCDE", while "AEC" is not.
Your task is to count the number of distinct subsequences of S that are equal to T.
For example, if S = "AAGCTAGCT" and T = "AGT", you need to find how many different ways you can extract "AGT" from "AAGCTAGCT" by deleting some characters.
Input: S = "rabbbit", T = "rabbit"
Output: 3
Explanation: There are 3 ways to extract "rabbit" from "rabbbit":
1. ra(b)bbit → rabbit (remove the 1st 'b')
2. rab(b)bit → rabbit (remove the 2nd 'b')
3. rabb(b)it → rabbit (remove the 3rd 'b')
Input: S = "babgbag", T = "bag"
Output: 5
Explanation: There are 5 ways to extract "bag" from "babgbag":
1. (ba)bgbag → bag (use 1st 'b', 1st 'a', 1st 'g')
2. (ba)bgba(g) → bag (use 1st 'b', 1st 'a', 2nd 'g')
3. (b)abgb(ag) → bag (use 1st 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g')
4. ba(b)gb(ag) → bag (use 2nd 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g')
5. babg(bag) → bag (use 3rd 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g')
To solve this problem, we need to:
Apply string manipulation concepts to solve a real-world problem.
You're a bioinformatics researcher analyzing DNA sequences. You have a source sequence S and a target sequence T, and you need to determine how many distinct ways you can extract the target sequence from the source sequence.
A subsequence is formed by removing some characters from the original string without changing the order of the remaining characters. For example, "ACE" is a subsequence of "ABCDE", while "AEC" is not.
Your task is to count the number of distinct subsequences of S that are equal to T.
For example, if S = "AAGCTAGCT" and T = "AGT", you need to find how many different ways you can extract "AGT" from "AAGCTAGCT" by deleting some characters.
There are 3 ways to extract "rabbit" from "rabbbit": 1. ra(b)bbit → rabbit (remove the 1st 'b') 2. rab(b)bit → rabbit (remove the 2nd 'b') 3. rabb(b)it → rabbit (remove the 3rd 'b')
There are 5 ways to extract "bag" from "babgbag": 1. (ba)bgbag → bag (use 1st 'b', 1st 'a', 1st 'g') 2. (ba)bgba(g) → bag (use 1st 'b', 1st 'a', 2nd 'g') 3. (b)abgb(ag) → bag (use 1st 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g') 4. ba(b)gb(ag) → bag (use 2nd 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g') 5. babg(bag) → bag (use 3rd 'b', 2nd 'a', 2nd 'g')
The order of characters matters in subsequences
We need to count all possible ways to form T from S by deleting characters
This problem has optimal substructure, making it suitable for dynamic programming
When we encounter a matching character, we have two choices: use it or skip it
The total number of ways is the sum of ways from all valid choices
We can build our solution incrementally by considering one character at a time
This problem has several practical applications:
Analyzing DNA sequences and finding patterns in genetic data.
Searching for patterns in text documents while allowing for variations.
Implementing fuzzy search algorithms in database systems.
Analyzing text patterns and relationships between words in different contexts.