There are 3 main approaches to solve this problem:
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to build up the solution from smaller subproblems.
Let's define dp[i][j]
as the number of ways to be at position j
after i
steps.
For each step i
and position j
, we can consider three possible moves:
j
: dp[i-1][j]
waysj+1
: dp[i-1][j+1]
waysj-1
: dp[i-1][j-1]
waysTherefore, the recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j] + dp[i-1][j-1] + dp[i-1][j+1]
We need to be careful about the boundary conditions:
j-1 < 0
, then dp[i-1][j-1] = 0
(can't move right from a negative position)j+1 >= arrLen
, then dp[i-1][j+1] = 0
(can't move left from a position outside the array)The base case is dp[0][0] = 1
, as there is one way to be at position 0 after 0 steps.
The final answer is dp[steps][0]
, which represents the number of ways to be at position 0 after steps
steps.
An important optimization is to observe that we only need to consider positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps)
, as we can't go further than steps
positions away from the starting point. This is because each step can move us at most 1 position, so after steps
steps, we can be at most steps
positions away from the starting point.
We need to fill in the DP table of size (steps + 1) × (min(arrLen, steps) + 1), and each cell takes constant time to compute.
We use a 2D DP array of size (steps + 1) × (min(arrLen, steps) + 1) to store the number of ways for each step and position.
We can optimize the space complexity of the dynamic programming approach by using a 1D array instead of a 2D array.
The key observation is that when we're calculating dp[i][j]
, we only need the values from the previous step dp[i-1][...]
. So, we can use two 1D arrays, curr
and prev
, to store the current and previous steps' values, respectively.
The recurrence relation remains the same:
curr[j] = prev[j] + prev[j-1] + prev[j+1]
After each step, we swap curr
and prev
to prepare for the next step.
This approach reduces the space complexity from O(steps * min(arrLen, steps))
to O(min(arrLen, steps))
, while maintaining the same time complexity.
We still need to process each step and position, which takes O(steps * min(arrLen, steps)) time.
We only use two 1D arrays of size min(arrLen, steps) + 1 to store the number of ways for the current and previous steps.
We can further optimize the solution by observing that we don't need to consider all positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps)
. In fact, we only need to consider positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps/2)
.
This is because to return to position 0 after steps
steps, we can go at most steps/2
positions away from the starting point. If we go further, we won't have enough steps to return to position 0.
For example, if steps = 10
, we can go at most 5 positions away from the starting point (position 0), because we need 5 steps to go there and 5 steps to return.
This optimization further reduces the time and space complexity from O(steps * min(arrLen, steps))
to O(steps * min(arrLen, steps/2))
.
We only need to process positions up to min(arrLen, steps/2), which reduces the time complexity.
We only use two 1D arrays of size min(arrLen, steps/2) + 1 to store the number of ways for the current and previous steps.
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425function numWays(steps, arrLen): // Define the maximum position we need to consider maxPosition = min(arrLen - 1, steps) // Initialize DP array dp = new 2D array of size (steps + 1) × (maxPosition + 1), initialized with 0 // Base case dp[0][0] = 1 // Fill DP array for i from 1 to steps: for j from 0 to maxPosition: // Stay at position j dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j] // Move right from position j-1 if j {'>'} 0: dp[i][j] = (dp[i][j] + dp[i-1][j-1]) % MOD // Move left from position j+1 if j {'<'} maxPosition: dp[i][j] = (dp[i][j] + dp[i-1][j+1]) % MOD return dp[steps][0]
Understand different approaches to solve the number of ways to stay in the same place after some steps problem and analyze their efficiency.
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to build up the solution from smaller subproblems.
Let's define dp[i][j]
as the number of ways to be at position j
after i
steps.
For each step i
and position j
, we can consider three possible moves:
j
: dp[i-1][j]
waysj+1
: dp[i-1][j+1]
waysj-1
: dp[i-1][j-1]
waysTherefore, the recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j] + dp[i-1][j-1] + dp[i-1][j+1]
We need to be careful about the boundary conditions:
j-1 < 0
, then dp[i-1][j-1] = 0
(can't move right from a negative position)j+1 >= arrLen
, then dp[i-1][j+1] = 0
(can't move left from a position outside the array)The base case is dp[0][0] = 1
, as there is one way to be at position 0 after 0 steps.
The final answer is dp[steps][0]
, which represents the number of ways to be at position 0 after steps
steps.
An important optimization is to observe that we only need to consider positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps)
, as we can't go further than steps
positions away from the starting point. This is because each step can move us at most 1 position, so after steps
steps, we can be at most steps
positions away from the starting point.
We can optimize the space complexity of the dynamic programming approach by using a 1D array instead of a 2D array.
The key observation is that when we're calculating dp[i][j]
, we only need the values from the previous step dp[i-1][...]
. So, we can use two 1D arrays, curr
and prev
, to store the current and previous steps' values, respectively.
The recurrence relation remains the same:
curr[j] = prev[j] + prev[j-1] + prev[j+1]
After each step, we swap curr
and prev
to prepare for the next step.
This approach reduces the space complexity from O(steps * min(arrLen, steps))
to O(min(arrLen, steps))
, while maintaining the same time complexity.
We can further optimize the solution by observing that we don't need to consider all positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps)
. In fact, we only need to consider positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps/2)
.
This is because to return to position 0 after steps
steps, we can go at most steps/2
positions away from the starting point. If we go further, we won't have enough steps to return to position 0.
For example, if steps = 10
, we can go at most 5 positions away from the starting point (position 0), because we need 5 steps to go there and 5 steps to return.
This optimization further reduces the time and space complexity from O(steps * min(arrLen, steps))
to O(steps * min(arrLen, steps/2))
.
We need to fill in the DP table of size (steps + 1) × (min(arrLen, steps) + 1), and each cell takes constant time to compute.
We use a 2D DP array of size (steps + 1) × (min(arrLen, steps) + 1) to store the number of ways for each step and position.
We still need to process each step and position, which takes O(steps * min(arrLen, steps)) time.
We only use two 1D arrays of size min(arrLen, steps) + 1 to store the number of ways for the current and previous steps.
We only need to process positions up to min(arrLen, steps/2), which reduces the time complexity.
We only use two 1D arrays of size min(arrLen, steps/2) + 1 to store the number of ways for the current and previous steps.
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425function numWays(steps, arrLen): // Define the maximum position we need to consider maxPosition = min(arrLen - 1, steps) // Initialize DP array dp = new 2D array of size (steps + 1) × (maxPosition + 1), initialized with 0 // Base case dp[0][0] = 1 // Fill DP array for i from 1 to steps: for j from 0 to maxPosition: // Stay at position j dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j] // Move right from position j-1 if j {'>'} 0: dp[i][j] = (dp[i][j] + dp[i-1][j-1]) % MOD // Move left from position j+1 if j {'<'} maxPosition: dp[i][j] = (dp[i][j] + dp[i-1][j+1]) % MOD return dp[steps][0]
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132function numWays(steps, arrLen): // Define the maximum position we need to consider maxPosition = min(arrLen - 1, steps) // Initialize arrays for previous and current steps prev = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 // Base case prev[0] = 1 // Fill arrays for i from 1 to steps: // Reset current array curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 for j from 0 to maxPosition: // Stay at position j curr[j] = prev[j] // Move right from position j-1 if j {'>'} 0: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j-1]) % MOD // Move left from position j+1 if j {'<'} maxPosition: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j+1]) % MOD // Swap arrays for next step prev = curr return prev[0]
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132function numWays(steps, arrLen): // Define the maximum position we need to consider maxPosition = min(arrLen - 1, steps / 2) // Initialize arrays for previous and current steps prev = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 // Base case prev[0] = 1 // Fill arrays for i from 1 to steps: // Reset current array curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 for j from 0 to maxPosition: // Stay at position j curr[j] = prev[j] // Move right from position j-1 if j {'>'} 0: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j-1]) % MOD // Move left from position j+1 if j {'<'} maxPosition: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j+1]) % MOD // Swap arrays for next step prev = curr return prev[0]
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132function numWays(steps, arrLen): // Define the maximum position we need to consider maxPosition = min(arrLen - 1, steps / 2) // Initialize arrays for previous and current steps prev = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 // Base case prev[0] = 1 // Fill arrays for i from 1 to steps: // Reset current array curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 for j from 0 to maxPosition: // Stay at position j curr[j] = prev[j] // Move right from position j-1 if j {'>'} 0: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j-1]) % MOD // Move left from position j+1 if j {'<'} maxPosition: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j+1]) % MOD // Swap arrays for next step prev = curr return prev[0]
There are 3 main approaches to solve this problem:
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to build up the solution from smaller subproblems.
Let's define dp[i][j]
as the number of ways to be at position j
after i
steps.
For each step i
and position j
, we can consider three possible moves:
j
: dp[i-1][j]
waysj+1
: dp[i-1][j+1]
waysj-1
: dp[i-1][j-1]
waysTherefore, the recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j] + dp[i-1][j-1] + dp[i-1][j+1]
We need to be careful about the boundary conditions:
j-1 < 0
, then dp[i-1][j-1] = 0
(can't move right from a negative position)j+1 >= arrLen
, then dp[i-1][j+1] = 0
(can't move left from a position outside the array)The base case is dp[0][0] = 1
, as there is one way to be at position 0 after 0 steps.
The final answer is dp[steps][0]
, which represents the number of ways to be at position 0 after steps
steps.
An important optimization is to observe that we only need to consider positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps)
, as we can't go further than steps
positions away from the starting point. This is because each step can move us at most 1 position, so after steps
steps, we can be at most steps
positions away from the starting point.
We need to fill in the DP table of size (steps + 1) × (min(arrLen, steps) + 1), and each cell takes constant time to compute.
We use a 2D DP array of size (steps + 1) × (min(arrLen, steps) + 1) to store the number of ways for each step and position.
We can optimize the space complexity of the dynamic programming approach by using a 1D array instead of a 2D array.
The key observation is that when we're calculating dp[i][j]
, we only need the values from the previous step dp[i-1][...]
. So, we can use two 1D arrays, curr
and prev
, to store the current and previous steps' values, respectively.
The recurrence relation remains the same:
curr[j] = prev[j] + prev[j-1] + prev[j+1]
After each step, we swap curr
and prev
to prepare for the next step.
This approach reduces the space complexity from O(steps * min(arrLen, steps))
to O(min(arrLen, steps))
, while maintaining the same time complexity.
We still need to process each step and position, which takes O(steps * min(arrLen, steps)) time.
We only use two 1D arrays of size min(arrLen, steps) + 1 to store the number of ways for the current and previous steps.
We can further optimize the solution by observing that we don't need to consider all positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps)
. In fact, we only need to consider positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps/2)
.
This is because to return to position 0 after steps
steps, we can go at most steps/2
positions away from the starting point. If we go further, we won't have enough steps to return to position 0.
For example, if steps = 10
, we can go at most 5 positions away from the starting point (position 0), because we need 5 steps to go there and 5 steps to return.
This optimization further reduces the time and space complexity from O(steps * min(arrLen, steps))
to O(steps * min(arrLen, steps/2))
.
We only need to process positions up to min(arrLen, steps/2), which reduces the time complexity.
We only use two 1D arrays of size min(arrLen, steps/2) + 1 to store the number of ways for the current and previous steps.
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425function numWays(steps, arrLen): // Define the maximum position we need to consider maxPosition = min(arrLen - 1, steps) // Initialize DP array dp = new 2D array of size (steps + 1) × (maxPosition + 1), initialized with 0 // Base case dp[0][0] = 1 // Fill DP array for i from 1 to steps: for j from 0 to maxPosition: // Stay at position j dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j] // Move right from position j-1 if j {'>'} 0: dp[i][j] = (dp[i][j] + dp[i-1][j-1]) % MOD // Move left from position j+1 if j {'<'} maxPosition: dp[i][j] = (dp[i][j] + dp[i-1][j+1]) % MOD return dp[steps][0]
Understand different approaches to solve the number of ways to stay in the same place after some steps problem and analyze their efficiency.
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to build up the solution from smaller subproblems.
Let's define dp[i][j]
as the number of ways to be at position j
after i
steps.
For each step i
and position j
, we can consider three possible moves:
j
: dp[i-1][j]
waysj+1
: dp[i-1][j+1]
waysj-1
: dp[i-1][j-1]
waysTherefore, the recurrence relation is:
dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j] + dp[i-1][j-1] + dp[i-1][j+1]
We need to be careful about the boundary conditions:
j-1 < 0
, then dp[i-1][j-1] = 0
(can't move right from a negative position)j+1 >= arrLen
, then dp[i-1][j+1] = 0
(can't move left from a position outside the array)The base case is dp[0][0] = 1
, as there is one way to be at position 0 after 0 steps.
The final answer is dp[steps][0]
, which represents the number of ways to be at position 0 after steps
steps.
An important optimization is to observe that we only need to consider positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps)
, as we can't go further than steps
positions away from the starting point. This is because each step can move us at most 1 position, so after steps
steps, we can be at most steps
positions away from the starting point.
We can optimize the space complexity of the dynamic programming approach by using a 1D array instead of a 2D array.
The key observation is that when we're calculating dp[i][j]
, we only need the values from the previous step dp[i-1][...]
. So, we can use two 1D arrays, curr
and prev
, to store the current and previous steps' values, respectively.
The recurrence relation remains the same:
curr[j] = prev[j] + prev[j-1] + prev[j+1]
After each step, we swap curr
and prev
to prepare for the next step.
This approach reduces the space complexity from O(steps * min(arrLen, steps))
to O(min(arrLen, steps))
, while maintaining the same time complexity.
We can further optimize the solution by observing that we don't need to consider all positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps)
. In fact, we only need to consider positions up to min(arrLen-1, steps/2)
.
This is because to return to position 0 after steps
steps, we can go at most steps/2
positions away from the starting point. If we go further, we won't have enough steps to return to position 0.
For example, if steps = 10
, we can go at most 5 positions away from the starting point (position 0), because we need 5 steps to go there and 5 steps to return.
This optimization further reduces the time and space complexity from O(steps * min(arrLen, steps))
to O(steps * min(arrLen, steps/2))
.
We need to fill in the DP table of size (steps + 1) × (min(arrLen, steps) + 1), and each cell takes constant time to compute.
We use a 2D DP array of size (steps + 1) × (min(arrLen, steps) + 1) to store the number of ways for each step and position.
We still need to process each step and position, which takes O(steps * min(arrLen, steps)) time.
We only use two 1D arrays of size min(arrLen, steps) + 1 to store the number of ways for the current and previous steps.
We only need to process positions up to min(arrLen, steps/2), which reduces the time complexity.
We only use two 1D arrays of size min(arrLen, steps/2) + 1 to store the number of ways for the current and previous steps.
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425function numWays(steps, arrLen): // Define the maximum position we need to consider maxPosition = min(arrLen - 1, steps) // Initialize DP array dp = new 2D array of size (steps + 1) × (maxPosition + 1), initialized with 0 // Base case dp[0][0] = 1 // Fill DP array for i from 1 to steps: for j from 0 to maxPosition: // Stay at position j dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j] // Move right from position j-1 if j {'>'} 0: dp[i][j] = (dp[i][j] + dp[i-1][j-1]) % MOD // Move left from position j+1 if j {'<'} maxPosition: dp[i][j] = (dp[i][j] + dp[i-1][j+1]) % MOD return dp[steps][0]
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132function numWays(steps, arrLen): // Define the maximum position we need to consider maxPosition = min(arrLen - 1, steps) // Initialize arrays for previous and current steps prev = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 // Base case prev[0] = 1 // Fill arrays for i from 1 to steps: // Reset current array curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 for j from 0 to maxPosition: // Stay at position j curr[j] = prev[j] // Move right from position j-1 if j {'>'} 0: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j-1]) % MOD // Move left from position j+1 if j {'<'} maxPosition: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j+1]) % MOD // Swap arrays for next step prev = curr return prev[0]
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132function numWays(steps, arrLen): // Define the maximum position we need to consider maxPosition = min(arrLen - 1, steps / 2) // Initialize arrays for previous and current steps prev = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 // Base case prev[0] = 1 // Fill arrays for i from 1 to steps: // Reset current array curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 for j from 0 to maxPosition: // Stay at position j curr[j] = prev[j] // Move right from position j-1 if j {'>'} 0: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j-1]) % MOD // Move left from position j+1 if j {'<'} maxPosition: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j+1]) % MOD // Swap arrays for next step prev = curr return prev[0]
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132function numWays(steps, arrLen): // Define the maximum position we need to consider maxPosition = min(arrLen - 1, steps / 2) // Initialize arrays for previous and current steps prev = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 // Base case prev[0] = 1 // Fill arrays for i from 1 to steps: // Reset current array curr = new array of size maxPosition + 1, initialized with 0 for j from 0 to maxPosition: // Stay at position j curr[j] = prev[j] // Move right from position j-1 if j {'>'} 0: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j-1]) % MOD // Move left from position j+1 if j {'<'} maxPosition: curr[j] = (curr[j] + prev[j+1]) % MOD // Swap arrays for next step prev = curr return prev[0]