There are 3 main approaches to solve this problem:
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to find the minimum number of operations needed for each number of 'A's from 1 to n.
Let's define dp[i]
as the minimum number of operations to get exactly i
'A's on the screen. We know that dp[1] = 0
since we start with one 'A'.
For each i
from 2 to n, we need to find the minimum number of operations. We can achieve this by considering all possible ways to reach i
'A's by copying and pasting from a smaller number of 'A's.
Specifically, for each j
that is a divisor of i
(where j < i
), we can copy all j
'A's and then paste (i/j) - 1
times. This would take a total of dp[j] + (i/j)
operations (dp[j] to get to j 'A's, 1 operation to copy all, and (i/j) - 1 operations to paste).
We choose the minimum of these values for dp[i]
.
We need to compute dp[i] for each i from 1 to n, and for each i, we consider all possible j from 1 to i-1.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the minimum number of operations for each number of 'A's.
An alternative approach is to use the observation that the minimum number of operations is the sum of the prime factors of n (counting duplicates).
This is because the most efficient way to get n 'A's is to build up the number by multiplying by its prime factors. For each prime factor p, we need p operations: 1 to copy and p-1 to paste.
For example, if n = 6 = 2 × 3, we need 2 + 3 = 5 operations:
Note that we only count the operations from step 2 onwards, so that's 5 operations.
We only need to check potential prime factors up to the square root of n.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
We can optimize the dynamic programming approach by only considering the divisors of i when calculating dp[i], rather than checking all j from 1 to i-1.
This is because if j is not a divisor of i, we cannot get exactly i 'A's by copying all j 'A's and then pasting.
This optimization reduces the time complexity from O(n²) to O(n * sqrt(n)), as the number of divisors of a number is approximately O(sqrt(n)).
We need to compute dp[i] for each i from 1 to n, and for each i, we consider all divisors of i, which is approximately O(sqrt(n)).
We use an array of size n+1 to store the minimum number of operations for each number of 'A's.
123456789101112function minSteps(n): // Initialize dp array dp = new array of size n+1 dp[1] = 0 // We start with one 'A' for i from 2 to n: dp[i] = infinity for j from 1 to i-1: if i is divisible by j: dp[i] = min(dp[i], dp[j] + (i/j)) return dp[n]
Understand different approaches to solve the 2 keys keyboard problem and analyze their efficiency.
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to find the minimum number of operations needed for each number of 'A's from 1 to n.
Let's define dp[i]
as the minimum number of operations to get exactly i
'A's on the screen. We know that dp[1] = 0
since we start with one 'A'.
For each i
from 2 to n, we need to find the minimum number of operations. We can achieve this by considering all possible ways to reach i
'A's by copying and pasting from a smaller number of 'A's.
Specifically, for each j
that is a divisor of i
(where j < i
), we can copy all j
'A's and then paste (i/j) - 1
times. This would take a total of dp[j] + (i/j)
operations (dp[j] to get to j 'A's, 1 operation to copy all, and (i/j) - 1 operations to paste).
We choose the minimum of these values for dp[i]
.
An alternative approach is to use the observation that the minimum number of operations is the sum of the prime factors of n (counting duplicates).
This is because the most efficient way to get n 'A's is to build up the number by multiplying by its prime factors. For each prime factor p, we need p operations: 1 to copy and p-1 to paste.
For example, if n = 6 = 2 × 3, we need 2 + 3 = 5 operations:
Note that we only count the operations from step 2 onwards, so that's 5 operations.
We can optimize the dynamic programming approach by only considering the divisors of i when calculating dp[i], rather than checking all j from 1 to i-1.
This is because if j is not a divisor of i, we cannot get exactly i 'A's by copying all j 'A's and then pasting.
This optimization reduces the time complexity from O(n²) to O(n * sqrt(n)), as the number of divisors of a number is approximately O(sqrt(n)).
We need to compute dp[i] for each i from 1 to n, and for each i, we consider all possible j from 1 to i-1.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the minimum number of operations for each number of 'A's.
We only need to check potential prime factors up to the square root of n.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
We need to compute dp[i] for each i from 1 to n, and for each i, we consider all divisors of i, which is approximately O(sqrt(n)).
We use an array of size n+1 to store the minimum number of operations for each number of 'A's.
123456789101112function minSteps(n): // Initialize dp array dp = new array of size n+1 dp[1] = 0 // We start with one 'A' for i from 2 to n: dp[i] = infinity for j from 1 to i-1: if i is divisible by j: dp[i] = min(dp[i], dp[j] + (i/j)) return dp[n]
123456789101112function minSteps(n): result = 0 for i from 2 to sqrt(n): while n is divisible by i: result += i n = n / i if n > 1: result += n return result
There are 3 main approaches to solve this problem:
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to find the minimum number of operations needed for each number of 'A's from 1 to n.
Let's define dp[i]
as the minimum number of operations to get exactly i
'A's on the screen. We know that dp[1] = 0
since we start with one 'A'.
For each i
from 2 to n, we need to find the minimum number of operations. We can achieve this by considering all possible ways to reach i
'A's by copying and pasting from a smaller number of 'A's.
Specifically, for each j
that is a divisor of i
(where j < i
), we can copy all j
'A's and then paste (i/j) - 1
times. This would take a total of dp[j] + (i/j)
operations (dp[j] to get to j 'A's, 1 operation to copy all, and (i/j) - 1 operations to paste).
We choose the minimum of these values for dp[i]
.
We need to compute dp[i] for each i from 1 to n, and for each i, we consider all possible j from 1 to i-1.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the minimum number of operations for each number of 'A's.
An alternative approach is to use the observation that the minimum number of operations is the sum of the prime factors of n (counting duplicates).
This is because the most efficient way to get n 'A's is to build up the number by multiplying by its prime factors. For each prime factor p, we need p operations: 1 to copy and p-1 to paste.
For example, if n = 6 = 2 × 3, we need 2 + 3 = 5 operations:
Note that we only count the operations from step 2 onwards, so that's 5 operations.
We only need to check potential prime factors up to the square root of n.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
We can optimize the dynamic programming approach by only considering the divisors of i when calculating dp[i], rather than checking all j from 1 to i-1.
This is because if j is not a divisor of i, we cannot get exactly i 'A's by copying all j 'A's and then pasting.
This optimization reduces the time complexity from O(n²) to O(n * sqrt(n)), as the number of divisors of a number is approximately O(sqrt(n)).
We need to compute dp[i] for each i from 1 to n, and for each i, we consider all divisors of i, which is approximately O(sqrt(n)).
We use an array of size n+1 to store the minimum number of operations for each number of 'A's.
123456789101112function minSteps(n): // Initialize dp array dp = new array of size n+1 dp[1] = 0 // We start with one 'A' for i from 2 to n: dp[i] = infinity for j from 1 to i-1: if i is divisible by j: dp[i] = min(dp[i], dp[j] + (i/j)) return dp[n]
Understand different approaches to solve the 2 keys keyboard problem and analyze their efficiency.
The key insight for solving this problem is to use dynamic programming to find the minimum number of operations needed for each number of 'A's from 1 to n.
Let's define dp[i]
as the minimum number of operations to get exactly i
'A's on the screen. We know that dp[1] = 0
since we start with one 'A'.
For each i
from 2 to n, we need to find the minimum number of operations. We can achieve this by considering all possible ways to reach i
'A's by copying and pasting from a smaller number of 'A's.
Specifically, for each j
that is a divisor of i
(where j < i
), we can copy all j
'A's and then paste (i/j) - 1
times. This would take a total of dp[j] + (i/j)
operations (dp[j] to get to j 'A's, 1 operation to copy all, and (i/j) - 1 operations to paste).
We choose the minimum of these values for dp[i]
.
An alternative approach is to use the observation that the minimum number of operations is the sum of the prime factors of n (counting duplicates).
This is because the most efficient way to get n 'A's is to build up the number by multiplying by its prime factors. For each prime factor p, we need p operations: 1 to copy and p-1 to paste.
For example, if n = 6 = 2 × 3, we need 2 + 3 = 5 operations:
Note that we only count the operations from step 2 onwards, so that's 5 operations.
We can optimize the dynamic programming approach by only considering the divisors of i when calculating dp[i], rather than checking all j from 1 to i-1.
This is because if j is not a divisor of i, we cannot get exactly i 'A's by copying all j 'A's and then pasting.
This optimization reduces the time complexity from O(n²) to O(n * sqrt(n)), as the number of divisors of a number is approximately O(sqrt(n)).
We need to compute dp[i] for each i from 1 to n, and for each i, we consider all possible j from 1 to i-1.
We use an array of size n+1 to store the minimum number of operations for each number of 'A's.
We only need to check potential prime factors up to the square root of n.
We only use a constant amount of extra space regardless of the input size.
We need to compute dp[i] for each i from 1 to n, and for each i, we consider all divisors of i, which is approximately O(sqrt(n)).
We use an array of size n+1 to store the minimum number of operations for each number of 'A's.
123456789101112function minSteps(n): // Initialize dp array dp = new array of size n+1 dp[1] = 0 // We start with one 'A' for i from 2 to n: dp[i] = infinity for j from 1 to i-1: if i is divisible by j: dp[i] = min(dp[i], dp[j] + (i/j)) return dp[n]
123456789101112function minSteps(n): result = 0 for i from 2 to sqrt(n): while n is divisible by i: result += i n = n / i if n > 1: result += n return result