There are 3 main approaches to solve this problem:
One straightforward approach is to generate the entire Pascal's Triangle up to the rowIndex-th row, and then return the last row.
Thinking Process: We can use the same approach as in the "Pascal's Triangle" problem to generate all rows up to the rowIndex-th row. Then, we simply return the last row.
Intuition: This approach is simple and directly follows the definition of Pascal's Triangle. However, it doesn't meet the follow-up requirement of using only O(rowIndex) extra space, as we're storing all rows of the triangle.
We need to calculate rowIndex rows, and each row i has i+1 elements, leading to a total of (rowIndex+1)(rowIndex+2)/2 elements, which is O(rowIndex²).
We only need to store the current row, which has rowIndex+1 elements, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
We can optimize the space complexity by calculating the row in-place, updating the array from right to left.
Thinking Process: If we update the array from left to right, we would overwrite values that we still need for subsequent calculations. However, if we update from right to left, we can ensure that we don't overwrite values before we use them.
Intuition: By updating the array from right to left, we can calculate the rowIndex-th row using only O(rowIndex) extra space, meeting the follow-up requirement.
We still need to perform calculations for each element in the triangle up to the rowIndex-th row, resulting in O(rowIndex²) time complexity.
We only use a single array of size rowIndex+1, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
We can directly calculate the rowIndex-th row using the mathematical formula for binomial coefficients.
Thinking Process: The element at position j in the rowIndex-th row is C(rowIndex, j) = rowIndex! / (j! * (rowIndex-j)!). However, computing factorials can lead to overflow for large numbers, so we need to use an optimized approach.
Intuition: We can use the property that C(n, k) = C(n, k-1) * (n-k+1) / k, which allows us to calculate each element based on the previous element in the same row, avoiding factorial calculations.
We calculate each element in the row once, resulting in O(rowIndex) time complexity.
We use a single array of size rowIndex+1, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
1234567891011121314151617181920function getRow(rowIndex): // Initialize result with the first row result = [1] // Generate each row based on the previous row for i from 1 to rowIndex: // Create a new row row = [1] // Calculate middle elements for j from 1 to i-1: row.append(result[j-1] + result[j]) // End with 1 row.append(1) // Replace result with the new row result = row return result
Understand different approaches to solve the row extractor problem and analyze their efficiency.
One straightforward approach is to generate the entire Pascal's Triangle up to the rowIndex-th row, and then return the last row.
Thinking Process: We can use the same approach as in the "Pascal's Triangle" problem to generate all rows up to the rowIndex-th row. Then, we simply return the last row.
Intuition: This approach is simple and directly follows the definition of Pascal's Triangle. However, it doesn't meet the follow-up requirement of using only O(rowIndex) extra space, as we're storing all rows of the triangle.
We can optimize the space complexity by calculating the row in-place, updating the array from right to left.
Thinking Process: If we update the array from left to right, we would overwrite values that we still need for subsequent calculations. However, if we update from right to left, we can ensure that we don't overwrite values before we use them.
Intuition: By updating the array from right to left, we can calculate the rowIndex-th row using only O(rowIndex) extra space, meeting the follow-up requirement.
We can directly calculate the rowIndex-th row using the mathematical formula for binomial coefficients.
Thinking Process: The element at position j in the rowIndex-th row is C(rowIndex, j) = rowIndex! / (j! * (rowIndex-j)!). However, computing factorials can lead to overflow for large numbers, so we need to use an optimized approach.
Intuition: We can use the property that C(n, k) = C(n, k-1) * (n-k+1) / k, which allows us to calculate each element based on the previous element in the same row, avoiding factorial calculations.
We need to calculate rowIndex rows, and each row i has i+1 elements, leading to a total of (rowIndex+1)(rowIndex+2)/2 elements, which is O(rowIndex²).
We only need to store the current row, which has rowIndex+1 elements, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
We still need to perform calculations for each element in the triangle up to the rowIndex-th row, resulting in O(rowIndex²) time complexity.
We only use a single array of size rowIndex+1, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
We calculate each element in the row once, resulting in O(rowIndex) time complexity.
We use a single array of size rowIndex+1, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
1234567891011121314151617181920function getRow(rowIndex): // Initialize result with the first row result = [1] // Generate each row based on the previous row for i from 1 to rowIndex: // Create a new row row = [1] // Calculate middle elements for j from 1 to i-1: row.append(result[j-1] + result[j]) // End with 1 row.append(1) // Replace result with the new row result = row return result
1234567891011function getRow(rowIndex): // Initialize array with all 1s row = array of size rowIndex+1 filled with 1s // Update the array in-place for i from 2 to rowIndex: // Update from right to left for j from i-1 down to 1: row[j] = row[j] + row[j-1] return row
123456789101112function getRow(rowIndex): // Initialize array row = array of size rowIndex+1 // First element is always 1 row[0] = 1 // Calculate remaining elements using the formula for j from 1 to rowIndex: row[j] = row[j-1] * (rowIndex - j + 1) / j return row
There are 3 main approaches to solve this problem:
One straightforward approach is to generate the entire Pascal's Triangle up to the rowIndex-th row, and then return the last row.
Thinking Process: We can use the same approach as in the "Pascal's Triangle" problem to generate all rows up to the rowIndex-th row. Then, we simply return the last row.
Intuition: This approach is simple and directly follows the definition of Pascal's Triangle. However, it doesn't meet the follow-up requirement of using only O(rowIndex) extra space, as we're storing all rows of the triangle.
We need to calculate rowIndex rows, and each row i has i+1 elements, leading to a total of (rowIndex+1)(rowIndex+2)/2 elements, which is O(rowIndex²).
We only need to store the current row, which has rowIndex+1 elements, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
We can optimize the space complexity by calculating the row in-place, updating the array from right to left.
Thinking Process: If we update the array from left to right, we would overwrite values that we still need for subsequent calculations. However, if we update from right to left, we can ensure that we don't overwrite values before we use them.
Intuition: By updating the array from right to left, we can calculate the rowIndex-th row using only O(rowIndex) extra space, meeting the follow-up requirement.
We still need to perform calculations for each element in the triangle up to the rowIndex-th row, resulting in O(rowIndex²) time complexity.
We only use a single array of size rowIndex+1, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
We can directly calculate the rowIndex-th row using the mathematical formula for binomial coefficients.
Thinking Process: The element at position j in the rowIndex-th row is C(rowIndex, j) = rowIndex! / (j! * (rowIndex-j)!). However, computing factorials can lead to overflow for large numbers, so we need to use an optimized approach.
Intuition: We can use the property that C(n, k) = C(n, k-1) * (n-k+1) / k, which allows us to calculate each element based on the previous element in the same row, avoiding factorial calculations.
We calculate each element in the row once, resulting in O(rowIndex) time complexity.
We use a single array of size rowIndex+1, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
1234567891011121314151617181920function getRow(rowIndex): // Initialize result with the first row result = [1] // Generate each row based on the previous row for i from 1 to rowIndex: // Create a new row row = [1] // Calculate middle elements for j from 1 to i-1: row.append(result[j-1] + result[j]) // End with 1 row.append(1) // Replace result with the new row result = row return result
Understand different approaches to solve the row extractor problem and analyze their efficiency.
One straightforward approach is to generate the entire Pascal's Triangle up to the rowIndex-th row, and then return the last row.
Thinking Process: We can use the same approach as in the "Pascal's Triangle" problem to generate all rows up to the rowIndex-th row. Then, we simply return the last row.
Intuition: This approach is simple and directly follows the definition of Pascal's Triangle. However, it doesn't meet the follow-up requirement of using only O(rowIndex) extra space, as we're storing all rows of the triangle.
We can optimize the space complexity by calculating the row in-place, updating the array from right to left.
Thinking Process: If we update the array from left to right, we would overwrite values that we still need for subsequent calculations. However, if we update from right to left, we can ensure that we don't overwrite values before we use them.
Intuition: By updating the array from right to left, we can calculate the rowIndex-th row using only O(rowIndex) extra space, meeting the follow-up requirement.
We can directly calculate the rowIndex-th row using the mathematical formula for binomial coefficients.
Thinking Process: The element at position j in the rowIndex-th row is C(rowIndex, j) = rowIndex! / (j! * (rowIndex-j)!). However, computing factorials can lead to overflow for large numbers, so we need to use an optimized approach.
Intuition: We can use the property that C(n, k) = C(n, k-1) * (n-k+1) / k, which allows us to calculate each element based on the previous element in the same row, avoiding factorial calculations.
We need to calculate rowIndex rows, and each row i has i+1 elements, leading to a total of (rowIndex+1)(rowIndex+2)/2 elements, which is O(rowIndex²).
We only need to store the current row, which has rowIndex+1 elements, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
We still need to perform calculations for each element in the triangle up to the rowIndex-th row, resulting in O(rowIndex²) time complexity.
We only use a single array of size rowIndex+1, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
We calculate each element in the row once, resulting in O(rowIndex) time complexity.
We use a single array of size rowIndex+1, resulting in O(rowIndex) space complexity.
1234567891011121314151617181920function getRow(rowIndex): // Initialize result with the first row result = [1] // Generate each row based on the previous row for i from 1 to rowIndex: // Create a new row row = [1] // Calculate middle elements for j from 1 to i-1: row.append(result[j-1] + result[j]) // End with 1 row.append(1) // Replace result with the new row result = row return result
1234567891011function getRow(rowIndex): // Initialize array with all 1s row = array of size rowIndex+1 filled with 1s // Update the array in-place for i from 2 to rowIndex: // Update from right to left for j from i-1 down to 1: row[j] = row[j] + row[j-1] return row
123456789101112function getRow(rowIndex): // Initialize array row = array of size rowIndex+1 // First element is always 1 row[0] = 1 // Calculate remaining elements using the formula for j from 1 to rowIndex: row[j] = row[j-1] * (rowIndex - j + 1) / j return row